Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Stamps & Covers
  Space Cover 375: First space shuttle crews named

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Space Cover 375: First space shuttle crews named
Antoni RIGO
Member

Posts: 176
From: Palma de Mallorca, Is. Baleares - SPAIN
Registered: Aug 2013

posted 07-03-2016 02:34 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Antoni RIGO   Click Here to Email Antoni RIGO     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Space Cover of the Week, Week 375 (July 3, 2016)

Space Cover 375: First space shuttle crews named

It is not yet in the Astrophilately rules but in the space history those space crews are named with enough time in advance to allow them to prepare for the space missions through training, tests, simulations and any other useful procedures for the space flights.

I am quite curious to know if anyone has lists with dates in which astronauts/cosmonauts were named and dates in which they really flown to space. I suspect that these lists are only a huge compilation of data and data but maybe, in summary, can give us an accurate idea of how long is the pre-launch time for candidates to astronauts.

The cover shown above presents the astronauts John Young and Robert Crippen when they were named prime crew for the first space shuttle mission. The cover was cancelled in Houston on March 16, 1978 and the space flights were scheduled to begin in early 1979. However, the first launch occurred on April 12, 1981 (three years and 27 days after your nomination), when the STS-1 was launched.

But on March 16, 1978 not only the first prime crew for space shuttle mission was announced, also its back-up crew and another complete space crew, i.e. prime and back-up.

In the top cover the astronauts Young and Crippen are pictured as prime crew for shuttle mission (STS-1 April 12, 1981) as well as Engle and Truly as back-up crew (STS-2 Nov 12, 1981).

In the second cover the astronauts Brand and Fullerton is prime crew and Lousma and Haise is back-up crew. However, were Lousma and Fullerton who flew first (STS-3 March 22, 1982) and Mattingly and Hartsfield (both not pictured) who flew in last of four space shuttle orbital mission (STS-4 Jun 27, 1982).

Veteran astronaut Vance Brand was moved to become the commander of first operational shuttle mission (STS-5 Nov. 11, 1982) with Overmeyer, Allen and Lenoir as rest of crew.

Finally Fred Haise (Lunar Module pilot for Apollo 13 mission) never flew onboard the space shuttle as he left NASA in June 1979 to become an executive in Grumman Aerospace Corp. until his retirement.

micropooz
Member

Posts: 1512
From: Washington, DC, USA
Registered: Apr 2003

posted 07-03-2016 12:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for micropooz   Click Here to Email micropooz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
There are covers in existence for the crew selections for:
  • Gemini 3, postmarked Houston, 4/13/64 and,
  • ASTP, postmarked Houston, 1/30/73.

Antoni RIGO
Member

Posts: 176
From: Palma de Mallorca, Is. Baleares - SPAIN
Registered: Aug 2013

posted 07-03-2016 01:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Antoni RIGO   Click Here to Email Antoni RIGO     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks Dennis.

I am a little curious to know how many space covers exist for different space missions. Maybe other cS members can add other space covers they have seen.

NAAmodel#240
Member

Posts: 312
From: Boston, Mass.
Registered: Jun 2005

posted 07-03-2016 03:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for NAAmodel#240   Click Here to Email NAAmodel#240     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
As a hobby I would favor a gradual move towards expanded ways of telling the story of the exploration of space through philately. In telling the tale of the first flights of STS an exhibitor could include component testing, aircraft simulation of shuttle characteristics, as well as suit qualifications and even naming of crews.

As a rule, however, we should ensure that the postmark is on the day of the event and at a nearby post office to the controlling event. Since the announcement was made at the Manned Space Flight Center, the Houston cancel is appropriate. I imagine before there was a MSFC the postmark would have read Washington, DC.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42985
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 07-03-2016 04:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by NAAmodel#240:
Since the announcement was made at the Manned Space Flight Center, the Houston cancel is appropriate.
By 1978, the Manned Spacecraft Center (MSC) had been renamed the Johnson Space Center for five years.
quote:
I imagine before there was a MSFC the postmark would have read Washington, DC.
The crew office prior to the move to Houston was based at Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia — though the press conference introducing the Mercury 7 astronauts was indeed at the Dolley Madison House (Little White House) in Washington, DC.

Antoni RIGO
Member

Posts: 176
From: Palma de Mallorca, Is. Baleares - SPAIN
Registered: Aug 2013

posted 07-04-2016 02:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Antoni RIGO   Click Here to Email Antoni RIGO     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Dave, I am absolutely agree with you.

In fact, in my first sentence "It is not yet in the Astrophilately rules" is hidden a real message of I hope it will be in the future.

I think that Astrophilately should be a real space history developed through space covers postmarked in exact date and near place.

The golden rule for Astrophilately should not change: covers postmarked in exact date and near place, but not only for launching, docking, undocking and return but also for test, probes, simulations, etc.

Opening Astrophilately to all kind of space events should not be a problem but an opportunity to attract more collectors, or maybe new collectors.

Sorry for this explanation not really linked to the title of the post.

Robert, thanks for the remarks.

NAAmodel#240
Member

Posts: 312
From: Boston, Mass.
Registered: Jun 2005

posted 07-04-2016 07:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for NAAmodel#240   Click Here to Email NAAmodel#240     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Robert, your specificity is appreciated on both counts. Would anyone care to weigh in if an announcement was made in Virginia and the decision was made in Washington what would constitute the "controlling entity"?

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement