Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Auctions - Reviews & Results
  [RegencySuperior] Space Auction (Sept 2016)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   [RegencySuperior] Space Auction (Sept 2016)
Penney Kols
Member

Posts: 38
From: saint louis mo usa
Registered: Sep 2008

posted 08-22-2016 04:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Penney Kols     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
RegencySuperior proudly presents its Space & Collectibles Public Auction on Thursday, Sept. 29, 2016 beginning at 11 a.m. (Central Time). More than 350 lots will go up on the auction block with live internet bidding directly on RegencySuperior's website RegencySuperior.com and at Invaluable.com.

This auction features the continuation of the incredible collection of Richard Stonely, space collector and autograph aficionado. Space art, memorabilia and of course, astronaut autographs are all part of the unrivaled collection from the man who not only was lucky enough to meet these brave pioneers, but forged friendships over the years with his heroes. Below are just a few items from the collection of Richard Stonely and other space collectors.

Starting with a truly distinctive item, a primarily nickel meteorite measuring roughly 6"x6"x6, weighing nearly 12 lbs attributed to Great Meteor Crater (Barringer) and surrounding Canyon Diablo. This particular specimen (likely museum quality) was once owned by Thomas Beard, a professional consulting geologist. A gorgeous item that you have to see to believe.

If Project Mercury is more your passion, there are nearly a dozen photos, first day covers and other items to choose from. Lot 37 is a color photo depicting the Mercury 7 group in flight gear standing in front of US Air Force jet. Photo bears bold signatures of Scott Carpenter, Gordon Cooper, John Glenn, Gus Grissom, Wally Schirra, Alan Shepard and Deke Slayton. A must have for any Mercury 7 or general Space enthusiast.

A highlight from the Apollo program is an official NASA KSC PAO Apollo A7L Spacesuit model mock-up (Lot 84). The suit features include blue helmet collar, NASA patch, American flag patch, connectors, checklist pockets, zipper pocket on chest, detachable utility and checklist pockets on legs, penlight pocket on left arm, two hoses and blue and red flanges. Suit was used for educational purposes, Space center lobby displays and KSC Spaceport USA. It makes for an incredible display at a Museum or other institution.

Lot 278 is a baseball signed and inscribed (to Richard) by Neil Armstrong. This piece is signed in blue ink on the side panel. Has minimal toning and is incredibly desirable.

The showstopper of Richard's collection has to be a dazzling signed original painting titled 'Cosmic Journey', an original painting (36½"x55", framed to 43½"x62") by Apollo astronaut Alan Bean (Lot 304). Before he began painting, Bean prepared his board with a special texturing compound that he created, containing, in part, dust from the charred heat shield and gold foil, from the Command Module of Apollo 12. Once the texturing compound began to dry, he worked it with his hammer and sharp edged bit from his double core tube (both flown) and an exact replica of his moon boots to achieve a rough and irregular painting surface. A commissioned piece by Bean this large would cost over $400,000. This item is a true bargain with bidding opening at $10,000.

The entire auction is now available online for viewing and bidding at RegencySuperior.com. Free color catalogs are available by calling toll-free 1-800-782-0066.

For specific questions regarding this space auction, please contact Alan Lipkin. Good luck with your bidding!

JasonIUP
Member

Posts: 282
From: PA
Registered: Apr 2004

posted 08-23-2016 11:04 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for JasonIUP   Click Here to Email JasonIUP     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Richard sure got fooled on lots 120 to 122, two Apollo 11 crew-signed photos and a Neil Armstrong signed photo board!

moonnut
Member

Posts: 248
From: Andover, MN
Registered: Apr 2013

posted 08-23-2016 06:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for moonnut   Click Here to Email moonnut     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
You're right on that Jason. One description said the pen they all used was running out of ink. Might have been the same person signing all three, lol. Also:
  • Lot 134 - Lovell and Swigert
  • Lots 135 and 145 - Don't like the Lovells
  • Lot 163 - All autopens
Just my thoughts. A lot of the lots have excessive amounts of duplicates.

Bob M
Member

Posts: 1746
From: Atlanta-area, GA USA
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 08-24-2016 08:01 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Bob M   Click Here to Email Bob M     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
After the somewhat flawed first Richard Stonely/Regency auction, many of us were looking forward to the second one, expecting it to have more special and quality material that Richard amassed over decades of collecting and accumulating.

Typically, he was more interested in quantity than quality and his many astronaut signed covers bear this out, as the majority are of poorer quality/type than a more dedicated collector would select, with many being Secondary Recovery Ship covers rather than the more popular Prime Recovery Ship covers. I suspect that many of his astronaut autographed covers were acquired through years of Superior and Regency-Superior auctions, with many selling for lower amounts because of many collectors wanting better quality material.

A number of his failures have been listed already and a careful screening of his second Regency auction will uncover more. I have spent some time going through the auction and will later list some lots I have concern about.

Of course, there is plenty of quality material, such as several Alan Bean art prints and several Michael Collins original paintings. Also two crew signed covers of special note are lots 97 (Apollo 7 crew) and 162 (Apollo 16 crew).

But now after two auctions, why hasn't more of his more spectacular material been listed? For example, when will his NASA Apollo patch litho be listed that is authentically signed by every flown MGA astronaut but three (Grissom, White and Anders), and his stash of at least 6-8 very desirable GT-8 (Armstrong/Scott) crew signed covers? And for someone believed to have several hundred Armstrong autographs - many obtained in person - not a lot have been seen.

This auction was heavy on autographed covers but Richard specialized in autographed NASA photos/lithos, which would have more collector interest.

mjanovec
Member

Posts: 3811
From: Midwest, USA
Registered: Jul 2005

posted 08-25-2016 05:09 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for mjanovec   Click Here to Email mjanovec     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by JasonIUP:
Richard sure got fooled on lots 120 to 122, two Apollo 11 crew-signed photos and a Neil Armstrong signed photo board!

Regency seems to have been fooled too.

But then again, I see no evidence that Regency employs any authenticators whatsoever on their space auctions. As usual, buyer beware.

spaceflori
Member

Posts: 1499
From: Germany
Registered: May 2000

posted 08-26-2016 12:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for spaceflori   Click Here to Email spaceflori     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by JasonIUP:
Richard sure got fooled on lots 120 to 122, two Apollo 11 crew-signed photos and a Neil Armstrong signed photo board!
122 could be okay — Richard did show me dozens of in-person samples over the years that at least resemble this signature. There are some authentic traits in this signature and knowing that Richard often got Armstrong signatures at golf tournaments in most unusual signing positions I would expect quiet some discussions in the future for his other in-person signatures. There are much "worse" authentic styles in his collection.

JasonIUP
Member

Posts: 282
From: PA
Registered: Apr 2004

posted 08-26-2016 01:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for JasonIUP   Click Here to Email JasonIUP     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Florian, out of the three lots, this is the closest, I agree. "Neil" is generally fine, but the "A" is not smooth. Plus, the line that Neil used to cross the "A" is more rounded than normal. The "tg" connection is rushed, but I've seen it before in real examples, so that doesn't detract. It may be a rushed "in-person" version, but it is odd enough that I would stay away.

Dave_Johnson
Member

Posts: 106
From:
Registered: Feb 2014

posted 08-26-2016 01:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dave_Johnson   Click Here to Email Dave_Johnson     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Not related to the signatures but to the questionability of the auction overall, Lot 2 is highly doubtful as being a meteorite. It appears to be industrial slag. Iron nickel meteorites do not contain stone inclusions such as shown. I own a small fragment of Canyon Diablo.

Also, the vague wording such as "Attributed to..." and "likely museum quality" adds to the doubt.

mode1charlie
Member

Posts: 1169
From: Honolulu, HI
Registered: Sep 2010

posted 08-26-2016 09:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for mode1charlie   Click Here to Email mode1charlie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dave_Johnson:
Lot 2 is highly doubtful as being a meteorite.
Agreed. Genuine meteorites do not show porosity like the specimen in the photo, and Canyon Diablo typically doesn't have regmaglypts anyway. Highly suspect. I would stay far away from this one.

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4437
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 08-26-2016 10:05 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Looks like slag to me...

albatron
Member

Posts: 2732
From: Stuart, Florida
Registered: Jun 2000

posted 08-26-2016 10:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for albatron   Click Here to Email albatron     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
In Lot 23, the Milt Thompson signed cover is not good, and I'm no fan of the Pete Knight either.

rgarner
Member

Posts: 1193
From: Shepperton, United Kingdom
Registered: Mar 2012

posted 08-27-2016 02:45 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rgarner   Click Here to Email rgarner     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Does it really cost so much to hire an authenticator? One would think with authentication they could actually achieve higher prices (and thus make up for the costs of said authenticator). But maybe I'm just taking an overly simplistic view.

Larry McGlynn
Member

Posts: 1255
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Jul 2003

posted 08-27-2016 09:02 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Larry McGlynn   Click Here to Email Larry McGlynn     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I have a two pound iron chunk of the Diablo Canyon meteorite directly from the gift shop at Meteor Crater. Stonely bought a rock of volcanic origin more likely found in Hawaii.

Alan Lipkin
Member

Posts: 78
From: Beverly Hills, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2006

posted 08-30-2016 12:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Alan Lipkin   Click Here to Email Alan Lipkin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Working on the questions regarding autographs above. Hope to get some high resolution scans this week and respond by early next week.

Note: there is nothing that I can do about too many duplicate autographs. If the client wants to sell bunches, we sell bunches (normally at a very reasonable price).

rgarner
Member

Posts: 1193
From: Shepperton, United Kingdom
Registered: Mar 2012

posted 08-30-2016 01:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rgarner   Click Here to Email rgarner     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Just because people pay a ''reasonable price'' doesn't mean what they receive will be real, and frankly, there is no such thing as a reasonable price for a fake.

I may not even bid on RS autographs anymore, let alone bid high - nor am I the only one from what friends tell me.

My advice, just hire an authenticator. I'm pretty sure Steve Zarelli (and probably others) offers this very service.

neo1022
Member

Posts: 281
From: Santa Monica, CA
Registered: Jun 2013

posted 08-31-2016 02:53 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for neo1022   Click Here to Email neo1022     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
That "meteorite" is painful to even look at. Hard to tell without having the physical specimen, but it sure looks volcanic (or perhaps slag). And if this slipped through the (apparently very large) cracks, it makes you wonder about everything.

JasonIUP
Member

Posts: 282
From: PA
Registered: Apr 2004

posted 08-31-2016 06:18 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for JasonIUP   Click Here to Email JasonIUP     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I think the best approach that bidders can take is to judge Regency's items for themselves. If you don't know enough about an item to feel confident in its authenticity, it's not the item for you. To think that all items are suspect because a few are is a long stretch.

rgarner
Member

Posts: 1193
From: Shepperton, United Kingdom
Registered: Mar 2012

posted 08-31-2016 07:08 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rgarner   Click Here to Email rgarner     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I have to disagree, collecting shouldn't be elitist.

jtheoret
Member

Posts: 344
From: Albuquerque, NM USA
Registered: Jul 2003

posted 08-31-2016 09:30 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jtheoret   Click Here to Email jtheoret     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I don't think its necessarily "elitist" — there isn't a collector or auction house out there that has been right 100% of the time, and even the people I believe are the most knowledgeable and experienced sometimes disagree. The caveat of let the buyer beware is a collectors mantra.

I've gotten some great deals from Regency. I am not sure how an autopen can get through and some of the more well known forgery styles should be known to them as well, but I tend to agree that a few questionable items to not make everything suspect. If you didn't see it signed in your presence (or get an item through the mail from an astronaut directly) there is no way to ever be 100% sure. Don't bid if you're not comfortable with an item.

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4437
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 08-31-2016 11:02 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Look back through prior threads addressing Regency Superior auctions/concerns with the way it approaches authentication. Clear emerging trend line.

moonnut
Member

Posts: 248
From: Andover, MN
Registered: Apr 2013

posted 08-31-2016 06:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for moonnut   Click Here to Email moonnut     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I believe if this was an eBay auction it could be expected as eBay we all know isn't monitored. The fact that collectors are upset by Regency's apparent unmonitored space auction is that those collectors are paying outrageous fees — 20% buyer's premium. Also Regency collects 20% seller's fees. That's 40% per item! There are buyers that solely base items being legit by reputation of the auction house. Not a good basis but it happens. So Regency rakes it in on customer loyalty.

First clue for us space collectors to watch out for ourselves is the fact their website is regencystamps.com. It doesn't say regencyspace.com. Their specialty is stamps and I think they should stick to that (ha, no pun intended). But since they have ventured into other realms they need to hire the proper personnel to maintain legitimacy. If they don't they only damage their reputation.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 08-31-2016 06:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by moonnut:
Their specialty is stamps and I think they should stick to that...
Alan Lipkin was part of the original Superior Galleries that hosted the first regularly-scheduled, live space auctions. He and the late Michael Orenstein basically set the space memorabilia sale foundation for other auction houses to follow.

So to suggest that Alan is a newcomer to space is somewhat backwards. He's been doing this longer than many in the market today.

That's not to say that Regency doesn't have areas where it could improve, it does. But as long as I have known Alan — and that dates back to the same year cS came online — he has always been receptive to feedback, eager to help and a source of knowledge on a number of subjects related to this field.

stsmithva
Member

Posts: 1933
From: Fairfax, VA, USA
Registered: Feb 2007

posted 08-31-2016 07:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for stsmithva   Click Here to Email stsmithva     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by moonnut:
That's 40% per item!

...since they have ventured into other realms they need to hire the proper personnel to maintain legitimacy.


I agree that there should be an expectation that the consignment fee and buyer's premium don't just go towards producing a catalog and running the auction. The auction house should authenticate and ideally research further the items. Both consignor and buyer are happy when that happens. As a consignor I have had a couple of bad experiences with auction houses that were sloppy, and I won't consign with them any more.

As a buyer I avoid auction houses that allow obvious forgeries, especially painful ones.

As for the other point, actually, the "Superior" part of Regency-Superior was the original space auctioneer. Their 1993 auction is the stuff of legend. The last few auctions have, I'm afraid, taken them down a few notches.

Alan Lipkin
Member

Posts: 78
From: Beverly Hills, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2006

posted 09-02-2016 12:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Alan Lipkin   Click Here to Email Alan Lipkin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Please take note of the following changes in the upcoming space Memorabilia catalog. Lot Number 120, 121, 134, 135, 145, 163 Withdrawn.

Lot 121, per the late consignor Richard Stonely, was signed by Neil Armstrong in person on a golf course in Houston, TX... as with many rushed signatures as pointed out by Florian, there are anomalies.

Thanks to all for your input.

JasonIUP
Member

Posts: 282
From: PA
Registered: Apr 2004

posted 09-02-2016 04:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for JasonIUP   Click Here to Email JasonIUP     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
120 may have been signed on a golf course, but not by Neil. Even so, that doesn't explain why the other two look off.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 09-02-2016 06:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by JasonIUP:
...but not by Neil.
Knowing Stonely's history and how he obtained many of his autographs, it is completely plausible it was signed by Armstrong. Suffice to say, the fact that the autograph may have been rushed is not the only factor why an atypical signature may have been given.

akinnaird
Member

Posts: 30
From: Arlington, VA, US
Registered: Dec 2013

posted 09-13-2016 06:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for akinnaird   Click Here to Email akinnaird     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It looks like all of the Michael Collins watercolors have been signed as M. Collins, not Michael Collins as all of the paintings currently on Novaspace have been. The ones on auction also all seem to be significantly older. Did his painting signature change over the years?

Chuckster01
Member

Posts: 873
From: Orlando, FL
Registered: Jan 2014

posted 09-13-2016 07:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Chuckster01   Click Here to Email Chuckster01     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I was just reading another thread about how his older signatures were Michael and he later condensed to M Collins or Mike Collins.

I have no idea on his artwork signatures.

Bob M
Member

Posts: 1746
From: Atlanta-area, GA USA
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 09-25-2016 11:05 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Bob M   Click Here to Email Bob M     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
With the Regency-Superior/Richard Stonely auction ending soon on Sept. 29, it's important to alert bidders of some additional autograph problem lots, other than the several lots that have been properly withdrawn.

Besides myself, several others have noted additional lots that range from questionable, that bidders should avoid, to others fairly obviously bad.

  • As noted above, Lot 23, with several X-15 signed covers, contains very suspect Thompson and Knight signatures, with the key autograph, Walker's, also suspect.

  • Lot 119, Apollo 10 cover, is suspect, with at least a bad Stafford.

  • Lot 146, Apollo 14 cover, with at least a bad Shepard.

  • Lot 255, a very questionable Armstrong stamp sheet.

  • And lot 97, Apollo 7 cover, previously judged okay, has been questioned because of the Eisele signature that compares closely to known Eisele German fakes.

bklyn55
Member

Posts: 361
From: Milford, CT
Registered: Dec 2014

posted 09-26-2016 06:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for bklyn55   Click Here to Email bklyn55     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Anyone have an opinion on Lot 106, the Bill Anders signature?

Bob M
Member

Posts: 1746
From: Atlanta-area, GA USA
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 09-27-2016 09:12 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Bob M   Click Here to Email Bob M     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Many agree that lot 106, Apollo 8 crew signed cover, is something to avoid.

Chuckster01
Member

Posts: 873
From: Orlando, FL
Registered: Jan 2014

posted 09-29-2016 03:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Chuckster01   Click Here to Email Chuckster01     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I missed today's auction but from looking at the results it would appear the final price on many items were amazingly low with a lot of passed lots. Did not look like a great day for a space auction unless you where buying.

davidcwagner
Member

Posts: 799
From: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Registered: Jan 2003

posted 09-29-2016 04:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for davidcwagner   Click Here to Email davidcwagner     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I won Lot 14, the 1928 Charles Lindbergh signed print, for a very low price $425. Opinions on this item welcomed.

milkit1
Member

Posts: 271
From: Springfield Illinois USA
Registered: Sep 2015

posted 09-29-2016 07:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for milkit1   Click Here to Email milkit1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I won the space plate signed by 19 and the Grissom and Young autographs.

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4437
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 09-29-2016 07:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Doesn't appear the Diablo meteorwrong sold either.

cosmos-walter
Member

Posts: 691
From: Salzburg, Austria
Registered: Jun 2003

posted 10-01-2016 08:18 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for cosmos-walter   Click Here to Email cosmos-walter     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Did anybody of you win the great Alan Bean and the desirable Alexey Leonov originals?

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement