Author
|
Topic: 336167903405: Gemini 8 crew-signed cover
|
randyc Member Posts: 957 From: Highlands Ranch, CO USA Registered: May 2003
|
posted 09-12-2025 02:10 PM
There's a Gemini 8 USS Leonard F. Mason cover that is 'signed' by the Gemini 8 crew on eBay. The eBay Item Number is: 336167903405. The signatures look a bit 'off' to me.Would appreciate knowing what other members of collectSPACE think about the signatures.  |
yeknom-ecaps Member Posts: 954 From: Northville MI USA Registered: Aug 2005
|
posted 09-12-2025 02:25 PM
Hence why "suspect" is in the title of the item... Gemini 8 Recovery USS Mason Suspect Crewsigned Space |
Ken Havekotte Member Posts: 4005 From: Merritt Island, Florida, Brevard Registered: Mar 2001
|
posted 09-12-2025 02:27 PM
Yes, by all means, very much suspect and best to stay away from it, but just my own opinion. |
randyc Member Posts: 957 From: Highlands Ranch, CO USA Registered: May 2003
|
posted 09-12-2025 04:48 PM
I saw that the description mentions that the signatures are 'suspect', but that's one person's opinion. And they could be wrong; the signatures could be genuine. That's why I was interested in additional opinions. |
onesmallstep Member Posts: 1536 From: Staten Island, New York USA Registered: Nov 2007
|
posted 09-12-2025 05:22 PM
I would stay away from that cover; yes, the Armstrong is very suspect but the Scott looks 'OK.' The reason I say that is the more 'complete' wording of 'Armstrong,' not rushed, is one he signed with in the early 60s, pre-astronaut selection, but the cover it's on was issued in 1964, for the NY World's Fair, so that in itself is a first clue. As he became swamped later with signing requests, he adopted a simplified, distinctive style for his last name especially. I suggest you look over Armstrong signature expert Steve Zarelli's website. |
Axman Member Posts: 811 From: Derbyshire UK Registered: Mar 2023
|
posted 09-13-2025 05:16 AM
I'm not convinced the Scott signature is genuine either. |
hbw60 Member Posts: 358 From: Registered: Aug 2018
|
posted 09-13-2025 04:42 PM
quote: Originally posted by onesmallstep: ...so that in itself is a first clue.
I agree that because this is Armstrong's pre-astronaut signature, it makes almost no sense for it to be signed on a Gemini-era postal cover. This type of signature was only used during his X-15 days, when he was notable enough to have people requesting his autograph, but not so famous that he needed to rush them.But I do want to point out that during this time, it was not uncommon for people to collect signed blank postal covers that could later be postmarked on important dates. For example, it's entirely possible that someone would get Armstrong to sign a blank envelope soon after he became an astronaut in 1962, and then wait to get it postmarked until his first spaceflight. That way, it would have both a notable signature and a notable postmark. I've seen several items like this in the past. I even own one - an Ellison Onizuka signed cover that was postmarked on the day of his memorial service after the Challenger disaster. Steve Zarelli has certified it as authentic, and noted the postmark on the LOA. So a later postmark doesn't automatically nullify it. However, I think the nature of this specific postmark does. This is actually a pretty special cover - it was postmarked onboard the USS "Leonard F. Mason" on March 17, 1966 - the date of Gemini 8's splashdown. In other words, this postal cover was actually onboard the ship when Armstrong and Scott were recovered. We know Armstrong didn't sign it at that point, because he would have used his 1966-style signature. So if this was a previously-signed cover which had been set aside for a later postmark, that means the owner was somehow able to arrange to have it onboard the recovery ship. That alone would be difficult. But it's even more extraordinary when we consider the fact that the "Leonard F. Mason" was just one of several backup ships. It was NOT the intended recovery vessel, and it was on the other side of the planet from the intended splashdown. It only became the prime recovery ship after Gemini 8 was forced to make an emergency landing. For this reason, "Leonard F. Mason" covers for Gemini 8 are by far the rarest of the Gemini splashdown covers. In short, for this to be a real signature, it would mean that the original owner had a blank pre-1963 signed postal cover, the ability to get it onboard a naval vessel during the Gemini 8 mission, AND the foresight to have it stowed on the exact backup ship that ended up recovering the spacecraft and crew. Even if the signature looked authentic (and I agree with the others that it does not), the postmark alone is overwhelming evidence that this signature is fake. |
astrobock Member Posts: 242 From: WV, USA Registered: Sep 2006
|
posted 09-13-2025 05:29 PM
I am by far an expert but pictures examples I have of this longer signature style, the "s" in Armstrong is emphasized. Here it is not. |
randyc Member Posts: 957 From: Highlands Ranch, CO USA Registered: May 2003
|
posted 09-18-2025 11:55 AM
The cover sold for $662.18. |