Author
|
Topic: Texas lawmakers: Move Discovery to Houston
|
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 54840 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 04-10-2025 12:37 PM
collectSPACE Texas Senators: Move space shuttle Discovery from Smithsonian to HoustonNASA's retired space shuttle Discovery may be removed from the Smithsonian and put on display in Houston, if two lawmakers from Texas get their way. U.S. Senators John Cornyn (R-TX) and Ted Cruz (R-TX) on Thursday (April 10) introduced the "Bring the Space Shuttle Home Act," which directs NASA to take Discovery from the national collection and its Virginia home of the past 13 years and deliver it to official visitor center for NASA's Johnson Space Center.  |
dtemple Member Posts: 804 From: Longview, Texas, USA Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 04-11-2025 12:52 AM
This needed to be done back in 2011. Seems too late now. The move would cost millions of dollars, and seems totally impracticable at this point. Destroying the mate/demate device was not smart. Dismantling it and storing it (for a period of time as long as refurbishing an SCA was feasible), sure, but destroying it immediately, not smart. To eliminate a capability is not a good decision. There is some way to move an orbiter - enough money thrown at the problem is the only way. If a method is developed, it needs to be maintained so it can be done in the future. |
onesmallstep Member Posts: 1523 From: Staten Island, New York USA Registered: Nov 2007
|
posted 04-11-2025 08:22 AM
Let it be. What's next — moving the Liberty Bell from Philadelphia to the National Mall in DC? This is just posturing and PR; Space Center Houston already has a real 747 SCA with mockup Shuttle Independence mated on top (you can even walk through it). But if they really want to do it, why don't they ask all those nice space tech millionaires to foot the bill to pack up Discovery; ship it overland; construct a new enclosure/building in Houston etc. Oh, and give the Air and Space Museum's Udvar-Hazy Center in Virginia the 747/Independence; Houston can't have it both ways. I think us taxpayers should not have to foot the bill - a waste, per Musk's DOGE, no? |
Dave Ginsberg Member Posts: 219 From: Redmond, Washington, USA Registered: Dec 2007
|
posted 04-11-2025 02:48 PM
Since it seems (to me) that some of the historical facts may be distorted in the proposed bill, I went looking for the original selection criteria and decision process for choosing the museums to receive and display the three remaining space shuttle orbiters. I found this excellent compilation of articles and forum threads put together in real time as the shuttle orbiters were being prepared for display and delivered to museums. There may be some pertinent insights contained within. But, I am unable to find any articles or discussions specifically pertaining to the selection criteria and decision process. Could someone point me in that direction? |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 54840 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 04-11-2025 03:28 PM
The NASA Office of Inspector General reviewed NASA's selection of the space shuttle homes in August 2011. You can read that report here. |
CJ Member Posts: 103 From: Cherry Hill, NJ Registered: Nov 2003
|
posted 04-11-2025 07:06 PM
quote: Originally posted by dtemple: This needed to be done back in 2011. Seems too late now... Destroying the mate/demate device was not smart.
NASA has a habit of cutting things up or tearing them down. It's a budget thing.Give me a break. Sixty million people are within a three hour drive to Chantilly Virginia. |
mercsim Member Posts: 265 From: Phoenix, AZ Registered: Feb 2007
|
posted 04-11-2025 09:11 PM
"Bring the Space Shuttle Home..." It wasn't born there. It never landed there. It never took off from there. It seems like home would be Palmdale, Edwards, or Kennedy, but not Houston. |
OV-105 Member Posts: 929 From: Ridgecrest, CA Registered: Sep 2000
|
posted 04-12-2025 08:05 AM
quote: Originally posted by dtemple: Destroying the mate/demate device was not smart.
There were only two mate/demate devices, one at Edwards and one at KSC. There was also the orbiter lifting device that was moved from Vandenberg to Palmdale. The mobile one used during transition and retirement might still be around, but if not they do have the lifting sling at the California Science Center used to lift Endeavour. NASA 911 is in Palmdale and would need four engines and a full maintenance check but could still be used to move Discovery. The real question is, where would they put it in Houston? Is the Congress going to provide the funding for a building for it? |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 54840 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 04-12-2025 10:43 AM
The bill makes no mention of funding the exhibit.NASA 911 no longer has any of its orbiter attachment hardware. New hardware would have to be made. Likewise, the California Science Center scrapped (recycled) the sling and related orbiter attachment hardware after Endeavour's lift was completed. A new sling would need to be made. The SCA could land at Ellington, as it has in the past, but then it would be an even bigger challenge (and cost) to move Discovery from Ellington to Space Center Houston than it was to move NASA 905, as the latter was partially deconstructed before it was moved. On the Houston side, it would be better to barge Discovery to Clear Lake and then bring it on shore using the same loading dock that was used for the Saturn V stages. In Chantilly, however, Discovery would need to be transported 30 miles overland before it reached water, a distance more than double Endeavour traveled for three days (and nights) in Los Angeles. There is really no good way to move Discovery today and no good reason to do so. |
SpaceAngel Member Posts: 525 From: Maryland Registered: May 2010
|
posted 04-13-2025 02:38 PM
"Discovery" deserves to remain in its rightful retirement home at the National Air and Space Museum's Udvar Hazy; besides, the SCAs have already been retired and it would be impossible relocate the orbiter. |
denali414 Member Posts: 912 From: Raleigh, NC Registered: Aug 2017
|
posted 04-15-2025 08:14 AM
More political nonsense, without a purpose, just a vanity bill from Texas senators. As pointed out no historical reason to be in Houston, never landed there. The costs would be in millions and that is without the cost of building a housing for it. In my opinion, a complete waste, and ruins years of advertising for Smithsonian. |
GACspaceguy Member Posts: 3191 From: Guyton, GA Registered: Jan 2006
|
posted 04-15-2025 08:26 AM
Have them set up a virtual tour booth at JSC that allows a camera that does a walk around tour of the Shuttle that the viewer controls.Moving an artifact of that size is always possible given enough money but why do it. The Smithsonian is the right place for an orbiter. If you had to move one and could really justify it more, move Enterprise. NYC never felt right to me and you could barge it to Houston. But that is just my thoughts not recommendations. "Leave sleeping dogs alone" in my opinion. |
space1 Member Posts: 963 From: Danville, Ohio Registered: Dec 2002
|
posted 04-15-2025 09:28 AM
We have to keep in mind that the selection criteria considered more than just an association with the Orbiter. As I recall there was consideration for additional teaching resources and exhibit features, among other things. So winners were picked, and losers were disappointed. Houston has a Saturn V - that's plenty to be proud of.If any serious consideration would be given to such a move, it should only be done with private funding. That said, I would prefer things stay as they are. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 54840 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 04-15-2025 10:00 AM
quote: Originally posted by GACspaceguy: ...move Enterprise.
Enterprise is no longer federal property. As part of its move in 2011, its title was transferred to the Intrepid (just as Endeavour is now the property of the state of the California [the California Science Center is division of the state government]). The only orbiters Congress has remaining purview over are Atlantis and Discovery. One assumes that Cruz and Cornyn knew they could not make a strong enough argument to favor Houston over Kennedy Space Center, so they were only left with the Smithsonian. The problem, at least in the way I see it, is that Smithsonian has the strongest case for an orbiter over all other institutions. |
Jim Behling Member Posts: 2000 From: Cape Canaveral, FL Registered: Mar 2010
|
posted 04-15-2025 09:02 PM
quote: Originally posted by dtemple: Dismantling it and storing it (for a period of time as long as refurbishing an SCA was feasible), sure, but destroying it immediately, not smart.
They were not needed. Dismantling and storing a MDD would be a waste of money. Anyways, how do you think Discovery and Endeavour were removed from the SCA and Enterprise placed on one? |
pupnik Member Posts: 123 From: Maryland Registered: Jan 2014
|
posted 04-17-2025 05:35 PM
quote: Originally posted by space1: Houston has a Saturn V - that's plenty to be proud of.
And ironically, that Saturn V belongs to the Smithsonian. |
pokey Member Posts: 381 From: Houston, TX, USA Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 04-24-2025 09:34 AM
All retired shuttles are on the east or west coast. None are centrally located. FedEx is located in Memphis for a reason. The Kansas Cosmophere would have been a reasonable location for at least one. Houston is still on the perimeter of the U.S. Space Center Houston has the fiberglass orbiter on top of the 747. Yes, it's not a real one but it is viewable to more people. It is not hermetically sealed inside a building per the retired orbiter contracts. As someone who supported the shuttle program 1985 to 2011, driving by the 747 with the space shuttle while running errands is a beautiful sight. Never gets old. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 54840 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 04-28-2025 12:19 PM
Andrea Leinfelder with the Houston Chronicle, who originally broke this story, has followed up with an article delving more into the challenges involved with moving Discovery, with comments from Dennis Jenkins and myself. The article ends with my opinion: Still, Pearlman doesn't understand the sudden urge to move Discovery. Houstonians have moved past the snub, and Space Center Houston has a shuttle exhibit that's unlike any other as visitors can go inside. "Why even do this now?" Pearlman asked. "Any attempt to move Discovery will enter the risk of it being damaged or destroyed, leading to an unimaginable loss for space history." |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 54840 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 06-30-2025 12:44 PM
collectSPACE Relocation of space shuttle Discovery may hinge on 'Big Beautiful Bill'A political effort to relocate the space shuttle Discovery from the Smithsonian to Space Center Houston has been merged with the so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill," a major economic and policy package now nearing a vote in the U.S. Senate. The "Bring the Space Shuttle Home Act" first introduced by Texas Senators Ted Cruz and John Cornyn in April has now been added to the Senate's version of the bill championed by President Donald Trump. While the latter legislation primarily focuses on tax cuts and spending increases, the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation, chaired by Cruz, added the retired orbiter's relocation as part of an additional $9.995 billion in funding for NASA's programs, including the return of astronauts to the moon and sending humans to Mars.  |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 54840 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 07-01-2025 10:08 PM
The Senate passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act today (July 1) with the provision to relocate space shuttle Discovery included. The vote was 50 to 50; Vice President JD Vance broke the tie. The bill now heads back to the House of Representatives. As Marcia Smith of Space Policy Online explains: For the reconciliation bill to go next to the President's desk, it must pass the House with no amendments. If amended, it must go back to the Senate.Amendments are being proposed to the Rules Committee. Among those amendments are: - From Suhas Subramanyam (Democrat, VA-10):
Strikes a provision requiring the transfer of a space vehicle and funding provided for the purpose of the transfer. - From George Whitesides (Democrat, CA-27):
Prohibits the use of funds for the transfer of the Discovery space shuttle out of the Smithsonian's Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center. For those not familiar, Whitesides was previously the chief of staff at NASA and the CEO of Virgin Galactic.Per Smith, the Speaker of the House is determined to get the bill to the President by July 4. Although we always warn against trying to guess what Congress will do, it seems unlikely any amendments will make it to the floor for debate. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 54840 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 07-03-2025 01:24 PM
The bill has passed in the House by a vote of 218 to 214. It now heads to the President to be signed into law. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 54840 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 07-04-2025 05:20 PM
The President signed the bill into law during a ceremony on the White House South Lawn today (July 4). It is not clear what options still exist, but the Smithsonian is committed to keeping Discovery at the Udvar-Hazy Center. |
ejectr Member Posts: 2047 From: Killingly, CT Registered: Mar 2002
|
posted 07-05-2025 10:15 AM
It should stay where it is. It belongs to the U.S. taxpayer... not Texas. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 54840 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 07-05-2025 10:36 AM
It is the Smithsonian's position that Discovery is not federal property (and as such does not belong to the U.S. taxpayer, so Congress cannot relocate it). It belongs to the Smithsonian, along with all of the other artifacts in its collection: The Smithsonian Institution owns the Discovery and holds it in trust for the American public. In 2012, NASA transferred “all rights, title, interest and ownership” of the shuttle to the Smithsonian. |
mode1charlie Member Posts: 1502 From: Honolulu, HI Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted 07-05-2025 06:13 PM
This whole thing is a total fiasco. It's a bad idea to start with, there isn't enough money allocated to do it, nor is there hardware in place to do it even if there was.It should be ignored before it's repealed. This is pork barrel politics at its worst and most absurd. |
p51 Member Posts: 1792 From: Olympia, WA Registered: Sep 2011
|
posted 07-05-2025 09:53 PM
quote: Originally posted by dtemple: Destroying the mate/demate device was not smart.
It was VERY smart. I think it was intentional to prevent this very brand of buffoonery after the orbiters got to where they were supposed to STAY.Quibbling over where they were supposed to go should have ended for all time over a decade ago. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 54840 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 07-05-2025 11:01 PM
The demolition and disposal of the mate/demate devices was because they were no longer needed, no longer being maintained and the government land on which they were sitting could be used for other purposes.The only reason the MDD at Kennedy played a role in the museum deliveries was because the orbiters departed from Florida. Were the vehicles elsewhere, like Enterprise, then the MDDs served no purpose. NASA used the sling from the mobile lift setup to hoist the orbiters at Dulles Airport, Kennedy International Airport and Los Angeles International Airport. The sling was last used to take Endeavour vertical at the California Science Center, by which time the apparatus belonged to the museum (left over from the LAX delivery) and was discarded. If Discovery's move proceeds and if it is by barge, then a new sling may need to be fabricated to bring the orbiter onto and off the barge(s). Since none of the logistics have been worked out as of yet, nothing of the plan is known. |
denali414 Member Posts: 912 From: Raleigh, NC Registered: Aug 2017
|
posted 07-07-2025 11:50 AM
$85 million to the shuttle. what an incredible waste of money! For no real purpose, in my opinion.Love to know the connections on where this $85 million goes. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 54840 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 07-07-2025 11:55 AM
To be clear, the $85 million is the total provided by Congress to move and build a new home for Discovery in Houston. Whatever is left over from the move is what goes to the new facility. Texas has a state fund ready to also contribute to the new building, according to a source. That said, the concern is that $85 million will not be enough. In 2012, it cost each of the museums $28.8 million to bring the orbiter to their state, and that was using the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft. Discovery's path to Houston is less direct involving (presumably) land and sea portions of the journey. |