Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Commercial Space - Military Space
  [Discuss] SpaceX Starship and Super Heavy (Page 13)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search


This topic is 13 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   [Discuss] SpaceX Starship and Super Heavy
Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 52203
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 03-19-2024 11:18 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
From Reuters' space reporter Joey Roulette (via X):
SpaceX's Gwynne Shotwell at the Satellite 2024 convetion says next Starship test flight coming "hopefully in about six weeks," and she doesn't think they're going to deploy Starlinks on that test — wants to "focus on getting reentry right."

NukeGuy
Member

Posts: 118
From: Irvine, CA USA
Registered: May 2014

posted 03-25-2024 11:59 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for NukeGuy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Was Starship deliberately under-fueled for this test or did it carry a mass simulator in the payload bay?

The reason I ask is that the propellant quantities on the graphic displayed by SpaceX showed very low levels at shutdown. One would expect this if it was carrying its designed payload mass. But I don’t recall hearing of the test containing a mass simulator and one was not obvious from the camera in the payload bay.

Admittedly, the graphics are misleading as the LOX and methane tanks are different sizes but presented on the same scale.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 52203
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-04-2024 01:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
SpaceX update (via X):
Super Heavy booster for Flight 4 moved to the pad at Starbase.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 52203
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-05-2024 04:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
SpaceX Flight 3 highlights video

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 52203
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-06-2024 08:40 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
April 5 static fire of the Flight 4 Super Heavy booster:

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 52203
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-06-2024 08:46 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
SpaceX video
The goal of SpaceX is to build the technologies necessary to make life multiplanetary. This is the first time in the 4-billion-year history of Earth that it's possible to realize that goal and protect the light of consciousness.

At Starbase on Thursday, April 4, SpaceX Chief Engineer Elon Musk provided an update on the company's plans to send humanity to Mars, the best destination to begin making life multiplanetary.

Go to X for the full talk, which also includes the mechanics and challenges of traveling to Mars, along with what we're building today to enable sending around a million people and several million tonnes to the Martian surface in the years to come.

denali414
Member

Posts: 859
From: Raleigh, NC
Registered: Aug 2017

posted 04-08-2024 07:27 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for denali414   Click Here to Email denali414     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I find Musk more confusing by the year. The threat of nuking moon/Mars was bizarre.

Not once addresses the main problem of space radiation and solar flares that would impact any long flight to Mars or the impact on Mars to insulate the one million person "city" long term without an atmosphere to protect humans. Not even going into how you feed the large population. Sounds nice but still not viable.

Also the cost of shooting hundreds of rockets to Mars yearly to build this city, is beyond even Musk or any nations' wealth.

capoetc
Member

Posts: 2365
From: McKinney TX (USA)
Registered: Aug 2005

posted 04-08-2024 06:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for capoetc   Click Here to Email capoetc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by denali414:
Also the cost of shooting hundreds of rockets to Mars yearly to build this city, is beyond even Musk or any nations' wealth.
It is perhaps a bit premature to dismiss the notion out of hand.

There are many things to learn before colonizing the moon or Mars, and one of them will be, "What raw materials are already there that we won't have to bring along?" There will certainly be some materials that will be usable once some smart engineering minds are applied to the problem and a proper assessment of what is actually there is completed. We have hardly scratched the surface of knowledge, particularly about the red planet.

denali414
Member

Posts: 859
From: Raleigh, NC
Registered: Aug 2017

posted 04-09-2024 07:20 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for denali414   Click Here to Email denali414     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Agree, we have barely scratched the surface of knowledge of Mars. Musk was talking within the next few years, not decades from now. Maybe I took it wrong,but he was saying this is possible now and in my opinion, not close to possible.

It is great to think big and have a vision, but constraints and reality are many times much different. That talk seemed much more science fiction than current reality.

issman1
Member

Posts: 1121
From: UK
Registered: Apr 2005

posted 04-09-2024 01:05 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for issman1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Musk is now over 50, therefore must feel his mortality.

He said many times that he wants to die on Mars. But for that to happen every upcoming Starship test flight needs to be 100% successful.


This topic is 13 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13 

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 1999-2024 collectSPACE. All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement