Space News
space history and artifacts articles

space history discussion forums

worldwide astronaut appearances

selected space history documents

related space history websites

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Stamps & Covers
  Space Cover 133: Misunderstood Mercury-Scout

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Space Cover 133: Misunderstood Mercury-Scout

Posts: 1239
From: Washington, DC, USA
Registered: Apr 2003

posted 10-30-2011 04:32 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for micropooz   Click Here to Email micropooz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Space Cover of the Week, Week 133 (October 30, 2011)

Space Cover #133: The Misunderstood Mercury-Scout

Fifty years ago (and a couple of days), NASA launched Mercury-Scout from Cape Canaveral. The cover above was postmarked at Patrick AFB (a few miles down the beach from the Cape, and the HQ for the Air Force detachment at the Cape) on the launch date of November 1, 1961. It carries the Swanson self-service rubber-stamped cachet. An excellent Port Canaveral postmarked Goldcraft Cachet for this mission can be found here on fellow SU member Ross Smith’s website.

Mercury-Scout was a small, low-cost, unmanned communications beacon meant to test the Project Mercury tracking network before the first manned orbital flight. Mercury-Scout had ~18 hours of battery power, and was meant to simulate three three-orbit Mercury flights for the tracking network. It launched on a very small Scout launch vehicle (30 kG to orbit, which for us non-metric Luddites is ~66 lb, the size of a child). Unfortunately the Mercury-Scout launch vehicle’s first stage guidance system was mis-wired, causing the vehicle to go erratic seconds after launch, and be destroyed by the Range Control Officer. Since NASA had already tested the tracking network for one orbit on the unmanned Mercury-Atlas-4 (MA-4) in September, 1961, and was close to doing a three-orbit chimp flight (which ended up being MA-5 on November 29, 1961), it was felt that further Mercury-Scout tests were not warranted.

Now, I have seen a LOT of misconceptions about Mercury-Scout, including speculations that Scout was a candidate Mercury launch vehicle, and that Mercury-Scout was meant to be recovered. Well, the Scout launch vehicle could only launch a 66 lb payload to orbit, nowhere near the multi-thousand pound payload of a Mercury capsule. And the small unmanned satellite was meant to stay in orbit until its orbit naturally decayed, sending the satellite to destruction. However, it never got that far.

So, please don’t read more into Mercury-Scout than there was. It was simply a small, unmanned satellite that failed to reach orbit. But nonetheless, due the association with Project Mercury, covers for this flight still sell high ($50+).


Posts: 94
From: Douglasville, Ga U.S.A.
Registered: Nov 2009

posted 10-30-2011 07:34 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for bobslittlebro   Click Here to Email bobslittlebro     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Great rare cover Dennis!

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 1999-2012 All rights reserved.

Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a