Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Publications & Multimedia
  Apollo 14: Hycon KA-7A camera photo scans

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Apollo 14: Hycon KA-7A camera photo scans
apollo16uvc
Member

Posts: 123
From: Next to LEM, Descartes Highlands, Moon
Registered: Jan 2017

posted 10-14-2018 01:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for apollo16uvc   Click Here to Email apollo16uvc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Disclaimer: This is a preview, and may be subject to change.

Apollo 14 took high-resolution photos of the lunar surface from orbit with a modified Hycon KA-7A Aerial Reconnaissance Camera. The results produced from these military-grade optics and large-format film would be of incredible high resolutions.

And while other large-format photos of the lunar surface taken on Apollo 15, 16 and 17 are online in a mind-boggling 4.8 Gigapixels, high enough to discern Apollo equipment at the landing sites, high-resolution scans of the Apollo 14 KA-7A photos are missing.

The magazines used in the KA-7A camera were numbered AS14-79 and AS14-80.

First, below is a list of currently online sources for these photos, albeit in low and moderate resolution. (To my knowledge)

  1. Scans of Apollo 14 image catalog by Awe130
    Notes: Awe130 has high-resolution scans of his catalog, but does not want to publish them. Perhaps someone from here can request access to the high-res scans?

  2. Scans of Apollo 14 image catalog by NASA
    Notes: As14-80 frames start at PDF file page 9.

  3. Scans of Apollo 14 science report
    Notes: page 282 til 288

  4. Two AS14-80 frames scanned from (presumed) prints, see two links bottom page

  5. Various images from his own, and other sources, as provided by Paul (cS: One Big Monkey).

  6. The U.S. National Archives has two frames: 6.1, 6.2
So why am I making this reply? Because I have acquired ten 20"x24" inch prints of magazine AS14-80 and together with Paul (cS: One Big Monkey), am working on scanning and processing them.

We will present an other source for the images, and in much greater resolution and fidelity than previously online. Most of our scans were previously only available as ultra-low resolution scans from the Apollo 14 photo catalog.

We will be providing the highest-resolution scans of these photos online to date.

I use my Epson Perfection V750 Pro to scan the gargantuan print in six sections, making sure there is ample overlap between the scans. Vuescan 9 outputs two files, a contrast/brightness enhanced scan, and the uncorrected RAW scan. Both files are saved as 16-bit grayscale uncompressed TIFFs. Sharp prints are scanned at 800 DPI, soft prints are scanned at 300 DPI.

Paul then uses Photoshop to merge the six individual scans back into a single image. The combined scan is saved in two versions; the uncorrected RAW version, and a contrast enhanced, sharpened version to try and get the most detail out of the prints possible. Due to the nature of this process, there may be some visible stitching where two scans meet.

The resultant image resolution is 307 Megapixels.

A photo of one of the prints: AS14-80-10503

A full HD preview of the links below:
AS14-80-10441

Once all the prints have been scanned and processed all the individual scans and merges will be provided, in RAW and enhanced.

Please tell me what you think! I and Paul would like feedback.

apollo16uvc
Member

Posts: 123
From: Next to LEM, Descartes Highlands, Moon
Registered: Jan 2017

posted 10-21-2018 11:07 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for apollo16uvc   Click Here to Email apollo16uvc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Some grand comparisons by Paul:

AS14-80-10441: LRO on the left, Apollo 14 Hycon on the right.

AS14-80-10503: This print was not sharp, so I only scanned at 300DPI. The resolution is still good:

Here is a list with the photos and the progression:

  • 10412: Not yet scanned!
  • 10441: Individual scans, merged.
  • 10444: Individual scans, merged.
  • 10453: Individual scans, merged.
  • 10455: Individual scans, not yet merged.
  • 10459: Individual scans, merged.
  • 10466: Individual scans, not yet merged.
  • 10503: Individual scans, merged.
  • 10518: Not yet scanned!
  • 10535: Individual scans, merged.

apollo16uvc
Member

Posts: 123
From: Next to LEM, Descartes Highlands, Moon
Registered: Jan 2017

posted 10-30-2018 12:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for apollo16uvc   Click Here to Email apollo16uvc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
After several months of hard work, this project comes to a close. I'd like to thank everybody for their help and insight.

All of the 10 prints have been scanned and can be found on archive.org.

AS14-80 prints:
Subject: 20x24" b/w darkroom prints
Medium: 20x24" darkroom paper
Scanner: Epson Perfection V750 Pro
Scan software: Vuescan 9
OS: Windows 10
Scan Resolution: Between 300 and 800 DPI, depends on print sharpness.
File extension: Tiff

Notes:
!LARGE FILE SIZES!
File size of individual frames varies from 17 to 125MB.
File size of merges varies from 124mb to 600mb.

Each print is scanned in six sections, making sure there is ample overlap between the scans. Vuescan 9 outputs two files, a contrast/brightness enhanced scan, and the uncorrected RAW scan. Both files are saved as 16-bit grayscale uncompressed TIFFs. Sharp prints are scanned at 800 DPI, soft prints are scanned at 300 DPI.

Paul (One Big Monkey) then uses Photoshop to merge the six individual scans back into a single image. The combined scan is saved in two versions; the uncorrected RAW version, and a contrast enhanced, sharpened version to try and get the most detail out of the prints possible. Due to the nature of this process, there may be some visible stitching where scans meet.

Individual scans provided as AS14-80-10###-C#-I#-F#, merged files uploaded with "merge-C#-I#"" suffix.

C1I1= Colour fade/cast correction enabled. ICE Infrared Spot/dust removal enabled set to light. I2 = set to medium. Highlight / dark values enhancement for greater contrast, usually very conservative to not blow highlights/dark values.

C0I0 / RAW = Colour fade/cast correction disabled. ICE Infrared Spot/dust removal disabled. Unprocessed scan.

F## = frame number of set or single image scanned in multiple sections.

Below is a list of full-res merged files as JPGs (Between 8 and 75 MB each)

  1. AS14-80-10412
  2. AS14-80-10441
  3. AS14-80-10444
  4. AS14-80-10453
  5. AS14-80-10455
  6. AS14-80-10459
  7. AS14-80-10466
  8. AS14-80-10503
  9. AS14-80-10518
  10. AS14-80-10535
Paul will continue to look at the files in closer detail and compare them to other space missions to the moon, as seen in my previous posts. New developments will be posted here.

I am always searching for more of these photos, so if you know any please notify me, so I can try and get it online. If you are interested in having one of these prints, send me an email. — Niels

apollo16uvc
Member

Posts: 123
From: Next to LEM, Descartes Highlands, Moon
Registered: Jan 2017

posted 11-08-2018 09:20 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for apollo16uvc   Click Here to Email apollo16uvc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yesterday I received all AS14-79 and AS14-80 photos from the NSSDCA. Looks like a film copy "scanned" with a Nikon D750 and 60mm micro nikkor.

The 25mb TIFF files are problematic to open, it seems that in addition to the full resolution (6004 by 4002) photo there is a preview and thumbnail view in the file. So there are three photos in one file. It's only correctly opened with software that understands Nikon RAW. I will convert the files to something common for publication.

Unfortunately "old style" jpeg compression is used in the files, so when you zoom in you see JPG compression blocks. I have asked if the NSSDCA can supply NIKON. NEF files without compression.

I will keep this topic updated.

apollo16uvc
Member

Posts: 123
From: Next to LEM, Descartes Highlands, Moon
Registered: Jan 2017

posted 11-11-2018 10:55 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for apollo16uvc   Click Here to Email apollo16uvc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Does anybody have pictures of the Apollo 14 Hycon camera mounted on the command module main window?

(Disclaimer: I and Paul are not from NASA or endorsed by them. We are doing this in our own free time.)

This archive contains 251 photos taken on Apollo 14 by a modified Hycon KA-7A camera. These magazines were designated as AS14-79 and AS14-80.

I would like to thank the NSSDCA for scanning and providing magazine AS14-79 and AS14-80. I would like to thank Paul for processing the NSSDCA .TIFF files.

