|
Author
|
Topic: ISS Expedition 36 insignia
|
IconDesign29 Member Posts: 35 From: Houston, Texas Registered: Apr 2011
|
posted 10-17-2012 08:07 AM
I'd like to provide a little perspective on this updated version of the design as I knew going into this that these changes would not be popular with everyone.I appreciate Tim stepping in and confirming a few points until I was able to respond here. Unfortunately, the changes to this design were inadvertently a result of the reasoning behind the changes to the Expedition 37 design and the approval process for these patches is a lengthy and complicated one. I did indeed work directly with the crew on incorporating the new elements and I was the only artist involved in making these changes so this was not a case of someone having to change another artist's design. We came up with a number of different options to add the new elements and this version was the best overall option that everyone was happy with. Although I did specifically ask about including all of the elements you now see into the patch before I ever originally designed it, at the time, we decided to go for the sleeker, simpler, and overall bolder design that was approved a year ago. To this day, there has been an overwhelmingly positive response to the original design's uniqueness by both this community and the NASA community which is why the last thing anyone wanted to do was completely scrap original design and start over. So we all opted to do our best to maintain the originality of the design but also get all of the necessary elements in there as well. Does the new version suffer from this? Yes, I do feel we have lost a bit of that sleek simplicity the original had, but I believe it is still a tasteful and unique design and is one that I am still honored to have had the opportunity to create. I am so grateful I was given the freedom and trust to try something different and I believe this design will still pave the way for trying new techniques in the future. By the way, I don't want to post the hi-res artwork until NASA officially releases it, but I will say that it actually doesn't feel quite as busy as the patch does. The names have more breathing room in the artwork and are not as bold as the thread made them so the design doesn't feel as claustrophobic. As always, thanks for your support and feedback everyone! |
hoorenz Member Posts: 689 From: The Netherlands Registered: Jan 2003
|
posted 10-17-2012 11:06 AM
Blake, let me tell you that it is absolutely great that NASA decided to give you this opportunity: you are a very talented artist and your designs deserve to be flown in space! I realize you were faced with a very difficult task, having to add these elements to your design. I really hope that for your next patch, and I am sure there will be, the process will be much smoother. |
KAPTEC Member Posts: 482 From: Madrid, Spain Registered: Oct 2005
|
posted 10-17-2012 01:26 PM
quote: Originally posted by hoorenz: Blake, I really hope that for your next patch, and I am sure there will be, the process will be much smoother.
I think the same Blake, you deserve it and I'm sure you will get it. I think it is still being a great patch and, surely, if we had not seen the first version we would have liked this one more from the beginning.  |
IconDesign29 Member Posts: 35 From: Houston, Texas Registered: Apr 2011
|
posted 10-17-2012 03:02 PM
Thank you very much, gentlemen! The kind words and encouragement are greatly appreciated.This definitely was not a discouraging experience and I am still very excited about this being my first mission patch design! I thoroughly look forward to future opportunities and am not out of ideas yet!  |
GoesTo11 Member Posts: 965 From: Denver, CO USA Registered: Jun 2004
|
posted 10-17-2012 03:18 PM
Thought I'd mention that AB Emblem confirmed to me that they will not produce any more of Blake's original Exp. 36 patch. They have "a few" left in inventory, and some retailers like the Space Store have them, but they won't be re-stocked anywhere. |
dogcrew5369 Member Posts: 504 From: Statesville, NC Registered: Mar 2009
|
posted 10-17-2012 06:42 PM
Will this be the new norm of getting an early version patch and then the revised patch? Two in a row seems to start a trend. Will Expedition 38, 39, 40, etc. continue this new trend or should we look at 36 and 37 as an aberration? First there were debates whether to put names on the expedition patches and now the whole patch is up for debate. Scratching my head. |
KSCartist Member Posts: 2446 From: Titusville, FL USA Registered: Feb 2005
|
posted 10-17-2012 07:27 PM
Knowing what I do of the backstory, I believe that 36 and 37 will be an aberration. The patch work for 38, 39 40 and 41 is underway. Knowing who the artist is for a couple of them I expect we will be impressed. It's not me, by the way.  |
hoorenz Member Posts: 689 From: The Netherlands Registered: Jan 2003
|
posted 10-18-2012 11:22 AM
quote: Originally posted by dogcrew5369: Will Expedition 38, 39, 40, etc. continue this new trend?
Not if the first time we see any of these patches, is not also the first time the Expedition commander sees it. Nor is something he has seen, but he has rejected a couple of months earlier.
|
IconDesign29 Member Posts: 35 From: Houston, Texas Registered: Apr 2011
|
posted 10-18-2012 12:52 PM
I don't think we'll see these same issues again, Erik. I would expect the patches beyond Exp 37 to be fully approved prior to being released with no further changes needed. |
dogcrew5369 Member Posts: 504 From: Statesville, NC Registered: Mar 2009
|
posted 10-20-2012 12:15 AM
If the early version Expedition 36 patch was rejected why did I see Chris Cassidy wearing the unoffical version yesterday on NASA TV in Russia? And I picked up 3 from the Space Store yesterday. Rare or not I don't want to look back and wish. |
hoorenz Member Posts: 689 From: The Netherlands Registered: Jan 2003
|
posted 10-20-2012 11:26 AM
It was the first version of the 37 patch that was rejected, but was made into a patch.The first version of the 36 artwork was never rejected, but was simply not presented for approval to all members of the crew. Some 20 months before the start of the expedition, it was made into a patch and handed to them. This was so early, that some of the crew were still in the designing phase. Because NASA had already officially released the art, a compromise was reached to add the elements they had wanted to see, to Blake's design. So technically the first version of 36 is not 'rejected', but, with the others accepting the compromise, 'unfinished'. |
QuiGon Grin Member Posts: 35 From: Rutherford, NJ 07070 Registered: Apr 2010
|
posted 10-21-2012 08:41 PM
quote: Originally posted by IconDesign29: By the way, I don't want to post the hi-res artwork until NASA officially releases it, but I will say that it actually doesn't feel quite as busy as the patch does.
This was something I was wondering myself; if a logo version if on say paper, painted or "beta cloth" would look better as "thread count" wouldn't be involved. |
LM-12 Member Posts: 730 From: Ontario, Canada Registered: Oct 2010
|
posted 11-02-2012 07:42 PM
I think the updated version of the 36 design looks great. The dynamic design of the Expedition 36 patch portrays the International Space Station's (ISS) iconic solar arrays. The slanted angles denote a kinetic energy leading from the Earth in the lower right to the upper left tip of the triangular shape of the patch, representing the infinite scientific research, education, and long-duration spaceflight capabilities the ISS provides with each mission, as well as our goal for future exploration beyond the Space Station. The numbers 3 and 6 harmoniously intertwine to form expedition number 36 and its gray coloration signifies the unity and neutrality among all of the international partners of the ISS. The blue and gold color scheme of the patch represents the subtle way the central gold orbit wraps around the number 36 to form a trident at its lower right tip. The trident also symbolizes the sea, air, and land, all of which make up the Earth from where the trident originates in the design. |
SleeBaudrons New Member Posts: 6 From: Scotland Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted 03-12-2013 03:00 PM
I just received one of the first version ISS Expedition 36 patches and was surprised to see that it had a "Made in Taiwan" label on the back. If production had been shifted to the Far East, it implies that AB Emblem had completed the initial production run at its American factory. If so, considerable numbers of this patch might still be in circulation. |
hoorenz Member Posts: 689 From: The Netherlands Registered: Jan 2003
|
posted 03-12-2013 03:47 PM
Production of the first version already started in August 2011. AB Emblem got word that the patch would be replaced in August / September 2012, a full year later... |
MSS Member Posts: 356 From: Kolo, Poland Registered: May 2003
|
posted 03-18-2013 04:48 PM
Here is a photo with decal version of the patch at the far left column on the cabin wall. |
hoorenz Member Posts: 689 From: The Netherlands Registered: Jan 2003
|
posted 04-24-2013 10:43 AM
In this crop from a NASA image taken prior to Friday's spacewalk (and I have to admit you have to know what you are looking for) you can see in the background the design that Expedition 36 commander Pavel Vinogradov himself originally thought up for his crew. It is basically his earlier Expedition 13 patch (which he also designed), with an Italian instead of a German flag (I added an image of that patch as comparison). Although a compromise was reached last summer with Pavel to add the Moon, Mars, names and flags to the patch that NASA released, he decided to also fly his own design as a personal memento and display it aboard the Russian section of the ISS. (Together with the Soyuz TMA-08M patch, which — not coincidentally — happens to be in the shape of his earlier Soyuz TMA-8 design). |