Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Auctions - Reviews & Results
  [Julien's] Legends & Explorers (July 2020)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   [Julien's] Legends & Explorers (July 2020)
SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4580
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 06-29-2020 02:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The "2001: A Space Odyssey" spacesuit believed to have been worn by Dr. David Bowman when he "killed" HAL in the groundbreaking 1968 film is going on the auction block.
The highlight of a Hollywood and space exploration memorabilia show that's set for July 17-18 in Beverly Hills, the spacesuit is conservatively estimated to fetch between $200,000 and 300,000.

It's a rare artifact from the classic by filmmaker Stanley Kubrick, who is thought to have destroyed most of the props and wardrobe from "2001" — widely regarded as one of most influential films of all time — to prevent their use in other productions without his authorization.

Among the more than 900 items going up for auction at the same event are the pilot control stick Neil Armstrong used on the Apollo 11 flight to the moon -- estimated to go for $100,000 to $200,000 -- and an Apollo-era spacesuit glove designed for Armstrong, estimated at $10,000 to $20,000.

thisismills
Member

Posts: 331
From: Michigan
Registered: Mar 2012

posted 06-29-2020 03:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for thisismills   Click Here to Email thisismills     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The space lots start at 794.

The 2001 suit is lot 897. Several high-profile flown Apollo items are also included in this sale.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 44346
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 06-29-2020 03:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Lots 794, 795 and 796, the Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins controllers were previously pulled from other auctions after NASA inquired about their provenance. Julien's lot descriptions include the following:
The provenance of this item has been corroborated by an official NASA audit report published by the Office of Inspector General in 2018.
That OIG report states:
...three command module hand controllers that steered the Apollo 11 spacecraft were appropriately removed, labeled as NASA property, and stored in an office safe at Johnson Space Center (Johnson). According to the former NASA employee who managed the safe, prior to his retirement in 1985 he asked his supervisor what to do with the controllers and was told to throw them out; however, he instead took the three controllers home. Years later, the former employee sold the controllers at auction to a collector of space memorabilia.

When NASA learned of the sale, it sought return of the controllers to replace the mockup controllers that were on display at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. (Officials at Johnson, the original user of this property, expressed no interest in reclaiming the controllers; however, Headquarters officials pressed for return of the items.)

After 3 years, NASA discontinued its pursuit of the items.

Apart from pursuing legal action to recover an artifact, NASA can also ask the current owner to voluntarily return the property to NASA or request the artifact be donated to a museum with a provision that the individual or family be mentioned in the display or provided other compensation. NASA has experienced limited success recovering property via these options.

During its attempts to retrieve the three Apollo 11 controllers, the OIG became aware that the former employee had also retained a command module translation handle from the Apollo 9 spacecraft that was used to steer and provide abort capabilities. The former employee voluntarily returned the handle, after which NASA transferred it to the Smithsonian to be included in an existing display.

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4580
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 06-29-2020 03:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The report didnt relinquish government claim so replevin remains a significant risk.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 44346
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 07-18-2020 05:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
collectSPACE
Apollo 11 spacecraft joysticks top $780K at auction, despite NASA concerns

Three joysticks used to fly the historic spacecraft that carried the first astronauts to land on the moon have sold for more than $780,000 — despite NASA having sought their return.

Two rotational attitude control sticks and a translation hand controller from the Apollo 11 command module, Columbia, were offered by Julien's Auctions of Beverly Hills on Saturday (July 18), 51 years after the first lunar landing mission. The artifacts were among a small collection of NASA memorabilia included in Julien's Hollywood: Legends and Explorers sale, which also featured a nearly complete spacesuit worn in Stanley Kubrick's 1968 film, "2001: A Space Odyssey."

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 44346
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 07-18-2020 08:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The "2001" spacesuit costume sold for the same $370,000 as the translation hand controller that installed next to Neil Armstrong's couch.

I would not call either a steal, but both sold for less than I would have called a fair price. It is difficult to say for sure if the legal status of the hand controllers had an effect on their sale price, but if it did, it is an understandable reason.

David C
Member

Posts: 1122
From: Lausanne
Registered: Apr 2012

posted 07-19-2020 09:04 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for David C     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I haven't read the audit report (yet), and I don't know all the legal ins and outs, but this is my layman's gut reaction. NASA staff have been unbelievably careless, verging on criminally negligent with historical engineering items paid for by the U.S. taxpayer. In particular the conduct of both Whipkey's supervisor, and Whipkey himself is morally reprehensible — if the story related is the truth. When the Apollo 11 crew members declined those gifts, why did they think they did that? For sure it wasn't so the CM hand controllers could wind up in the trash, or be privately auctioned off.

That either NASA employee in this tale considers his conduct in any way met professional standards, I find incredible.

"Hey Boss, what should I do with this priceless historic relic?"

"Just chuck it in the trash man."

Thinks: "That's a darned logical and reasonable reply, and gosh, I won't do it because it's a priceless historic relic. I'll just take it as permission to keep it for myself instead. I certainly won't check with anyone else. I've got the answer I wanted to hear."

As a minimum, they should both have their pensions decremented. Unbelievable conduct. Personally, I cannot see how that is not theft of government property, plain and simple. But as I said, I'm a layman and I don't understand the legal ins and outs.

drifting to the right
Member

Posts: 122
From: SW La.
Registered: Aug 2006

posted 07-19-2020 02:06 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for drifting to the right     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
That could be seen by some to be a "one sided, unverified, anonymous anecdote."

David C
Member

Posts: 1122
From: Lausanne
Registered: Apr 2012

posted 07-19-2020 02:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for David C     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ha. Good one. Wouldn't want that. Just to be clear, it's entirely my made up unverified version.

hbw60
Member

Posts: 83
From:
Registered: Aug 2018

posted 07-19-2020 02:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for hbw60   Click Here to Email hbw60     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I agree with David 100%. The Apollo 11 crew understood the significance of the mission, and generously refused to keep some of the major mementos from it. In particular, I think it was very noble of them to not take the patches/insignias from their suits, when it was traditional for the astronauts to keep them. If Neil Armstrong had kept (and subsequently sold) the patches from his suit, they would have fetched millions of dollars at auction. I can't imagine a more historically significant or valuable memento. But instead, Neil allowed the patches to remain on the suit, to ensure that they'd be available on display at the Smithsonian. It's an intensely decent thing to have done. Beyond their monetary value, I'm sure Neil would have loved having those patches as the centerpiece of his collection.

And these hand controllers fall into the same category. When the astronauts refused to take them, it wasn't because they were unwanted. It was because they were too precious to put into a private collection. They never should have become the personal property of a NASA employee to begin with. And they certainly shouldn't have been sold off for profit. The astronauts intended them to be a gift to the nation, not a gift to a wealthy businessman to show off at dinner parties.

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4580
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 07-19-2020 03:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Either way and ultimately (via replevin or the generosity of current or future owner(s)) I believe we will see these items reunited with Columbia.

David C
Member

Posts: 1122
From: Lausanne
Registered: Apr 2012

posted 07-19-2020 04:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for David C     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I sure hope so, but honestly I really feel that some sort of punitive sanction is warranted, if only for future deterrence value. Quite aside from how much tax payer's money has rightly been expended on the recovery effort.

Larry McGlynn
Member

Posts: 1286
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Jul 2003

posted 07-19-2020 05:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Larry McGlynn   Click Here to Email Larry McGlynn     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I agree with Scott. Uncle Sam is a very patient man. Those pieces will be returned to the US Government sometime in the future. The law is on their side. It will just depend on how far the DOJ and the OIG will go to get them back.

As for Bill Whipkey, he was a nice guy who helped the astronauts with their splashdown presentations. Still, he has used the "Dumpster Defense" and that does not and never did work in these cases. Bill passed away a few years ago, but I learned a lot from him about the work he did in the Special Services Directorate at JSC during my conversations with him. His boss has passed too.

But in 1975, NASA was mandated by the USG to clear out all the warehouses filled with Apollo inventory and get prepared for Shuttle. That is when everything was either given to museums (who didn't have much storage space either), gone to the GSA for scrap and auction (ie Nortons), or just thrown away.

It is buyer beware on GI material that does not have the GSA paperwork on big-ticket items that make a splash in the auction world.

That goes double for military collectors of Civil War, WW1 and WW2 issued collectibles. The Navy's replevin of objects salvaged from the USS Murphy's lost bow is a good case in point. I knew most of the NJ divers involved in the finding and salvaging of the wreckage.

It can be very confusing and frustrating as a collector.

David C
Member

Posts: 1122
From: Lausanne
Registered: Apr 2012

posted 07-20-2020 07:25 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for David C     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Excellent post Larry.

MadSci
Member

Posts: 236
From: Maryland, USA
Registered: Oct 2008

posted 07-23-2020 02:42 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for MadSci     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Larry McGlynn:
It will just depend on how far the DOJ and the OIG will go to get them back.
All true Larry, however I think the law is truly unjust. When the official in apparent charge tells you to throw stuff out (like almost everything else in the program), and you save it instead, you have done the country, and the world, a service.

Personally I think the government should have the first right of refusal after a sale is pending. If NASA was too foolish and lax to let a precious artifact be thrown out, then Uncle Sam should have to pay the present owner its value to get it back years later when finally someone realizes what it's worth.

In the meantime, Caveat Collector!

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4580
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 07-23-2020 07:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
There remains the prospect that an official directing Whipkey to "throw the stuff out" — if that represents Whipkey's testimony, was 1) factually inaccurate, 2) constituted a unlawful order by a senior government employee without authority to disposition the property for disposal and/or 3) Whipkey either intentionally or errantly misinterpreted his leaderships guidance to "dispose" of the items as throw them out vs leverage mandated government deassession/disposal processes in place at the time.

Larry McGlynn
Member

Posts: 1286
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Jul 2003

posted 07-23-2020 05:40 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Larry McGlynn   Click Here to Email Larry McGlynn     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by MadSci:
In the meantime, Caveat Collector!
Collector beware is correct. The knowledgeable collector should learn what the laws of ownership are as pertains to their particular collecting habits.

In the case of Government Issued (GI) equipment, there are many laws related to ownership, sovereignty, disposal, or sale of any taxpayer-owned property. They center around the General Services Administration (GSA). The GSA was created in 1949 to combine several federal agencies that handled government-funded property, archive storage and, until FEMA was created, strategic supplies like medical supplies and equipment. The agency was formed so that there would be streamlined processes for the disposal of surplus war equipment allowing money to flow back to the US Treasury after an authorized sale. The GSA has many sales or auctions each year to sell off surplus or obsolete property.

So now that collectors, courtesy of the Apollo astronauts, know the laws that pertain to collecting flown space artifacts from the Apollo era they should avoid buying equipment unless it has transfer documentation from the USG or sold by an Apollo era astronaut. Remember only Congress has the right to give Gov Issued material away. Which Congress did when they passed HR4158 (the Astronaut Bill) in 2012.

This really isn't NASA's job anyway. NASA signed a memorandum of agreement with the Smithsonian in 1967 to give them the first right of refusal. NASM should notify the OIG to get the items back.

In other words, I would not touch them with a 15-foot pole.

space1
Member

Posts: 875
From: Danville, Ohio
Registered: Dec 2002

posted 07-29-2020 10:40 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for space1   Click Here to Email space1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Larry McGlynn:
...they should avoid buying equipment unless it has transfer documentation from the USG or sold by an Apollo era astronaut.
I should note that some equipment has been released through sales by government contractors (at the request of the government). I am aware of a number of items sold this way in years past, including flown items. The ILC "garage sales" also come to mind.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement