Author
|
Topic: Who was this (upset) payload specialist?
|
BobbyA Member Posts: 147 From: Northern Virginia Registered: Jul 2002
|
posted 11-17-2008 03:01 PM
I had heard a story of a payload specialist in the early days of shuttle program that had a failed experiment. The story goes that this failed experiment caused him to get really depressed, and caused the rest of the crew some concern. Does anyone know who this might have been and/or which mission? |
ilbasso Member Posts: 1522 From: Greensboro, NC USA Registered: Feb 2006
|
posted 11-17-2008 03:26 PM
There was an urban legend floating around that one person had become so depressed that the crew duct-taped the crew hatch so that he couldn't blow it in orbit. That was debunked. |
mjanovec Member Posts: 3811 From: Midwest, USA Registered: Jul 2005
|
posted 11-17-2008 05:02 PM
I suspect you saw the episode of The Universe that I saw last night on the History Channel.  Mike Mullane also discusses this incident in his book (Riding Rockets) but also holds back from telling us the name (since there is no need to embarrass the person in question... who probably now regrets his/her actions and statements from the time). Mullane's main argument was the program to fly payload specialists in the 80s was flawed, because many of the payload specialists didn't go through the same screening and training that the pilot astronauts and mission specialists went through (even while expressing respect for certain payload specialists like Charlie Walker, whom he flew with). He viewed the payload specialists as somewhat of an unknown factor for the missions... especially the ones picked to fly for political or PR reasons. If nothing else, one could argue that perhaps not all of the payload specialists were fully trained to appreciate the dangers and risks inherent to spaceflight... especially in an era when NASA was trying hard to make spaceflight appear to be safe-enough and routine-enough for the "average" person (such as a teacher or a congressman) to participate in. I don't recall a story of the hatch being duct-taped shut (nor could I envision how one could even do such a thing effectively), though it has been discussed elsewhere that duct tape is a tool available for restraining an astronaut who is out of control (especially around the time when the Nowak incident was in the news). There has been concern about finding ways to prevent the hatch from being opened by an upset crew member, including discussion of putting a lock on the hatch. Perhaps the stories have gotten blended somehow to become urban legend. |
KSCartist Member Posts: 2896 From: Titusville, FL USA Registered: Feb 2005
|
posted 11-17-2008 06:42 PM
It wasn't duct tape used to secure the hatch, it was padlocked by the commander. |
John Charles Member Posts: 339 From: Houston, Texas, USA Registered: Jun 2004
|
posted 11-17-2008 07:02 PM
In fact, the padlock incident was mentioned briefly during NASA TV's STS-126 pre-launch coverage. A former close-out crewmember (apologies, I didn't catch his name) peppered his description of the close-out crew activities then occurring with vignettes from his long career, such as the padlock story.Given subsequent events illustrating irrational behaviors among actual career astronauts, I wonder if Mike Mullane would still be concerned only about payload specialists. |
mjanovec Member Posts: 3811 From: Midwest, USA Registered: Jul 2005
|
posted 11-18-2008 08:59 AM
He wasn't so concerned about irrational behaviors among the PS's (though he did mention the incident described above) as he was about the different level of training the PS's went through. He felt it was wrong to expose these people to spaceflight without fully training them to understand and accept the risks and hazards of spaceflight. (Keep in mind this was a time when NASA wanted people to think spaceflight was becoming safe and routine.) |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 42988 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 11-18-2008 09:08 AM
Taylor Wang, provides his side of the story on pages 232 and 233 of Space Shuttle: The First 20 Years. An excerpt: So finally, in desperation, I said, "Hey, if you guys don't give me a chance to repair my instrument, I'm not coming back."Well, NASA got very nervous at that point. They actually got a psychologist to talk to the other crew members and ask, "Is Taylor going nuts?" Fortunately, my commander, Bob Overmyer, said, "No, he's okay. He's just depressed, and he really wants to repair the experiment. We'll help out." They were on my side. Finally NASA said okay... ...I was relieved, because I hadn't really figured out how not to come back if they'd called my bluff. The Asian tradition of honorable suicide, seppuku, would have failed, since everything on the shuttle is designed for safety. The knife on-board can't even cut the bread. You could put your head in the oven, but it's really just a food warmer. You wouldn't even burn yourself. And if you tried to hang yourself with no gravity, you'd just dangle there and look like an idiot. |
BobbyA Member Posts: 147 From: Northern Virginia Registered: Jul 2002
|
posted 11-18-2008 10:48 AM
quote: Originally posted by mjanovec: I suspect you saw the episode of The Universe that I saw last night on the History Channel.
Thanks for the input. I was in fact watching The Universe on the History Channel, but I had heard some of the story before as well. It seems that the story has been exaggerated at times. But if Wang talks about the Asian tradition of honorable suicide... well, that is kind of scary. |
SpaceAholic Member Posts: 4437 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 11-18-2008 11:01 AM
Wasn't it access to the Soyuz that was secured to prevent access to a firearm stowed on the spacecraft? |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 42988 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 11-18-2008 11:23 AM
Perhaps the firearm itself is restrained, but free access to the Soyuz has to be maintained in case of an emergency evacuation (you wouldn't want the incapacitation of whoever held the keys to be the reason why the crew was lost). Besides, payload specialists (of the traditional industry sense) stopped flying long before American astronauts were on Soyuz... |
kr4mula Member Posts: 642 From: Cinci, OH Registered: Mar 2006
|
posted 11-18-2008 02:07 PM
Was this instance perhaps separate from the padlock one? Brewster Shaw claims to be the commander that used it, with Rudolpho Neri Vela as the PS in question. I don't hesistate to use the names since Shaw goes on to say Neri Vela turned out great.From Shaw's JSC oral history: SHAW: Anyhow, that was a fun flight. We also had Rodolfo Neri Vela on that flight. This was really the first -- I don't remember if it was the first time we flew somebody like that or not, to tell you the truth. The first time I had flown with somebody that we didn't know very well. You know, Ulf Merbold was a German, but he'd been training with those guys a long time. They knew him well. We didn't know Rodolfo very well. He kind of showed up late in the process and wasn't here all the time and stuff, and so you didn't really get to know him well. So I wasn't too sure about his human reliability. I'm probably a paranoid kind of guy, but I didn't know what he was going to do on orbit.So I remember I got this padlock, and when we got on orbit, I went down to the hatch on the side of the Orbiter, and I padlocked the hatch control so that you could not open the hatch. I mean, on the Orbiter on orbit you can go down there and you just flip this little thing and you crank that handle once [demonstrates], the hatch opens and all the air goes out and everybody goes out with it, just like that. And I thought to myself, "Jeez, I don't know this guy very well. He might flip out or something." So I padlocked the hatch shut right after we got on orbit, and I didn't take the padlock off until we were in de-orbit prep. I don't know if I was supposed to do that or not, but that's a decision I made as being responsible for my crew and I just did it. RUSNAK: Did any of the rest of the crew notice it? SHAW: Yes. I don't think Rodolfo noticed it, but some of the other crew noticed it. But everything went just fine. He turned out to be a great guy, and we had a lot of fun on that mission. That was a very successful mission, as were all three of the times I got to fly. In fact, we have not really had an unsuccessful Space Shuttle mission except for Challenger. |
Greggy_D Member Posts: 977 From: Michigan Registered: Jul 2006
|
posted 11-18-2008 06:54 PM
If I recall correctly, Shaw heard about Overmyer's 51-B events and requested the padlock for 61-B.In my opinion, Wang's account listed above still sounds absolutely nutty. |
Jay Chladek Member Posts: 2272 From: Bellevue, NE, USA Registered: Aug 2007
|
posted 11-19-2008 10:13 AM
I wouldn't make too much of Taylor's reaction as I think he was kidding about trying to off himself. It sounds pretty humorous actually.  More then likely it is one of those deals where when things were done to get a person into orbit, they want to do a good job up there because it is their reason for being up there. Some take it more seriously then others and cultural background can enter into it as well. As such if your piece of equipment breaks on the first day and it is your only experiment and given that you are just as goal oriented as the MSes, you would probably want to get permission to fix it as well rather then sit back, twiddle your thumbs and watch the world go by. |
ilbasso Member Posts: 1522 From: Greensboro, NC USA Registered: Feb 2006
|
posted 11-28-2008 06:40 PM
Was very interested to read this quote from Alan Bean's Skylab diary in "Homesteading Space" (p. 297): Sometimes, like on a tall building, get a controllable urge similar to jumping off which is to open a hatch to vacuum - or to take off a glove or pop a helmet - fortunately, these are passing impulses that you can control but it is interesting to know they take place. Isn't it interesting that even one of the most terminally upbeat of all astronauts would get these urges on occasion? |
Peter downunder Member Posts: 57 From: Lancefield, Victoria, Australia Registered: Apr 2012
|
posted 09-12-2013 05:55 AM
Isn't it one of those things everyone experiences when looking over the 'edge'? I've seen questions addressing that phenomena, but I've never dared to answer it honestly. In fact, I don't think I'd admit it to anyone... hang on. |
garymilgrom Member Posts: 1966 From: Atlanta, GA Registered: Feb 2007
|
posted 09-12-2013 02:13 PM
I don't think Bean was talking about a suicidal impulse. I think it was more curiosity than anything else, along the lines of "I wonder what would happen if...." even when you (he) know the outcome would be threatening or disastrous. |
SkyMan1958 Member Posts: 867 From: CA. Registered: Jan 2011
|
posted 09-12-2013 05:32 PM
+1I suspect that most people that have been at the edge of something tall have wondered what it would be like to jump, not to kill oneself, just that oddball feeling. |
YankeeClipper Member Posts: 617 From: Dublin, Ireland Registered: Mar 2011
|
posted 09-15-2013 04:16 AM
Reminds me of September 1998 when I found myself inverted in the dark at 9pm on a Saturday night below the Leukerbad Gemmi Bahn cablecar in Switzerland - a 1,000ft BASE-Bungee jump.It had been preceded earlier that day with a jump off the Pont de l'Araignée (Spider Bridge) at Niouc (623ft) and followed up on the Sunday with a jump off the Verzasca "007 Goldeneye" Dam Wall (722ft). It is definitely a strange experience stepping off into a void like that from an edge. You don't really jump as the weight of the cord wants to pull you off and once the safety line is disarmed, your grip on a handrail is the last remaining brake on the jump. The initial sensation is of nothing really - just unrestrained freefall. After a few seconds wind rush builds in your ears and you become acutely aware of the ground rush sensation. Best bit is when you out-bounce back up to neutral gravity and are floating in the air for a few milliseconds before getting to repeat the sensations except this time you know exactly what is coming!  |
Peter downunder Member Posts: 57 From: Lancefield, Victoria, Australia Registered: Apr 2012
|
posted 09-19-2013 02:11 AM
I've taken a number of psych evaluations for different jobs over the years. They always seem to have a question about jumping from buildings. And I've always lied. I wonder if those checking the answer know... |
MCroft04 Member Posts: 1634 From: Smithfield, Me, USA Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted 10-25-2014 06:12 PM
I understand why padlocks would have been carried on missions after the first time a hatch was locked. But why would there have been a padlock on board the first time? Are padlocks normally carried on the orbiter? |
webhamster Member Posts: 106 From: Ottawa, Canada Registered: Jul 2008
|
posted 10-31-2014 09:14 AM
I seem to remember a statement by Brewster Shaw somewhere (maybe it was later in the cited interview from earlier) that he just went down to a hardware store before launch and bought an off-the-shelf padlock. |
p51 Member Posts: 1642 From: Olympia, WA Registered: Sep 2011
|
posted 10-31-2014 11:06 AM
quote: Originally posted by ilbasso: Isn't it interesting that even one of the most terminally upbeat of all astronauts would get these urges on occasion?
It's been addressed before, but people like astronauts usually think ahead all the time at what might happen if... I saw it often myself in the military. Once I was prepping some ordnance, things that would kill you so badly that they'd be able to fit your remains in a small baggie. I, too, was thinking about what'd happen if someone pulled or pushed the wrong thing and what sized crater that would leave as well as how little of me would be found later. Not long afterward, one of my Sergeants made a comment like that, then worried we were thinking he was going to blow us up. All of us laughed and said we'd each been thinking the same thing. In the few parachute jumps I did, I liked to dive head first if I could, as I'd be just as dead if something went wrong regardless of how I exited the aircraft and I wanted to look 'cool' as I did so. |
MCroft04 Member Posts: 1634 From: Smithfield, Me, USA Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted 10-31-2014 02:33 PM
quote: Originally posted by webhamster: I seem to remember a statement by Brewster Shaw somewhere (maybe it was later in the cited interview from earlier) that he just went down to a hardware store before launch and bought an off-the-shelf padlock.
But what about the first incident? Brewster's mission was not the first time the hatch was allegedly locked. If a lock was used to secure the hatch, where would it have come from? No hardware stores up there. Possibly it was secured with duct tape? |
Greggy_D Member Posts: 977 From: Michigan Registered: Jul 2006
|
posted 11-01-2014 06:59 PM
Here's some more information in this cS thread.Last year, I talked with Mary Cleave about the 51B incident and I categorized it as an "urban legend." She replied, "That was no urban legend. It happened." I then showed her the 61B Entry Checklist FDF and turned to the page which listed a "locking device." She confirmed the "locking device" was the combination padlock. |