|
Author
|
Topic: "First Man" Neil Armstrong movie update
|
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 12300 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted April 16, 2007 02:55 PM
Sources tell collectSPACE.com:Warner Brothers' and Clint Eastwood's option on James Hansen's authorized biography of Neil Armstrong, First Man expired on March 1 and was not renewed. Reportedly, Eastwood felt that the film would require "too much heavy lifting" in light of having just tackled two very large projects on Iwo Jima. When word got out that Eastwood had stepped out, other production companies and studios stepped in. Reportedly, the most serious of those interests is from 21 Laps Entertainment and director Shawn Levy (Night at the Museum and the upcoming movie adaptation of The Flash), working with Twentieth Century Fox. 21 Laps has looked to screenwriter Nicole Perlman (no relation) to develop a screenplay based on First Man. Perlman previously wrote the screenplay for Challenger, the upcoming film about Richard Feynman and the 1986 space shuttle accident, directed by Philip Kaufman. Reportedly, Perlman and Hansen have been in touch. The next step is for Hansen and Perlman to present their ideas for the screenplay to 21 Laps executives next month, followed a few weeks later by a pitch to the studio. IP: Logged |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 12300 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted April 02, 2008 10:10 AM
Variety: Universal puts 'First Man' into orbit quote: Studio acquires Hansen's Neil Armstrong tomeUniversal has acquired nonfiction tome "First Man: The Life of Neil A. Armstrong" and will turn it into a film about the first person to set foot on the moon. NASA historian James R. Hansen got rare direct access to Armstrong, a test pilot-turned-astronaut who was so driven to reach the moon and play the role of American hero that he became known as "the Ice Commander." Nicole Perlman will write the script. Temple Hill Entertainment partners Marty Bowen and Wyck Godfrey produce. "The closer he got to the moon, the further away he became from his family," Perlman said. "He had a family tragedy before Apollo that turned him into this driven astronaut, and he became such a perfect hero that while Buzz Aldrin was announced to be the first man on the moon, NASA reversed its decision because Neil was regarded as more heroic." Armstrong returned from the moon as one of the most famous men on Earth but didn't capitalize on it with a political career or endorsements. He reconnected with his family, shut out the world and became an intensely private man. Perlman just rewrote her script "Challenger, a project about Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman's investigation into the 1986 Space Shuttle tragedy. Originally set up at Media 8 with "The Right Stuff" helmer Phil Kaufman, "Challenger" now has Nathaniel Kahn ("My Architect") attached to direct, and it will go out to financiers shortly. Perlman is also scripting "Kiss and Tango" for Fox 2000, and she is writing a pic about the Wright brothers for National Geographic Films based on the book "One Day at Kitty Hawk" by John Evangelist Walsh.
IP: Logged |
mjanovec Member Posts: 2024 From: Midwest, USA Registered: Jul 2005
|
posted April 02, 2008 10:30 AM
quote: "The closer he got to the moon, the further away he became from his family," Perlman said. "He had a family tragedy before Apollo that turned him into this driven astronaut, and he became such a perfect hero that while Buzz Aldrin was announced to be the first man on the moon, NASA reversed its decision because Neil was regarded as more heroic."
Is this going to be The Right Stuff Part 2? I hope there is a little more emphasis on fact in the movie than this quote would indicate. IP: Logged |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 12300 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted April 02, 2008 11:02 AM
My understanding is that Perlman was misunderstood or misquoted by Variety. She is well aware of the facts as presented in "First Man" and would not have made an error such as saying that Aldrin was announced to be first. Hansen's work does address the decision as to why Armstrong went first (citing Kraft for the part about Armstrong's character) but it also addresses the reasons that are presented by the historical record.Although I have yet to see the screenplay, based on what I know of Hansen's and Perlman's work, I would suggest that the Variety article does not reflect the nature of the film. IP: Logged |
Moonwalker1954 Member Posts: 166 From: Montreal, Canada Registered: Jul 2004
|
posted April 02, 2008 11:25 AM
quote: NASA historian James R. Hansen got rare direct access to Armstrong, a test pilot-turned-astronaut who was so driven to reach the moon and play the role of American hero that he became known as "the Ice Commander."
I thought that that nickname was for Al Shepard?!Pierre-Yves IP: Logged |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 12300 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted April 02, 2008 11:41 AM
Shepard's nickname was the "icy commander".Citing "First Man" (softcover edition), page 436: quote: All across the Moon's rocky back side, the part never visible from the Earth and densely pockmarked by 4.6 billion years of meteroid bombardment, Aldrin and Collins excitedly pointed out one spectacular feature after another, while the "Ice Commander," as a few astronauts privately had come to call Armstrong, was more restrained in expressing what was his own genuine enthusiasm.
Also, quoting Thomas Mallon's review of "First Man" in The New Yorker: quote: After Gemini 8, other astronauts began calling [Armstrong] the "ice commander"...
On edit: Hansen attributes the title "Ice Commander" to Gene Cernan in the end notes of "First Man", as it is the title of the Apollo 11-focused chapter in Cernan's own book, "Last Man on the Moon". If that was the only reference, then I believe it would be in error, as Cernan defines the "ice commander" later in that chapter as referring to Alan Shepard, however I understand from Hansen that there was additional interview material to support the citation: quote: Hansen: In your book (Last Man on the Moon), you have a chapter entitled "The Ice Commander," a nickname that some of you guys used for Al Shepard. But the dramatic highpoint of that chapter in terms of events at least is the landing of Apollo 11. So in a way doesn't the reader get the impression that you are also referring to Armstrong as "The Ice Commander" or at least "The Ice Commander" type?Cernan: I hadn't thought about that, but, yes, Neil was also an "Ice Commander," if in a different way than Al. Hansen: Do you know if anyone ever called Neil the Ice Commander? Cernan: Oh, someone probably did. In a joking way, Al himself might have thrown that back at us.
IP: Logged |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 12300 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted April 13, 2008 02:31 PM
There's an odd article from the Guardian in which it describes critics bandying about actors' names for the roles of Armstrong and Aldrin in the upcoming "First Man" film adaptation. What's odd about it that it mentions a meeting/event "last night" but never defines what/where it was...(The article also makes the common error of thinking that "One small step..." was scripted, when all indications are that Armstrong devised the line during the flight.) Hollywood hunts star to play first man on the Moon quote: It was one small step for man but could be one giant leap in the career of an actor. Neil Armstrong, the first man on the Moon, is to be the subject of a Hollywood biopic. The only question now is: who is worthy of filling the spaceboots of the 20th-century icon who 'came in peace for all mankind'?
IP: Logged |
Wehaveliftoff Member Posts: 567 From: Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted April 14, 2008 09:51 AM
My vote is for Matt Damon or Chad Lowe!!IP: Logged |
jimsz Member Posts: 106 From: Registered: Aug 2006
|
posted April 14, 2008 12:00 PM
I would vote for Tom Hanks.IP: Logged |
fabfivefreddy Member Posts: 988 From: Leawood, Kansas USA Registered: Oct 2003
|
posted April 14, 2008 03:36 PM
Ed HarrisTahir IP: Logged |
astro-nut Member Posts: 94 From: washington, Illinois USA Registered: Jan 2006
|
posted April 14, 2008 04:03 PM
How about the actor that played Neil Armstrong in "From The Earth To the Moon" series??IP: Logged |
Naraht Member Posts: 232 From: Oxford, UK Registered: Mar 2006
|
posted April 14, 2008 05:51 PM
quote: Originally posted by fabfivefreddy: Ed Harris
Now that would be interesting. He might be a bit too old for the part, though? IP: Logged |
ColinBurgess Member Posts: 1012 From: Sydney, Australia Registered: Sep 2003
|
posted April 14, 2008 07:26 PM
Most of those preferred actors (Hanks, Harris, etc.) are way too old to play the role of Armstrong, but my personal choice is Matt Damon, who not only resembles Armstrong a little, but is now the same age as Armstrong was when he stepped onto the moon.IP: Logged |
Matt T Member Posts: 1150 From: Chester, Cheshire, UK Registered: May 2001
|
posted April 15, 2008 02:31 AM
The only problem with Matt Damon is that he is typically too 'Hollywood-heroic' in his movie roles these days to play a realistic Armstrong. I'd worry that his inclusion could push the film in the 'Right Stuff' direction.I think you'd need someone a little more complex & offbeat to really capture Armstrong. Cheers, Matt ------------------ www.spaceracemuseum.com IP: Logged |
mikelarson Member Posts: 223 From: Tokyo, Japan Registered: Jan 2005
|
posted April 15, 2008 10:11 AM
Matt Damon, hands down. With Universal behind the project it's going to get somewhat heroic no matter who they choose because that's what brings in the moviegoers and they are a big production studio with stockholders. Tom Hanks is the only guy I can think of that could have pulled off Apollo 13 the way he did, and besides his age they would never cast him in the lead of another Apollo-related movie. That would just confuse average people who would think it's a sequel to A13. But Matt is versatile enough to play a serious role, too, in addition to his action hero skills. Don't forget how he got his start with Good Will Hunting. And Matt is by far the most intellectual of today's current big name actors and has a great screen presence. And he's Jason Bourne!! Did I mention that? On a side note, I haven't yet read the book but I hope Buzz, Mike, and the rest of the team aren't left in the shadows. That was one of the things that made Apollo 13 great, is that it wasn't about just one person. Might be tough though given the entire basis for the story is Armstrong. I wonder what the movie will do for the price of Armstrong autographs. They can't go any higher, can they?? Mike IP: Logged |
Wehaveliftoff Member Posts: 567 From: Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted April 15, 2008 11:30 AM
Matt T, Mr. Damon is one of the most versatile actors out there, meaning 'complex' and 'off beat' is well within his skill level. Suggest watching the movie "The Talented Mr. Ripley" as he can play someone way out there.
IP: Logged |
jimsz Member Posts: 106 From: Registered: Aug 2006
|
posted April 15, 2008 11:59 AM
I would be in the anyone but Matt Damon.He is good for what he does but certainly has little charisma or nuance to his performances. I still say Hanks. Age correctness in a film means little if the acting and writing are quality. IP: Logged |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 12300 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted April 15, 2008 12:17 PM
While Hanks and crew (no pun intended) did a very commendable job portraying the Apollo 13 astronauts, given that this will (presumably) be a bio-pic rather than a mission-driven story, the actor chosen needs to capture all aspects of Armstrong's life. While I am not saying that Damon or another "name-brand" actor couldn't do that, I wonder if there wouldn't be some merit of hiring outside the usual suspects and getting an unknown to play the part. In that sense, he would also capture the lack of familiarity most movie goers have with the real Armstrong.You could then use your more bankable stars in supporting roles, such as having Ed Harris reprise his role as Gene Kranz. I also hope the film will spend time on Armstrong's first mission, Gemini 8, and therefore have an equally strong actor in the role of Dave Scott. IP: Logged |
gliderpilotuk Member Posts: 1652 From: London, UK Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted April 16, 2008 04:59 AM
I agree. From the Earth to the Moon contained largely unknown actors who managed to carry off the astronaut resemblances very well. This enhanced the experience. IMO people will largely want to see the film for the man it portrays not for some "A" lister who would detract and probably distort the story. After all this is to be a biographical film, not a tear-jerking, war-winning, history-distorting "epic".Paul IP: Logged |
capoetc Member Posts: 598 From: Camden DE (USA) Registered: Aug 2005
|
posted April 16, 2008 09:04 AM
However, the purpose of the film will likely be to make money... creating a film for posterity might be nice too, but the producers will likely want some star power to put people in the seats at the theater.The screenwriter has his work cut out for him, too. I can't imagine filming the movie along the lines of the book -- I would think they might use the storyline of the Apollo 11 mission with flashbacks to cover the biographical parts. It seems to me that the really hard part will be making it "exciting". Not to say that Neil Armstrong's life so far hasn't been exciting -- it's just that when exciting things happened to him, he handled them in a sober and methodical way. Such as... when the LLTV went berserk and he ejected with one second to spare... no big deal, you eject, gather up the parachute, and then head to the office to do some paperwork. If they try to turn it into some kind of emotional, "Oh my God, I could have been killed" kind of moment, then it won't capture his personality. Definitely an interesting challenge. ------------------ John Capobianco Camden DE IP: Logged |
mikelarson Member Posts: 223 From: Tokyo, Japan Registered: Jan 2005
|
posted April 17, 2008 05:05 AM
I agree, any movie of this magnitude has to have some star power. It sounds like From Earth to the Moon was a completely different type of production than this is going to be. It will be interesting to see how the story plays out on the big screen. It's does seem like a tough story to convert to the big screen. But it's been done with others that I didn't think were possible. Mike
IP: Logged |
Wehaveliftoff Member Posts: 567 From: Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted April 17, 2008 10:51 AM
Jismz, Having met both Neil and Matt, Matt has zillions more charisma than Neil. How do you surmise anything but? Plus, it's light years away from any conclusion that this film will even be made...IP: Logged |
Jim Member Posts: 65 From: Dallas TX Registered: Mar 2006
|
posted April 17, 2008 04:33 PM
quote: Originally posted by mikelarson: On a side note, I haven't yet read the book but I hope Buzz, Mike, and the rest of the team aren't left in the shadows.
I also hope they don't give short shrift to his Gemini VIII flight. From what I understand, many considered GT-8 to be a failure, but if it had gone the full planned mission and Armstrong hadn't gotten to prove his calmness under pressure -- would he have been selected to command Apollo 11?Jim IP: Logged |