Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Opinions & Advice
  Current value of Apollo 17 'insurance cover'?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Current value of Apollo 17 'insurance cover'?
Axman
Member

Posts: 393
From: Derbyshire UK
Registered: Mar 2023

posted 02-23-2024 02:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Axman   Click Here to Email Axman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Although not part of the original discussion group (I was still twelve years away from making my very first astrophilately purchase), I have two questions for you.
  1. Has anyone changed their minds in the meantime?

  2. What do you think a reasonable value is for a numbered Apollo 17 crew signed "insurance cover"?

MartinAir
Member

Posts: 352
From:
Registered: Oct 2020

posted 02-23-2024 03:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for MartinAir   Click Here to Email MartinAir     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Believe the consensus is the same. It's an anniversary cover and also different from the insurance TYPE cover. The market either disagrees or is not aware of this this assessment.

Axman
Member

Posts: 393
From: Derbyshire UK
Registered: Mar 2023

posted 03-01-2024 11:25 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Axman   Click Here to Email Axman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The market currently stands at $858 which is slightly lower than I expected, but considerably higher than I had hoped for. It dropped through my letterbox today.

By the way, it carries an explanation regarding why it is both an insurance cover and an anniversary cover which I find quite convincing...

MartinAir
Member

Posts: 352
From:
Registered: Oct 2020

posted 03-01-2024 11:45 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for MartinAir   Click Here to Email MartinAir     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If you are a completist, then it makes sense to obtain this cover as well. However, the way these covers were re-"discovered" and marketed by Peachstate is controversial.

capoetc
Member

Posts: 2359
From: McKinney TX (USA)
Registered: Aug 2005

posted 03-01-2024 11:51 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for capoetc   Click Here to Email capoetc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Axman:
By the way, it carries an explanation regarding why it is both an insurance cover and an anniversary cover which I find quite convincing...
I am happy that you are pleased with your purchase.

I am the one who originated the thread referred to in the first post of this thread. My concern then, as it is now, is that the nature of those anniversary covers [which languished for sale for many years at a much lower price until two guys came along and "added perceived value" to them] will be lost to current and future buyers. These two guys (primarily the owner of Peachstate) convinced Gene Cernan (who is completely blameless in the episode and who even sent a message to Robert for him to post on his behalf declaring that he did not consider the covers to meet the standard of "insurance covers") to sign COAs with wording that they fully understood, but they did NOT fully explain what the terms meant in the collecting community to Captin Cernan.

So, at this point, the only way those Apollo 17 covers can be considered "insurance covers" is to fundamentally alter the definition of what an insurance cover is. The market will continue to determine what they are worth, but I fear that people will not fully understand the TRUE story behind them as we get farther away from the attempt to "add value" to covers that everyone (including the market) agreed were nice anniversary covers.

It is also worth going back to fully understand the background of "Peachstate Historical Consulting," whose owner was the one who "discovered" the covers that were already publicly in plain sight and altered them many years after the fact to "create value." There are lots of threads on cS referring to Peachstate and its past practices as well as threads about the owner of Peachstate.

EDIT: The COA posted above was just now posted, so I can now comment on it. The text in the first paragraph is not true according to Gene Cernan's letter referenced in my post herein. According to Cernan, there was no intent to have them postmarked for the launch, and they were not postmarked for the launch. I stopped reading after that -- unfortunately, more attempts to add value to these covers in direct opposition of Gene Cernan's wishes. A real shame, because they were actually nice covers before they were tainted by opportunists who took advantage of Captain Cernan.

capoetc
Member

Posts: 2359
From: McKinney TX (USA)
Registered: Aug 2005

posted 03-01-2024 01:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for capoetc   Click Here to Email capoetc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by NAAmodel#240:
After reviewing the latest statement from Captain Cernan in which he contradicts the CoA he signed in January of this year my website will stop selling the Apollo 17 cover immediately. It is an unfortunate embarrassment to all concerned but without his signed attestation the crew envelopes can only be seen as anniversary covers.

Peachstate has also halted sales in light of the reversal. David Frohman, at a collectSPACE member’s suggestion, plans to forward Captain Cernan’s recent letter to customers and offer a full refund.


For the sake of this thread, I have copied the above post (verbatim) from David Ball (NAA model#240) from the aforementioned thread at the top of this thread, posted after Gene Cernan's letter was posted in that thread.

Mr. Ball was one of the two individuals involved in the marketing of these covers (I am unsure if he was involved in the creation or only in the marketing, but I became aware of the covers and originally posted the older thread after receiving an e-mail from Mr. Ball's company), and after seeing the Gene Cernan letter Mr. Ball stated that the covers "can only be seen as anniversary covers".

Sales were halted at the time by both companies that were selling them, so I do not know if the covers were then transferred to another dealer, sold in a more quiet manner, or if they are still in the possession of Mr. Ball and Mr. Frohman (meaning that the covers on the market would be the ones that were sold before the publication of Cernan's letter if the sales were indeed permanently halted).

Axman
Member

Posts: 393
From: Derbyshire UK
Registered: Mar 2023

posted 03-01-2024 02:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Axman   Click Here to Email Axman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The previous thread on collectSPACE was a great help insofar as it gave me a historical background, and I am grateful that there is information out there regarding these covers.

I am a collector, not an investor, I have no intention of putting this up for re-sale. I would, naturally, have been delighted to have bought it for closer to $10 rather than near $1,000.

I have it filed in my collection as a crew signed anniversary cover, it lives with my Apollo 17 collection at the end chronologically, not at the beginning. But I have to state that I find it logical that this started out life as an 'intended' Insurance cover. If the Apollo 15 moon landing cover scandal hadn't hit at the time it did I think it quite likely this would have been fully crew signed and postmarked on launch day as an insurance cover. As such, and with hindsight, it still makes a fascinating historic philatelic document, even though it is not an insurance cover.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 1999-2024 collectSPACE. All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement