Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Space History Photo of the Week
  Photo of the week 550 (May 9, 2015)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Photo of the week 550 (May 9, 2015)
heng44
Member

Posts: 3387
From: Netherlands
Registered: Nov 2001

posted 05-09-2015 02:59 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for heng44   Click Here to Email heng44     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Apollo command module boilerplate #22 atop Little Joe II launch vehicle 12-51-2 is awaiting launch from Launch Complex 36 at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico. The spacecraft was launched May 19, 1965, to test the launch escape system. Also known as A-003, this was the fourth abort test of the Apollo spacecraft. During the launch an actual abort situation occurred, but the LES successfully pulled BP-22 away from the malfunctioning Little Joe and it landed safely under parachutes.

stsmithva
Member

Posts: 1933
From: Fairfax, VA, USA
Registered: Feb 2007

posted 05-09-2015 05:30 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for stsmithva   Click Here to Email stsmithva     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
One of my favorite scenes in the excellent Science Channel documentary "Moon Machines" occurred during this "successful failure." Sure, it showed that they had work to do on the booster's gyroscopes, but the fact that the rocket started to roll, eventually tearing itself apart, caused a perfect test of the escape tower.

If you'd like to see this 2-3 minute scene, you could start at 12:45.

Jonnyed
Member

Posts: 396
From: Dumfries, VA, USA
Registered: Aug 2014

posted 05-09-2015 09:58 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jonnyed   Click Here to Email Jonnyed     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Terrific photo and story. Sorry to ask such a fundamental question (I'm a nuclear engineer not an aerospace engineer) but what is the intent of the launch pad cant angle? To ensure some movement downrange and away from the pad itself during most malfunction scenarios?

onesmallstep
Member

Posts: 1310
From: Staten Island, New York USA
Registered: Nov 2007

posted 05-09-2015 01:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for onesmallstep   Click Here to Email onesmallstep     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Also the angle (which can be changed) is necessary to adjust to the wind direction to enable recovery by parachute within a designated area. The same applies to its smaller-scale cousins, toy model rockets launched from its own adjustable launch platform.

Jonnyed
Member

Posts: 396
From: Dumfries, VA, USA
Registered: Aug 2014

posted 05-12-2015 08:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jonnyed   Click Here to Email Jonnyed     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Were there any Saturn V launch disaster scenarios (post ignition) where even this escape tower system would prove to be ineffective? Or did it cover 99.9% of the scenarios?

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement