Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

Websites
related space history websites

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Exploration: Asteroids, Moon and Mars
  Report: NASA Evaluating Proposal to Drag Asteroid to Lunar Orbit

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Report: NASA Evaluating Proposal to Drag Asteroid to Lunar Orbit
SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 3023
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 01-06-2013 08:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The New Scientist reports confirmation via the Keck institute for Space Studies that NASA officials are entertaining an option to capture and place a small asteroid in lunar orbit:
Researchers with the Keck Institute for Space Studies in California have confirmed that NASA is mulling over their plan to build a robotic spacecraft to grab a small asteroid and place it in high lunar orbit. The mission would cost about $2.6 billion – slightly more than NASA's Curiosity Mars rover – and could be completed by the 2020s.

For now, NASA's only official plans for human spaceflight involve sending a crewed capsule, called Orion, around the moon. The Obama administration has said it also wants to send astronauts to a near-Earth asteroid. One proposed target, chosen because of its scientific value and favourable launch windows for a rendezvous, is a space rock called 1999 AO10. The mission would take about half a year, exposing astronauts to long-term radiation beyond Earth's protective magnetic field and taking them beyond the reach of any possible rescue.

Robotically bringing an asteroid to the moon instead would be a more attractive first step, the Keck researchers conclude, because an object orbiting the moon would be in easier reach of robotic probes and maybe even humans.

The Keck team envisions launching a slow-moving spacecraft, propelled by solar-heated ions, on an Atlas V rocket. The craft would then propel itself out to a target asteroid, probably a small space rock about 7 metres wide. After studying it briefly, the robot would catch the asteroid in a bag measuring about 10 metres by 15 metres and head back towards the moon. Altogether it would take about six to 10 years to deliver the asteroid to lunar orbit.

issman1
Member

Posts: 888
From: UK
Registered: Apr 2005

posted 01-06-2013 01:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for issman1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Good practice if you're worried about a potential impactor, but it makes more sense to send a crew to a distant asteroid.

Frankly, I'm appalled and shocked at some these pie-in-the-sky schemes proposed by NASA scientists to persuade shortsighted politicians of the rationale of sending NASA astronauts beyond the ISS orbit.

Don't we already have a natural and well-replenished space station in the form of our Moon? Just reboot Constellation by using the architecture of some of the private companies like Bigelow, Golden Spike and SpaceX. NASA should focus on the hurdles of overcoming radiation exposure and reducing flight times or even developing that sci-fi favourite artificial gravity.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 1999-2012 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement