Author
|
Topic: Qian Xuesen, father of China's space program
|
dom Member Posts: 904 From: Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted 10-31-2009 12:03 PM
Beijing news agencies are reporting that Tsien Hsue-shen (Qian Xuesen) - the founder of the Chinese space program - has died on 31 October 2009, aged 98. China's keystone space scientist Qian Xuesen, widely acclaimed as the country's "father of space technology" and "king of rocketry", died of illness here Saturday morning at the age of 98.In 1956, based on Qian's position paper on the country's defense and aviation industry, the central government set up an aviation industry committee, which later became the leading organization for China's missile and aviation programs. Under the guidance of Qian, also known as Tsien Hsue-shen, China finished the blueprint on developing jet and rocket technology. He also played a significant role in developing the country's first artificial earth satellite. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 44918 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 10-31-2009 01:20 PM
In addition to the role Qian Xuesen played for China's space program, he also contributed greatly to the United States' early rocketry efforts. To quote Wikipedia: In 1943, Tsien and two others in the Caltech rocketry group drafted the first document to use the name Jet Propulsion Laboratory; it was a proposal to the Army to develop missiles in response to Germany's V-2 rocket. This led to the Private A, which flew in 1944, and later the Corporal, the WAC Corporal, etc.During the Second World War, he was amongst many scientists who participated in the "Manhattan Project". After World War II he served under von Karman as a consultant to the United States Army Air Force, and was eventually given the "assimilated rank of colonel". Von Karman and Tsien were sent by the Army to Germany to investigate the progress of wartime aerodynamics research. Tsien investigated research facilities and interviewed German scientists such as Wernher von Braun and Rudolph Hermann. Von Karman wrote of Tsien, "At the age of 36, he was an undisputed genius whose work was providing an enormous impetus to advances in high-speed aerodynamics and jet propulsion." During this time, Colonel Tsien worked on a designing an intercontinental space plane Tsien Space Plane 1949. His work would inspire the X-20 Dyna-Soar which would later be the inspiration for the Space Shuttle. |
dom Member Posts: 904 From: Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted 10-31-2009 04:44 PM
Anyone who has read "Thread of the Silkworm" by Iris Chang realises that Qian's academic career at Caltech/JPL was destroyed when he lost his security clearance during the worst of McCarthy era "communist spy" mania.The fact that he was kept under "house arrest" in the US for five years (to try to prevent what he had in his head falling into Chinese hands if he returned home) only adds insult to injury. Who knows what contribution he would have made to the future US space program if all this hadn't of happened? |
SpaceAholic Member Posts: 4677 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 10-31-2009 10:11 PM
It was his decision to return to China and help the Maoist regime (he actually became a card carrying member of the Chinese Communist Party) in order to practice his tradecraft. If Xuesen had altruistic intentions he could have gone elsewhere and/or applied his talents towards peaceful purposes. |
dom Member Posts: 904 From: Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted 11-01-2009 04:09 AM
In total he spent 20 years in America, the last five of which he spent trying not to be deported. It was the U.S. government who had included him on a list of 110 "suspects" who were eventually traded for American GIs captured in Korea. This list had been drawn-up because these Chinese-born scientist "might" be a danger to national security.There is still no intelligence that his loyalties were anywhere else but with his academic colleagues at Caltech. That he then became a "card carrying member of the Chinese Communist Party" on his return, in totalitarian systems you often don't have much of a choice. I would rate Tsien alongside Wernher von Braun and Sergei Korolev — men who also didn't let altruism get in the way of using a totalitarian regime to build their rockets — in importance to the history of the space age. |
DChudwin Member Posts: 1113 From: Lincolnshire IL USA Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 11-01-2009 08:44 AM
There is a balanced obituary of Qian in the LA Times, which gives consideration to both sides of thought about this eminent rocket scientist. He was the founding director of the Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Jet Propulsion Center at Caltech and a member of the university’s so-called Suicide Squad of rocket experimenters who laid the groundwork for testing done by JPL.But his brilliant career in the United States came to a screeching halt in 1950, when the FBI accused him of being a member of a subversive organization. Qian packed up eight crates of belongings and set off for Shanghai, saying he and his wife and two young children wanted to visit his aging parents back home. Federal agents seized the containers, which they claimed contained classified materials, and arrested him on suspicion of subversive activity. Qian denied any Communist leanings, rejected the accusation that he was trying to spirit away secret information and initially fought deportation. He later changed course, however, and sought to return to China. Like von Braun, Qian employed his talents for a dictatorship in his ancestral homeland. It is easy to look back and criticize, but what should great scientists/engineers do if they are living in such a situation? There are real moral dilemmas involved, and no easy solutions. |
minipci Member Posts: 393 From: London, UK Registered: Jul 2009
|
posted 10-27-2020 08:42 AM
Here is a programme on BBC World Service about Qian Xuesen and a related article. In Shanghai there is an entire museum containing 70,000 artefacts dedicated to one man, "the people's scientist" Qian Xuesen.Qian is the father of China's missile and space programme. His research helped develop the rockets that fired China's first satellite into space, and missiles that became part of its nuclear arsenal, and he is revered as a national hero. But in another superpower, where he studied and worked for more than a decade, his significant contributions are rarely remembered at all. |
David C Member Posts: 1176 From: Lausanne Registered: Apr 2012
|
posted 10-27-2020 09:07 AM
But his brilliant career in the United States came to a screeching halt in 1950, when the FBI accused him of being a member of a subversive organization. Seems to me the real fault here is with the paranoid "red's under the bed" lobby, quite probably with a bit of (possibly unconscious) racism thrown in for good measure, and the FBI who in the end gave the opposition a gift. |
SpaceAholic Member Posts: 4677 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 10-27-2020 12:53 PM
There is a long record of Chinese nationals engaging in economic, industrial and national security espionage against the U.S.; the default rational does not require paranoia or "racism" to act on behalf of this country's interest. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 44918 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 10-27-2020 01:36 PM
As the BBC article cites, "there is no evidence that Qian ever spied for China or was an intelligence agent when he was in the US." He was first accused of being a spy among a group that was entirely Chinese and Jewish, which suggests a racist motive. And he joined the Pasadena Communist Party at the same time as Frank Malina, who was similarly mistreated. ...Malina was just one of the thousands of wrongly accused Americans ensnared by the Red Scare of the early 1950s. The indictment against him was dismissed in 1954, and his passport was restored four years later. Without actual evidence to the contrary, it seems inappropriate to cast aspersions about Qian, especially if they are based on a stereotype or group association. |
SpaceAholic Member Posts: 4677 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 10-27-2020 04:52 PM
He had classified documents in his possession preceding his arrest and detention. The absence of evidence in the public domain doesn't mean it isn't retained within Intelligence and LE investigative repositories. Often times sensitive sources and methods are utilized to gather that evidence which precludes its release. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 44918 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 10-27-2020 05:13 PM
According to The Milwaukee Journal in 1955 ("US Deporting Rocket Expert"): Federal agents seized eight packing cases which Dr. Tsien was shipping to himself in Shanghai. The government later said there was no secret material in the boxes. That aside, it was not like Qian was cribbing off others; it was his own original work that he was allegedly "spying" on for China. As evident by what he did once he returned home, he was more than capable of making advances on his own. China did not need him to be a spy given his own intellect and skill. |
dom Member Posts: 904 From: Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted 10-27-2020 05:28 PM
Why would a privileged aristocrat in his dream academic job (so good he was in the process of applying for US citizenship) have spied for people he probably looked down on? His wife was even the daughter of Chinese nationalists (their arch enemies) and he seriously thought he was going to be locked up when he returned. Sending Tsien back to China was one of the biggest "own goals" of the Cold War and gave it the ability to create missiles years before it should have naturally happened. |
David C Member Posts: 1176 From: Lausanne Registered: Apr 2012
|
posted 10-28-2020 03:13 AM
quote: Originally posted by SpaceAholic: There is a long record of Chinese nationals engaging in economic, industrial and national security espionage...
Whether you choose to admit it or not, that's both a paranoid and racist assumption. There's also a history of white Americans selling secrets. Remember Hanssen, Pitts, Ames, Boone, Pelton etc? Let's just say that unbiased and constant vigilance is required by the security agencies. quote: He had classified documents in his possession...
Sort of, his own work. This is classic security service "heavy" mentality. They may as well accept that his own brain was classified and stop hassling him.The classic excuse of last resort: something else may not be in the public domain so let's just trust them. No, we know enough about their behaviour to know they can't be trusted. Anyway, lets keep the discussion to what can be discussed, because equally, there may be something still classified and extremely embarrassing to the government. quote: If Xuesen had altruistic intentions he could have gone elsewhere and/or applied his talents towards peaceful purposes.
Why did his intentions have to be any more altruistic than those of any American scientist or engineer? It seems that he was considered disloyal for not wanting to create weapons to attack his homeland (remember he wasn't a US citizen). However, it's expected that we kick you in the teeth but you are not allowed to feel any resentment, nor be allowed to continue what you see as your life's work after ignorant morons try to destroy it, nor return to the land of your birth. Just do what we want like a good lap dog. Really? Would you have? I wouldn't.Now everyone's entitled to their opinion, but I can't see that the long term outcome of this episode's handling was good for the USA. Perhaps something more can be learnt from it than simply thinking that everything was done right. |
SpaceAholic Member Posts: 4677 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 10-28-2020 08:21 AM
Counter intelligence/counter-espionage activities are inherently proactive pursuits triggered by flags. His conduct and the general circumstances surrounding Qian's life, employment, affiliations, access to highly sensitive materials complied with a pattern that raised the index of suspicion and served as a predicate for surveilling and ultimately detaining Qian. This was at a time when the US had been burned by a number of other high level spying incidents (remember the Rosenbergs?). The materials in his possession when classified become government property and subject to national security restrictions for storage, handling, protection (regardless of who produced them). Qian violated his agreement to abide by those policies. Misappropriation of the term "racism" seems to be in vogue today as an attempt to shut down legitimate discourse. Not going to work here. |
David C Member Posts: 1176 From: Lausanne Registered: Apr 2012
|
posted 10-28-2020 10:08 AM
Yeah, they're not really raised by "flags", so much as subjective interpretation of incomplete data. Part of that interpretation is governed by preconceptions. It's all shades of gray.As reported by newspapers at the time, the materials in his possession were not classified meaning he violated nothing. As for the Rosenbergs, I fail to see the connection. Their profile was completely different, and, as a couple, there is no doubt about their guilt of espionage. Claiming that the term "racism" is being used to to shut down discourse is a poor defence when the discussion is not being stopped. Was it racism that started the rumours about him? Quite possibly. Was it paranoia? Certainly. At root I think it was simply a lack of imagination that led to the impasse. He wasn't an American (he wasn't a citizen of the PRC either since it didn't exist when he emigrated). He had helped create the atomic bomb to end WWII, but the politicians and generals had other ideas. Like many other scientists, he didn't much like them. The government got unhappy when he refused to create weapons that could be used to attack his homeland. Put simply, they were fools for putting him in that position. It would have been one thing if he'd offered, quite another to try and force him. On top of that, recall that there were senior Americans advocating the first use of nuclear weapons. Hardly peace loving. So if he was altruistic — your word, and perhaps he was, perhaps he should have done exactly what he did. Go home, get a deterrent (if it's good enough for the USA and USSR, it's good enough for China), and stop hot heads in the USA wiping out his homeland. Now I'm not saying that was his original intention, but after America made him unwelcome, can't you see how that could easily follow? Think twice before you maltreat someone, and if you do, do the job properly. |
Cozmosis22 Member Posts: 1047 From: Texas * Earth Registered: Apr 2011
|
posted 10-28-2020 03:22 PM
quote: Originally posted by David C: I can't see that the long term outcome of this episode's handling was good for the USA.
The long term outcome was just fine for both countries. The US didn't really lose anything and it got rid of a potential security risk during the Korean War. American aerospace technological research continued unabated. And China acquired a western-trained scientist who helped them slowly elevate their status. |
David C Member Posts: 1176 From: Lausanne Registered: Apr 2012
|
posted 10-28-2020 03:38 PM
Well I'm thinking American research could have proceeded faster with him — if employed suitably. I don't recall the US having a massive lead back then, possibly the reverse, remember the space race? I'm also thinking that perhaps North Korea wouldn't continue to be the problem it is today without a technologically advanced and friendly China next door. Bearing in mind China’s attitude to North Korea over the last seven decades or so, and their behaviour elsewhere, I don’t share your sanguine assessment of China’s long term intentions. That's just for starters. Of course that's not all down to Xuesen by any means but still, I'm not so sure it's worked out just fine. |
Jim Behling Member Posts: 1545 From: Cape Canaveral, FL Registered: Mar 2010
|
posted 10-28-2020 10:47 PM
We weren't that far behind, if at all. We had recovered six reconsat capsules by the time of Shepard's flight. We had plenty of ICBMs (just didn't lift as much as other because our warheads were lighter). We could have launched a satellite earlier, but waited. We didn't do stunts, we had a plan progression of achievements. |
David C Member Posts: 1176 From: Lausanne Registered: Apr 2012
|
posted 10-29-2020 03:50 AM
I agree that, for want of a better way of putting it, we made ourselves look further behind than we really were in launching a satellite. However, in terms of putting a man in orbit, we were well and truly behind. Shepard's flight may have saved some face with the press, but objectively speaking, Gagarin's flight was in a completely different league. I don't think we should minimise how far behind the country felt, nor under how much pressure NASA found itself. And if you look at our "natural" rate of progress, i.e. unstimulated by the Soviets, when would the US have put a man in orbit? That's how far behind we really were. |