Author
|
Topic: The "Carpenter Grunt"??
|
Duke Of URL Member Posts: 1316 From: Syracuse, NY Registered: Jan 2005
|
posted 02-07-2006 06:21 PM
I saw some damn thing some damn place about centrifuge training. The individuals involved were breathing in an explosive manner. (Actually, I think the show was about Flying Saucers of all things)Now I read something about a breathing technique Dynamically Pioneered by the father of a certain poster here. (I'm not using any names because I don't want to involve her mother, a woman named "Rene".) So, my question is, did a certain poster's Old Man contribute a method for breathing under heavy g-loads? Is the technique in use today? And is it known as the "Carpenter Grunt"? |
KC Stoever Member Posts: 1012 From: Denver, CO USA Registered: Oct 2002
|
posted 02-08-2006 01:54 PM
Yeah. In interviews for his book, Carpenter recalled that the centrifuge training at the USN's Johnsville facility called for very high-g runs. His "explosive" grunting technique, called the Carpenter grunt by astronaut physician Bill Douglas, helped him improve his own performance. It was adopted by others, I believe, with similar gains in performance at the time (ca. 1959).Makes sense to use the power of the diaphragm to counteract g forces. I don't know what, if any, effect the Carpenter grunt had on repelling any alien invasions or flying saucers, though. And I don't know if the technique is still in use today. [This message has been edited by KC Stoever (edited February 08, 2006).] |
Duke Of URL Member Posts: 1316 From: Syracuse, NY Registered: Jan 2005
|
posted 02-08-2006 02:32 PM
Not only a Dynamic Pioneer of Sea & Space - but also of BREATHING TECHNIQUES!Maybe some of the Astronauts who read this forum - in camera, of course - could say if the CG is still in use? Any Flying Saucer inhabitants should feel free to put in their two stroonks worth. |
Schuh New Member Posts: 6 From: Registered: May 2005
|
posted 02-10-2006 04:00 PM
To Kris:Just picked up "For Spacious Skies," as I systematically work my way through every M-G-A astro biography out there. Just got up to where you were born! I must say it's an EXTREMELY enjoyable read. And a great pleasure to actually have (one of) the author(s) right here on board with us. Regards, Tom Schuh Buffalo, NY USA |
FFrench Member Posts: 3161 From: San Diego Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 02-10-2006 04:18 PM
quote: Originally posted by Duke Of URL: Maybe some of the Astronauts who read this forum - in camera, of course - could say if the CG is still in use?
Do you mean in training or on spaceflights? If I recall correctly (and someone else please chime in), they haven't used centrifuges in training for a long, long time. |
KC Stoever Member Posts: 1012 From: Denver, CO USA Registered: Oct 2002
|
posted 02-10-2006 06:23 PM
To Tom,Wow! Thanks for the hugely appreciated words. Kris |
Duke Of URL Member Posts: 1316 From: Syracuse, NY Registered: Jan 2005
|
posted 02-10-2006 07:03 PM
I apologize for not knowing centrifuge training wasn't used. I just saw some guys (and a member of the female persuasion) doing runs and thought of the technique Kris' Old Man dynamically pioneered.Did the other Mercury/Gemini/Apollo astronauts use the CG? It reminds me of the technique I use to slow down a tachycardia episode. The show was the usual Flying Saucer flapdoodle. The idea was that, given the enormous speeds and abrupt manouvers - 90 degree turns etc - any occupants of Flying Saucers would be turned into little bitty Alien meat balls without some sort of anti-gravity device. I scoffed. Having ridden in a car driven through Paris by an Italian woman I can tell people all you really need to survive is 3 litres of vin ordinaire. And we have that stuff on THIS planet. It was nice to see the usual coconuts from the Flying Saucer Community turning a buck, though. I love that guy with the funky beard! [This message has been edited by Duke Of URL (edited February 10, 2006).] |
FFrench Member Posts: 3161 From: San Diego Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 02-10-2006 07:25 PM
quote: Originally posted by Duke Of URL: I apologize for not knowing centrifuge training wasn't used.
I may be wrong... looking forward to someone who knows for sure to chime in. |
Duke Of URL Member Posts: 1316 From: Syracuse, NY Registered: Jan 2005
|
posted 02-11-2006 03:01 AM
quote: Originally posted by FFrench: I may be wrong... looking forward to someone who knows for sure to chime in.
I'm sorry, but if you limit posts to people who actually know what they're talking about we're going to lose a lot of people. |
lewarren Member Posts: 269 From: Houston, TX, USA Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted 02-11-2006 11:58 AM
Any pilot of a high performance aircraft is familiar with the anti-G straining maneuver. It has probably been around as long as airplanes have been around.The straining maneuver – nicknamed “M-1" or "L-1” – consists of clenching all the body’s major muscles, most importantly the legs and abdominals, and ballistic breathing. The latter involves quickly sucking in air, holding the breath for a few seconds, grunting, explosively exhaling and gasping in another breath, which is repeated until G’s are “offloaded.” The pilots breathing sounds like a powerlifter trying to bench press a hippopotamus. Fortunately, G suits were developed to prevent blood pooling in the lower extremities. This suit is a pair of pants with inflatable air bladders over the large muscle groups. When an aircraft is put into a high-G maneuver, the G-suit inflates and forces blood back into the upper body. Interestingly, the US Navy Blue Angels (and perhaps the USAF Thunderbirds) do not use G suits, so the pilots rely purely on M-1 maneuvers to maintain conciousness. If you ever get a chance to see cockpit video of a performance, listen for the grunting! |
KC Stoever Member Posts: 1012 From: Denver, CO USA Registered: Oct 2002
|
posted 02-12-2006 02:16 PM
OK. That was interesting--and raised some additional questions in my mind, which I ran past the Old Man.Carpenter was not familiar with the M-1 term, but when asked about the "grunting," he independently referred to the use of muscles one would use in a "dead lift." The grunting is "an artifact," he says, of the occasional inhaling one is required to do during a high-g exercise. The grunting precedes inhaling. Some other items of interest. --The high-g runs at Johnsville were typically run in the G sub z mode (supine), pioneered by the Navy. --Astronauts and others training for Atlas abort profiles (aborts produced very high-g reentries, for which astronauts would therefore need to train) did not use pressure suits or G suits when on the centrifuge. --Further, centrifuge runs are measured in two ways, Carpenter reminded me, by rate of acceleration and duration. Carter Collins set the record in 1958 (something like 20 gs--I do not know the duration). NASA researchers found that some football players sustain as many as 40 gs in being tackled, for example, but this assault on the body lasts for only a fraction of a second. So sustainable gs are a function of rate of acceleration AND duration. (Thank you, Dad.) When asked, he said he remembers reading that the Blue Angels reach up to 9 gs for "short periods." Carpenter recalled in addition one Johnsville experiment that called for a 24-hour (duration) 2 g (rate of acceleration) run on the centrifuge. Researchers thought it best to start with chimps. The chimp died a couple of hours into the experiment. Anyone can do 2 gs. But duration is another matter. Carpenter set the Project Mercury record, he recalled today, sustaining 16 gs for five seconds--no g suit, in a G sub z mode. In FOR SPACIOUS SKIES (I just checked), it says Carpenter went up to 18 gs. But there's no mention of duration. So as far as memory served today, 16 gs at 5 seconds was the Johnsville record set during Project Mercury. It was held by Carpenter. [This message has been edited by KC Stoever (edited February 12, 2006).] |
Duke Of URL Member Posts: 1316 From: Syracuse, NY Registered: Jan 2005
|
posted 02-12-2006 06:50 PM
quote: Originally posted by KC Stoever: [B]So as far as memory served today, 16 gs at 5 seconds was the Johnsville record set during Project Mercury. It was held by Carpenter. B]
There is another measure: frequency. A human being whacked on top of his head by a wife's shoe is only subject to 2 Gs, which is easily survivable, and the actual duration is quite short. However, when this 2G force is applied rapidly over the course of, say, ten seconds the damage can mount up. Especially since you're experiencing high-frequency periods of "eyeballs in/eyeballs out" stress(your eyeballs barely get back in before they pop out again) and 110 plus decibel sonic loads. [This message has been edited by Duke Of URL (edited February 12, 2006).] |
H E Pennypacker Member Posts: 53 From: Sydney, NSW, Australia Registered: Dec 2004
|
posted 02-12-2006 07:00 PM
quote: However, when this 2G force is applied rapidly over the course of, say, ten seconds the damage can mount up.
We've noticed.... [This message has been edited by H E Pennypacker (edited February 12, 2006).] |
KC Stoever Member Posts: 1012 From: Denver, CO USA Registered: Oct 2002
|
posted 02-12-2006 10:37 PM
quote: Originally posted by Duke Of URL: There is another measure: frequency. A human being whacked on top of his head by a wife's shoe is only subject to 2 Gs, which is easily survivable, and the actual duration is quite short.
Dad, is that you? |