Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Hardware & Flown Items
  Skylab/ASTP MDA/CSM verification unit

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Skylab/ASTP MDA/CSM verification unit
stsmithva
Member

Posts: 2035
From: Fairfax, VA
Registered: Feb 2007

posted 06-19-2021 09:49 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for stsmithva   Click Here to Email stsmithva     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I am hoping to find a photo of a unique piece of hardware being used during testing before Skylab or the Apollo Soyuz Test Project.

The Multiple Docking Adapter/Command Service Module Interface Verification Unit, a multi-function control panel and testing device, was physically attached to the CSM spacecraft before Skylab and ASTP. The Skylab MDA was brought from Marshall Space Flight Center to the Operations & Checkout Building (Manned Spacecraft Operations Building during the Apollo era) at Kennedy Space Center. There the CSM and and MDA were attached for testing before the MDA was taken to the VAB to be stacked with the rest of Skylab.

View of the front, with a yardstick for scale.

The top third of the control panel (communications, caution and warning, power).

A side view, again with a yardstick for scale. (It has the volume of a medium-sized refrigerator!)

The North American Aviation metal identification plate. (Always cool to see serial number "001".) Note that this was Model C54-035 — that gets mentioned later.

You can see many fascinating specifics about power, communication, and even air pressure in the controls. ("LMP" was used along with CDR because they were accustomed to that name for the astronaut in that seat.)

There are so many ports and cables, and a pressure relief valve (below), because this hardware wasn't just monitoring what was happening up in space. All of those electrical connections, and even actual air pressure, were run through this hardware to confirm during testing that the connections had occurred between the CSM and the MDA, and the astronauts would be able to work in Skylab or over in the Soyuz capsule. (This also explains why it is on wheels: with all of those cables and hoses snaking in and out of the CSM and MDA, it needed to be rolled into just the right position close to the spacecraft, then rolled back away.)

Here is from a 1971 NASA Skylab plan:

A docking test between the CSM and AM [Airlock Module]/MDA will be performed to verify the docking interfaces.

The CSM is placed in the West Integrated Test Stand. The AM/MDA is removed from its mobile transporter and lowered, MDA down, to mate with the CSM. The CSM has a probe identical to that used in Apollo and the MDA docking port has a drogue similar to that used in the Apollo LM for docking. A leak check is performed to verify the mechanical docking interface. Electrical/communications tests are accomplished to validate all electrical connections.

These tests are the only interface tests involving the flight CSM and the AM/MDA prior to launch. The next time these modules interface is following rendezvous maneuvers in earth orbit as earlier described.

This piece of equipment is also mentioned in the earliest planning for the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project. NASA publication SD 71-700, International Rendezvous and Docking Mission, was printed in December 1971 (the month I was born!) It is a proposal for a joint US-Soviet - Apollo-Salyut Space Station-Soyuz docking mission. It reads in part:
A requirement exists to electrically check out the DM [docking module] at the Salyut interface and the CSM at the CSM/DM interface. The checkouts will be accomplished ... utilizing ... the C54-035 at LC-39.
(LC-39 refers to Launch Complex 39 at Kennedy Space Center, used for Apollo, Skylab, and ASTP launches.)

So many NASA images are online nowadays that I have been surprised to not find a single image of the Skylab or ASTP testing that might include the verification unit. (Maybe I've gotten spoiled!) If anyone can find one in a book, or a report, or just a stack of photos, I would be tremendously grateful. Please point out this post to anyone you know who might have such a photo.

Also, if anyone can provide any additional information, or corrections, I would appreciate it. (I should mention that I've decided to consign it, as fun as it's been to have it in my house.) Thank you very much for any time and effort you can provide!

Jim Behling
Member

Posts: 1714
From: Cape Canaveral, FL
Registered: Mar 2010

posted 06-19-2021 01:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jim Behling   Click Here to Email Jim Behling     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I believe this unit was used to test the CSM to MDA interfaces (without the MDA) before the actual CSM to MDA docking interface test. There wouldn't be any reason to insert this in the actual docking test. The testing personnel would looking at CSM and MDA displays. The test plan description is of the actual docking test and not the test with this unit.

This rack would mimic the MDA for CSM testing. This would be especially important for SL-3 and SL-4 CSMs since there was no MDA available to do a docking/interface test. Skylab used the CSM S-band comm system for voice uplink and downlink. You can see that the unit was setup for testing that. Additionally, the CSM C&W system would send signals MDA to be integrated in to the cluster C&W system. Finally, the MDA would have a power umbilical to provide electricity to the CSM after the fuel cells were shut down.

The rack performs the same role for ATSP. Testing the CSM interfaces before the actual docking test.

The comment about LC-39 is likely in error. This type of testing would not be feasible at the VAB or pad. It would have been done in the MSOB.

There is likely no photos because the test is not interesting enough. Just a rack placed by the CSM with some cables flowing electrons, not any different than other electrical tests.

stsmithva
Member

Posts: 2035
From: Fairfax, VA
Registered: Feb 2007

posted 06-19-2021 04:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for stsmithva   Click Here to Email stsmithva     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thank you for that great, detailed reply! That's an important clarification. If anyone else has anything to add, please do so!

Jurvetson
Member

Posts: 139
From: Los Altos an SF, CA, United States
Registered: Sep 2011

posted 04-10-2022 01:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jurvetson   Click Here to Email Jurvetson     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks for this post. I have a couple of MDA test panels, and I am trying to figure out what they were used for, and if they relate to the use case described on this thread.

Apollo MDA Control Panel No. 1

Apollo MDA Control Panel No. 2

Jim Behling
Member

Posts: 1714
From: Cape Canaveral, FL
Registered: Mar 2010

posted 04-11-2022 07:06 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jim Behling   Click Here to Email Jim Behling     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The second panel looks like a comm checkout panel. The red capped connectors on the lower right look like they are for CDR and LMP headsets. The use of modified CSMs for Skylab would mean hardline comm between the CM and MDA would have been through the channels that on previous Apollo missions were designated as CDR and LMP. The OP's panel was to checkout the CSM interfaces and it looks like this panel checks out the MDA comm interface to the CSM.

The first panel looks a power supply for the MDA ground testing.

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 5054
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-11-2022 07:55 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
LMP was replaced by the Science Pilot on Skylab. Possible the test panel was for AAP (which ultimately evolved to Skylab and initially intended to use a LM).

Jim Behling
Member

Posts: 1714
From: Cape Canaveral, FL
Registered: Mar 2010

posted 04-11-2022 03:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jim Behling   Click Here to Email Jim Behling     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Nah, the OP's panel has the same designation. This are for MDA to CM interfaces and not other vehicles. Was just easier to keep the CM wiring the same and use the same designation.

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 5054
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-11-2022 05:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
AAP kicked off circa 1966.

OP assemblage was fabricated by NAA. NAA became NAR in 1967.

AAP didnt transition to Skylab until 1969.

Jim Behling
Member

Posts: 1714
From: Cape Canaveral, FL
Registered: Mar 2010

posted 04-16-2022 11:50 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jim Behling   Click Here to Email Jim Behling     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Parts tags and name plates seldom kept up with name changes and mergers.

GSE is designed and built later in the development cycle. MDA CDR wasn't until August 1970. It wouldn't known until that timeframe what exactly the MDA was to check CSM interfaces.

quote:
Originally posted by stsmithva:
The Multiple Docking Adapter/Command Service Module Interface Verification Unit
What are the dates on the name plates?

Jurvetson
Member

Posts: 139
From: Los Altos an SF, CA, United States
Registered: Sep 2011

posted 04-16-2022 05:18 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jurvetson   Click Here to Email Jurvetson     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Stickers inside Control Panel No. 1 are dated January 1974.

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 5054
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-16-2022 05:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
To be clear not discounting that the assemblages may have also been used subsequently for Skylab, just pointing out they were apparently developed for AAP initially.

I have a number of artifacts produced pre and post Rockwell merger. They all bear the correct labeling associated with respective production timeframes.

Jim Behling
Member

Posts: 1714
From: Cape Canaveral, FL
Registered: Mar 2010

posted 04-19-2022 11:26 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jim Behling   Click Here to Email Jim Behling     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
There wasn't any other hardware built for AAP other than what be came Skylab to be tested. Martin didn't take over MDA integration until August 1969. There wouldn't have been AAP MDA contractor to support GSE design until then.

LM, MDA and DM were the only items to interface with CSM. The LM always did a docking test on the ground with the CSM which would eliminate the need for this GSE.

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 5054
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-19-2022 12:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Martin was on task as the AAP Payload integrator by 1967 under contact NAS8-21004; MAC was also already under contract at that time to produce the MDA in accordance with AAP specifications.

Jim Behling
Member

Posts: 1714
From: Cape Canaveral, FL
Registered: Mar 2010

posted 04-20-2022 09:12 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jim Behling   Click Here to Email Jim Behling     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by SpaceAholic:
Martin was on task as the AAP Payload integrator by 1967 under contact NAS8-21004; MAC was also already under contract at that time to produce the MDA in accordance with AAP specifications.


Payload integration would not have had anything to do with this. Payload integration was for experiments in the MDA and workshop and not the other systems within the MDA. Martin would not have dealt with CSM interfaces until it was on contract for MDA integration. MAC produced the Airlock and not the MDA. MSFC built the MDA shell and Martin outfitted it.

From NASA TMX 64812

Year 1969 -
• Dry Workshop concept adds ATM Control & Display (C&D)
Console, deletes OWS experiment st'orage.
• MDA design, development, integration, fabrication,
test, delivery contract to Martin Marietta Corporation (MMC).
• MDA shell provided by Marshall Space Flight Center
(MSFC)

Shell construction was from May to Sep 1970 and delivered to Denver in Nov 1970. It was shipped to St Louis in 1971, and to KSC in Oct 1972.

There was no "earlier" MDA AAP hardware. It was all studies.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2022 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement