|
|
Author
|
Topic: Space Cover 773: Halted launches
|
Antoni RIGO Member Posts: 332 From: Palma de Mallorca, Is. Baleares - SPAIN Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted 09-29-2024 12:00 PM
Space Cover of the Week, Week 773 (September 29, 2024) Space Cover 773: Halted launchesMaybe all collectors are obsessives in some way. I am not an exception. Please, click SCOTW 451 and SCOTW 668 to read and see some scrubbed launches and postponed launches respectively. And now, another term: halted launches. Above shown a cover postmarked twice at KSC with dates Jul 24 and Aug 12, 1993 with same result: launch halted. Both dates belong to STS-51 mission which was finally launched from KSC on Sep 12, 1993. However, it was not the first time that STS-51 mission was halted because on Jul 17, 1993 a first attempt to launch was not successfully. Anyone has a cover with this date? Thanks in advance to shown here. Again, a terminology question: If before countdown begins, a launch is delayed or postponed, and after countdown begins, a launch is scrubbed, where would you place a launch halted? Please, if you know other terms used in launch phase with reference to stop a launch, be so kind to post here and preferably if these terms appear in space covers. Thanks. |
Axman Member Posts: 597 From: Derbyshire UK Registered: Mar 2023
|
posted 09-29-2024 01:03 PM
A delay is when a countdown is held for whatever reason, and the countdown later continues from that point. Delays are common, and quite often intentionally incorporated into a launch schedule.A postponement is when a delay extends to the point whereby the countdown has to be rolled backwards such that when the countdown resumes it is at an earlier time than when the delay occurred. The majority of postponements are weather orientated, although a significant minority are resolved technical issues. A scrub is when the countdown is abandoned entirely and a new launch needs to be scheduled from scratch. Cancelled, aborted and halted are terms entirely synonymous with scrubbed. Some scubbed/halted launches become scrubbed missions, but most are just rescheduled as the same mission. (Failed, abandoned and destroyed launches are launches that have reached the end of countdown and have taken place but the mission is not accomplished for whatever reason. These are legion and there are many covers that celebrate them, but they lie outside of your definition as they are not "launches that have been stopped"). I have a few covers from scrubbed (i.e. halted) launches, most notoriously the Gemini GT-6 mission. I do not have, nor seen any delayed or postponed launch covers, although I have a couple of Apollo 17 launch covers that hint of the delay. |
Ken Havekotte Member Posts: 3871 From: Merritt Island, Florida, Brevard Registered: Mar 2001
|
posted 09-30-2024 05:03 AM
Covers were done for a few other missions, such as Glenn's MA-6, Apollo 9, Dec. 6/7 for Apollo 17, a postponement for STS-1 from April 10 to 12, shuttle Discovery's first launch abort, along with a few other shuttle flights mostly early on. I'll see what I can dig up. |
Axman Member Posts: 597 From: Derbyshire UK Registered: Mar 2023
|
posted 09-30-2024 06:24 AM
In a similar vein, the Apollo 16 launch was delayed.The Saturn-Apollo stack was initially rolled out on 13th December 1971 for a scheduled launch on 17th March 1972. A few problems arose and the mission was rescheduled for the next launch window after the original planned window, and so the stack was rolled back to the VAB on 27th January 1972. Apollo 16 was rolled out for a second time on 9th February for the successful launch on 16th April 1972. The roll-out and roll-back wasn't considered a launch scrub or halt, nor even a postponement, as the official mission countdown hadn't commenced. It was just a delay. The mission countdown finally commenced on Monday 10th April 1972 at 8:30am EST.  NB. The top cover correctly shows a Saturn V, the middle cover has an anachronistic Saturn 1B, and the bottom cover has an ancient Jupiter rocket! |
Ken Havekotte Member Posts: 3871 From: Merritt Island, Florida, Brevard Registered: Mar 2001
|
posted 09-30-2024 12:24 PM
Actually Alan, the last cachet cover depicts one of the early south-side launch pad structures that resemble Pads 5/6 and 26 A/B where the Jupiter, Juno, and later Redstone vehicles flew from. If you want to get more factual, the phrase "Kennedy Space Center" wasn't even around at the time those rockets were launched from the Cape-side. The rocket itself, as you pointed out, does resemble in some ways a Jupiter version (but not the top payload portion). It's more like a very thin elongated Jupiter-C rocket that put our first satellite into space. |
Axman Member Posts: 597 From: Derbyshire UK Registered: Mar 2023
|
posted 09-30-2024 12:55 PM
Thanks Ken. Any idea who might have originally made that particular rubber stamp? It has a certain DuBeau feel about it to me, but I'm not overly sure about that. |
Ken Havekotte Member Posts: 3871 From: Merritt Island, Florida, Brevard Registered: Mar 2001
|
posted 09-30-2024 04:30 PM
More likely the rubber stamp cachets were used by the Florida Space Coast cover servicing team of Dave Finney and M.L. Nickel. Both men were USPS postal workers mainly stationed at Cocoa, Rockledge, and would sometimes assist at the old Patrick AFB P.O. during those early space cover decades of the late 1950's until the early 1980's. Both Carl Swanson, Ray DuBeau, and another cachet designer did supply Finney and Nickel with generic rubber stamps as quick cachet applications.
| |
Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts
Copyright 1999-2024 collectSPACE. All rights reserved.

Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a
|
|
|
advertisement
|