These photos were acquired by requesting NSSDCA dataset PSPG-00256. A film or digital copy of AS14-79 and AS14-80 was requested. The NSSDCA scanned a film for this request and several months later the resultant digital dataset was provided.

Each file is 23 MB and has a resolution of 6016*4016 pixels.

The NSSDCA provided TIFF files appear to be Nikon D750 raw files, which can only be correctly opened with special software. Paul was kind enough to batch-process all raw files. Each file was put through a DNG converted, Photoshop will then allow it to be imported normally. This caused the images to turn brown, which was corrected by turning them grayscale.

Thanks everybody for your support.

heng44
Member

Posts: 3386
From: Netherlands
Registered: Nov 2001

posted 11-11-2018 10:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for heng44   Click Here to Email heng44     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This photo was released for Apollo 13, but I assume the setup is the same.

One Big Monkey
Member

Posts: 169
From: West Yorkshire, UK
Registered: Jul 2012

posted 11-13-2018 02:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for One Big Monkey     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
That's an excellent photograph - gives a real feel of what a beast of a camera it was! I've read in the documentation that it was mounted in the crew hatch window in the command module for Apollo 14, so yes it should be the same.

I have now completed as much detective work as I can on the photographs. It seems that the last image with any discernible feature on it was taken on the western edge of a crater south west of Lindsay (AS14-80-10765).

However the last photograph with any useful detail in it is AS14-80-10641 (roughly 63 km from the future Apollo 16 landing site), and arguably this one is where things started to go wrong as it seems very blurred in the bottom left corner.

Magazine 79's images took more tracking down. The transcript implied that Roosa did some testing with this magazine soon after magazine 80 failed after discussion with Houston. Careful examination of the terrain under the flight path showed this wasn't the case, so it was back to the transcript where we find this:

I did not take the LTC photo target 16; I figured that Gordon had implied that it might be a waste of film to shoot them this way; I thought maybe we could get it fixed, we could save the film. I did shoot the landing because I figured, even if it is working - that one we wouldn't have another chance at. And I fired 39 frames off of magazine B [the transcript refers to 'B' a couple of times, I believe it's an error] on the landing per the pad. I don't know whether it will turn out or not, because it - it clanked and fluttered the whole time.
He did indeed capture the landing site. The image below shows the images supplied from this magazine compiled as a montage and superimposed over the LRO map. The red dot marks the Apollo landing site:

LM-12
Member

Posts: 3207
From: Ontario, Canada
Registered: Oct 2010

posted 11-18-2018 11:40 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for LM-12     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by heng44:
This photo was released for Apollo 13
The Apollo 13 plans included Lunar Topographic Camera photos of the LM landing at 103:40 GET, the landed LM at 107:35 GET, and the LM impact at 145:00 GET.

One Big Monkey
Member

Posts: 169
From: West Yorkshire, UK
Registered: Jul 2012

posted 11-18-2018 04:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for One Big Monkey     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Still with Apollo 13, the ALSJ has a description of AS13-62-9004 that suggests parts of the Hycon were used in the CO2 scrubber they built on board.

I can see no reference to that in the transcript, and all the hoses they refer to are from the suits. I've emailed the ALSJ for clarification.

LM-12
Member

Posts: 3207
From: Ontario, Canada
Registered: Oct 2010

posted 11-18-2018 08:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for LM-12     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by One Big Monkey:
And I fired 39 frames off of magazine B [the transcript refers to 'B' a couple of times, I believe it's an error] on the landing per the pad.
The Apollo 14 LTC magazines were 79(V) and 80(W).

apollo16uvc
Member

Posts: 123
From: Next to LEM, Descartes Highlands, Moon
Registered: Jan 2017

posted 09-15-2019 02:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for apollo16uvc   Click Here to Email apollo16uvc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I have donated one of the prints to the Tivoli Observatory, a small Dutch observatory that aims to educate the public about astronomy.

The print has been hung on a wall for visitors to see. Visitors will be able to use a magnifying glass to see surface, rock and crater detail. Ed's photo is seen at the bottom right, Paul and my scanning work is seen on the right middle frame.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement