Topic: Blue Origin New Shepard: Mission 31 (NS-31)
Robert Pearlman Editor
Posts: 54472 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
posted 02-27-2025 08:11 AM
Blue Origin release
Blue Origin Announces Crew For New Shepard's 31st Mission
New Shepard's 11th Human Flight, NS-31, Will Launch This Spring with Aisha Bowe, Amanda Nguyen, Gayle King, Katy Perry, Kerianne Flynn, and Lauren Sánchez
Blue Origin today announced the six people flying on its NS-31 mission. The crew includes Aisha Bowe, Amanda Nguyen, Gayle King, Katy Perry, Kerianne Flynn, and Lauren Sánchez, who brought the mission together. She is honored to lead a team of explorers on a mission that will challenge their perspectives of Earth, empower them to share their own stories, and create lasting impact that will inspire generations to come.
Meet the NS-31 Crew
Aisha Bowe Aisha is a former NASA rocket scientist, entrepreneur, and global STEM advocate. She is the CEO of STEMBoard, an engineering firm recognized twice on the Inc. 5000 list of America's fastest-growing private companies, and the founder of LINGO, an edtech company on a mission to equip one million students with essential tech skills. Of Bahamian heritage, Aisha hopes her journey from community college to space will inspire young people in the Bahamas and around the world to pursue their dreams.
Amanda Nguyen Amanda is a bioastronautics research scientist. She graduated from Harvard, and conducted research at Harvard Center for Astrophysics, MIT, NASA, and International Institute for Astronautical Sciences. Amanda worked on the last NASA shuttle mission, STS-135, and the Kepler exoplanet mission. For her advocacy for sexual violence survivors, she was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize and awarded TIME's Woman of the Year. As the first Vietnamese and Southeast Asian woman astronaut, Amanda's flight is a symbol of reconciliation between the United States and Vietnam, and will highlight science as a tool for peace.
Gayle King Gayle is an award-winning journalist, co-host of CBS Mornings, editor-at-large of Oprah Daily, and the host of Gayle King in the House on SiriusXM radio. In a career spanning decades, King has been recognized as a gifted, compassionate interviewer able to break through the noise and create meaningful conversations. As someone who is staying open to new adventures, even ones that scare her, Gayle is honored to be part of Blue Origin's first all-female flight team and is looking forward to stepping out of her comfort zone.
Katy Perry Katy is the biggest-selling female artist in Capitol Records' history and one of the best-selling music artists of all time with over 115 billion streams. Aside from being a global pop superstar, Katy is an active advocate of many philanthropic causes, including as a UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador where she uses her powerful voice to ensure every child's right to health, education, equality, and protection, and her own Firework Foundation, which empowers children from underserved communities by igniting their inner light through the arts. Katy is honored to be a part of Blue Origin's first all-female crew and hopes her journey encourages her daughter and others to reach for the stars, literally and figuratively.
Kerianne Flynn After a successful career in fashion and human resources, Kerianne Flynn has spent the last decade channeling her energy into community-building through board service and nonprofit work with The Allen-Stevenson School, The High Line, and Hudson River Park. Passionate about the transformative power of storytelling, Kerianne has produced thought-provoking films such as This Changes Everything (2018), which explores the history of women in Hollywood, and LILLY (2024), a powerful tribute to fair-pay advocate Lilly Ledbetter. Kerianne has always been drawn to exploration, adventure, and space, and hopes her Blue Origin space flight serves as an inspiration for her son, Dex, and the next generation of dreamers to reach for the stars.
Lauren Sánchez Lauren is an Emmy Award-winning journalist, New York Times bestselling author, pilot, Vice Chair of the Bezos Earth Fund, and mother of three. In 2016, Sánchez, a licensed helicopter pilot, founded Black Ops Aviation, the first female-owned and operated aerial film and production company. Sánchez released her New York Times bestselling debut children's book, The Fly Who Flew to Space, in 2024. Her work in aviation earned her the Elling Halvorson Vertical Flight Hall of Fame Award in 2024 for her expertise as a helicopter pilot and aviation businesswoman. Sánchez's goal is to inspire the next generation of explorers.
This mission will be the 11th human flight for the New Shepard program and the 31st in its history. To date, the program has flown 52 people above the Kármán line, the internationally recognized boundary of space. This is the first all-female flight crew since Valentina Tereshkova's solo spaceflight in 1963.
The flight will launch this spring.
Robert Pearlman Editor
Posts: 54472 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
posted 03-27-2025 08:04 AM
Blue Origin announced that NS-31 will lift off from Launch Site One in West Texas on Monday, April 14.
The New Shepard launch window opens at 8:30 a.m. CDT (1330 GMT).
SpaceAholic Member
Posts: 5455 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
posted 03-28-2025 10:57 AM
Star Trek actor William Shatner shared "CBS Mornings" co-hosts Gayle King should expect from the experience:
Robert Pearlman Editor
Posts: 54472 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
A pop star, two journalists, a rocket scientist, an activist, and a filmmaker walk into a room. That may sound like the setup for a punchline, but it's actually the all-star lineup of Blue Origin's historic all-female space crew, which includes Katy Perry, Lauren Sánchez, Gayle King, Aisha Bowe, Amanda Nguyen, and Kerianne Flynn.
Fittingly, it's the third week of Women's History Month when the group assembles in person for the very first time at their ELLE cover shoot, and everywhere you look, people are buzzing with excitement, ready to write the next chapter. "We're a crew!" the women shout in unison once they meet.
Each is rocking her version of an all-black power look. There are fitted pantsuits, deep V-cuts, embellishments down the sides of sleeves and pants, touches of leather, and towering stiletto heels. As they huddle, the charged energy filling the air hints that the reality of the thrilling mission is beginning to sink in. There had been a couple of one-on-one hangouts and video calls ahead of this meeting, but this marks their first chance to gather together as a team with the only other women on Earth who could understand how they are feeling.
Robert Pearlman Editor
Posts: 54472 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-14-2025 09:36 AM
Key stats from New Shepard's NS-31 mission:
The crew capsule reached an apogee of 346,802 ft AGL / 350,449 ft MSL (106 km AGL / 107 km MSL).
The booster reached an apogee of 346,481 ft AGL / 350,128 ft MSL (106 km AGL / 107 km MSL).
Official launch time was 8:30:00 AM CDT / 13:30:00 UTC.
Capsule landing occurred at 8:40:21 AM CDT / 13:40:21 UTC.
The mission elapsed time was 10 minutes, 21 seconds.
Robert Pearlman Editor
Posts: 54472 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-14-2025 12:21 PM
Blue Origin release
Blue Origin's New Shepard Rocket Completes 31st Mission To Space
Blue Origin successfully completed its 11th human spaceflight for the New Shepard program. The astronaut crew included Aisha Bowe, Amanda Nguyễn, Gayle King, Katy Perry, Kerianne Flynn, and Lauren Sánchez, who brought the mission together.
Including today's crew, New Shepard has now flown 58 people to space, including four people who have flown twice.
"What a privilege to witness this crew of trailblazers depart the capsule today," said Phil Joyce, Senior Vice President, New Shepard. "Each of these women is a storyteller who will use their voices—individually and together—to channel their life-changing experience today into creating lasting impact that will inspire people across our planet for generations. Thank you to this remarkable crew for uplifting so many on their historic journey toward the stars and back."
Robert Pearlman Editor
Posts: 54472 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-14-2025 02:53 PM
Blue Origin release
Replay: New Shepard Mission NS-31 Press Conference
SpaceAholic Member
Posts: 5455 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-15-2025 05:06 PM
quote:Originally posted by Robert Pearlman: The astronaut crew...
They are no more "astronauts" then any passenger who travels on a commercial flight.
dom Member
Posts: 1123 From: Registered: Aug 2001
posted 04-15-2025 05:40 PM
I think commercial spaceflight finally “jumped the shark” with this flight.
Robert Pearlman Editor
Posts: 54472 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-15-2025 07:00 PM
We have had this debate before.
The Association of Space Explorers recognizes Blue Origin's New Shepard passengers as astronauts by including them as eligible for the Universal Astronaut pin (suborbital version).
The Fédération Aéronautique Internationale is the world's ruling body for aeronautical and astronautical records. As such, they have a definition for who and who is not an astronaut, and as cited on their website, it is a function of altitude.
There has now been more than 100 people who have flown suborbital flights without having ever entered orbit. At some point, the number of people who will have done so will result in a self-correction as to what they call themselves, so the need to gate keep now seems unnecessary.
issman1 Member
Posts: 1166 From: UK Registered: Apr 2005
posted 04-16-2025 12:45 AM
I have no problem with Blue Origin (or Virgin Galactic) paying customers being called astronauts.
But the mainstream media coverage, even here in Britain, was unexpected. I suppose the participation of two American celebrities, Katy Perry and Gayle King, made it newsworthy (like Jeff Bezos's tumble after they touched down).
Most critics missed the point however: NS-31 was pure and simply space tourism. That rocket is only designed to reach the edge of space so the capsule occupants can enjoy the view and experience three minutes of weightlessness. They reached 65 miles, so by all definitions are astronauts, just like some X-15 pilots in the 1960s.
Too bad that NASA did not fly an all-female crew on its shuttle orbiter. Though I won't be surprised if/when it happens on a privately-funded SpaceX orbital mission in the future.
Robert Pearlman Editor
Posts: 54472 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-16-2025 09:25 AM
From ESA astronaut Tim Peake:
There has been a lot of comment about Blue Origin's flight this week.
In amongst the noise and media attention given to some of the more well known passengers, it's important to highlight that onboard there were two incredible STEM ambassadors.
Aisha Bowe is an award winning aerospace engineer and STEM tech entrepreneur and CEO. Amanda Nguyễn is a bioastronautics research scientist, civil rights activist and campaigner who has been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize.
The discussions as to whether these very short duration flights add much value beyond getting people to talk about space will go on and are valuable to have. They shouldn't distract from the important work that is ongoing with space-based R&D and STEM advocacy by people for whom this is their lifelong career and passion.
SpaceAholic Member
Posts: 5455 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-16-2025 05:53 PM
At least one of the space tourists (Gayle King) is comparing the significance of their flight to that of Alan Shepard/Freedom 7's mission - (non-analogous events in many significant ways).
Robert Pearlman Editor
Posts: 54472 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-16-2025 06:08 PM
From what I could tell, King wasn't commenting on the historical significance. Rather, she was describing the significance of what she experienced — the physical seriousness of the launch.
I really resent that people are calling it a ride.
We duplicated the trajectory of Alan Shepard's flight back in the day. No one called that a "ride." A ride sounds frivolous. It sounds insignificant.
This was a bona fide flight. I don't like people trying to minimalizing what was done here.
If you listen to and read her comments since starting before the flight, she was very nervous about going. She does not like flying on a plane, let alone a rocket, and was talked into going by her friends and family, who emphasized how it was a once in a lifetime opportunity.
She heard people describing the launch as a roller coaster ride, and to her, it was nothing of the sort. She found the physical experience to be much more than a ride, no different from what Shepard went through in 1961.
mercsim Member
Posts: 263 From: Phoenix, AZ Registered: Feb 2007
posted 04-16-2025 07:15 PM
Comparing just the G profile, it was nothing like Shepard's flight. Also, he was facing a TON of unknowns related to space flight. Splashing down in the open ocean was also a major part of his mission.
The only similarity to Shepard's flight was that it was suborbital. Any other comparison is almost an insult to the great pioneers of early spaceflight.
GACspaceguy Member
Posts: 3173 From: Guyton, GA Registered: Jan 2006
posted 04-16-2025 07:35 PM
Am I correct in saying that New Shepard does not require a heat shield?
Mercury Redstone flights required a heat shield, albeit different than Mercury-Atlas due to lower-level heating compared to orbital flights.
oly Member
Posts: 1490 From: Perth, Western Australia Registered: Apr 2015
posted 04-16-2025 07:36 PM
quote:Originally posted by mercsim: Comparing just the G profile, it was nothing like Shepard's flight.
Shepard was a qualified test pilot with a lot of experience with high g levels, the technical aspects of aircraft, and many hours in the air, which I doubt he had a fear of flying.
King admits to a fear of flight, probably does not have Shepard's high g training and experience, is probably not familiar with the technical aspects of aircraft, and did not go through the same selection and training process for flight.
I guess to her, she can compare what she experienced to what people understand that of Shepard's. Until I get to go, I just have to trust what the people who do get to experience it can describe.
issman1 Member
Posts: 1166 From: UK Registered: Apr 2005
posted 04-17-2025 12:50 AM
The criticism largely emanates from a tiny cross-section of American society which indulges in envy, grievance and victimhood.
The most bizarre take on NS-31 was that its most famous crewmember, Katy Perry, had somehow contributed towards the demise of planet Earth! So imagine the furore if she had chose to fly with Elon Musk's SpaceX?
dom Member
Posts: 1123 From: Registered: Aug 2001
posted 04-17-2025 06:35 AM
These flights are just overt displays of wealth that most people are sick of by now. The expression 'Fiddling whilst Rome Burns' comes to mind. My passion for spaceflight doesn't extend to having a positive view of all this...
perineau Member
Posts: 416 From: FRANCE Registered: Jul 2007
posted 04-17-2025 09:05 AM
Have to admit that "dreams" are a lot easier to attain when one has a half a million dollars to pay for them!
ejectr Member
Posts: 2042 From: Killingly, CT Registered: Mar 2002
posted 04-17-2025 09:18 AM
I believe they choose who they do not because of their bank account status, but their popularity. Who would care or pay attention to Jane Doe being a passenger.
GACspaceguy Member
Posts: 3173 From: Guyton, GA Registered: Jan 2006
posted 04-17-2025 09:40 AM
quote:Originally posted by ejectr: Who would care or pay attention to Jane Doe being a passenger.
Which certainly was just validated by the lack of media on the Fram2 mission which in my opinion should have been media rich.
Robert Pearlman Editor
Posts: 54472 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-17-2025 10:24 AM
Fram2 was not very media friendly. They only issued periodic updates on X, their website remained unchanged throughout the entire flight, there were no crew press conferences pre- or post-flight and no broadcasts during the mission.
NS-31 also had limited press access, but was broadcast from start to finish and the post-flight press conference was posted for all to watch.
GACspaceguy Member
Posts: 3173 From: Guyton, GA Registered: Jan 2006
posted 04-17-2025 02:19 PM
I get it, the posts you gave us were much more than anything out on TV media.
Also, of course the NS-31 flight was much shorter to broadcast than Fram2.
ejectr Member
Posts: 2042 From: Killingly, CT Registered: Mar 2002
posted 04-19-2025 09:20 AM
I just call the Blue Origin participants "space travelers". They really aren't "professional astronauts" that live the daily life of an extremely trained individual.
Robert Pearlman Editor
Posts: 54472 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-19-2025 11:47 AM
The Mercury astronauts were called "astronauts" from the first day they were announced to the public, before they had undergone a day's worth of spaceflight training, let alone flew into space. No one tried to strip Deke Slayton of the status of astronaut after he was grounded with no knowledge if he would ever be cleared to fly into space.
It wasn't until the space shuttle program that NASA distinguished between astronaut candidates and astronauts. Sure, they had silver and gold astronaut pins, but both were astronaut pins.
X-15 pilots only became "astronauts" after they flew past a certain altitude. It had nothing to do with their level of experience or that they were in control of the rocket plane at the time. They earned their astronaut badge because they had exceeded 50 miles (80 kilometers) in altitude.
SpaceX designed its Dragon spacecraft to never need the input or control of anyone on board on a nominal flight. NASA and international career astronauts have flown to and from the space station without having to do anything more than monitoring flat panel displays, yet we do not suggest they are passengers or travelers or any other term than "astronauts."
So it seems a bit like historical revisionism to try to suggest that because the purpose of the mission was space tourism that the people on board New Shepard are not also astronauts.
SpaceAholic Member
Posts: 5455 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-19-2025 01:42 PM
Mercury, Gemini and Apollo candidates endured physical and emotional challenges associated with selection and training as professional flight vehicle operators/crewmembers prior to being designated astronauts and were exposed to thresholds of novel risk that doesn't even remotely equate to NS-31 passenger roles.
SpaceX crew members may allow the vehicle to fly autonomously during "nominal" conditions but they too are trained to intervene and operate the vehicle if required.
Robert Pearlman Editor
Posts: 54472 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-19-2025 03:38 PM
So if Blue Origin put its clients through the same amount and type of training as Mercury, Gemini and Apollo astronauts went through (even if there was no justified reason to do so), would everyone then accept the company's clients as astronauts?
I just don't see that happening.
SpaceAholic Member
Posts: 5455 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-19-2025 04:25 PM
There is no justified reason for specialized training because they are not fullfilling professional workroles as crewmembers.
Robert Pearlman Editor
Posts: 54472 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-19-2025 04:31 PM
They go under the type of training required by the type of spaceflight.
They do go under some of the same training as NASA astronauts, including becoming familiar with the sounds the rocket and spacecraft will make; knowing when to prepare for increased g-levels; learning how to egress and ingress their seat and strap themselves in; and basics of maneuvering in microgravity. They do not need to learn how to fly the spacecraft, because the spacecraft flies itself.
So why should the amount and type of training, which is mission and spacecraft specific, be a factor when determining who is an astronaut?
SpaceAholic Member
Posts: 5455 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-19-2025 04:53 PM
Its a transactional relationship for a brief (and for most a one off) experience in which the rider is unable to influence mission outcome. Doesnt make them professionals/astronauts.
SpaceSteve Member
Posts: 444 From: San Antonio TX, USA Registered: Apr 2004
posted 04-23-2025 05:04 PM
I agree with Chuck Yeager, who once said that the Mercury astronauts were nothing more than "Spam in a can". I consider all these passengers to be the same... "Spam in a can".
Put another way: If these passengers are considered to be astronauts, then shouldn't everyone of us who gets in and travels by airplane, be considered an aviator?
Actually, I might just use this to my advantage.
I retired from the US Air Force as a MSgt (E-7); and back when I was a junior Airman, I got an incentive ride in a T-37 Tweet. I actually took the controls and flew the airplane for a while; even did a couple of aileron rolls. I had previously spent a semester in junior college, taking a basic aeronautics course.
So, I guess that means I can call myself a pilot.
Robert Pearlman Editor
Posts: 54472 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
posted 04-23-2025 08:50 PM
quote:Originally posted by SpaceSteve: ...then shouldn't everyone of us who gets in and travels by airplane, be considered an aviator?
It is ironic you should write that; when aviation was still new, everyone who flew on a plane, regardless of their role on board, were called aviators. Even the first paying passengers were aviators.
No one told them to stop using that term. It just naturally happened when enough people had flown. I believe the same will happen with the term astronaut. When enough people have flown into space, the term will drop back to its pre-tourism use.