Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Commercial Space - Military Space
  [Discuss] Boeing Starliner Pad Abort Test

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   [Discuss] Boeing Starliner Pad Abort Test
Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 10-11-2019 04:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Please use this topic to discuss Boeing's CST-100 Starliner Pad Abort Test at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 10-11-2019 04:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
NASA and Boeing have announced a new target date for the Pad Abort Test:
Boeing Pad Abort Test: Nov. 4, 2019 at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 10-31-2019 10:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
From NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, via Twitter:
Thank you to Boeing. At my request, Monday's [Nov. 4] commercial crew Starliner pad abort test will be broadcast live. Transparency for the taxpayer.
From Boeing, in response:
We join you in your enthusiasm to share this Starliner test with the world live. Targeting a T-0 of 7 a.m. MT with a three-hour test window on Monday, Nov. 4. Tune into NASA TV

thisismills
Member

Posts: 263
From: Michigan
Registered: Mar 2012

posted 11-01-2019 06:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for thisismills   Click Here to Email thisismills     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
In this photo it looks like the ascent cover has been signed by several people.

Anyone know the story?

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 11-01-2019 06:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I've requested further details, but Boeing confirmed those are the signatures of the CST-100 Starliner team and contractors.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 11-04-2019 07:41 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
From Boeing on Twitter:
If you look closely at the Starliner Pad Abort spacecraft, you see the signatures of the employees who have dedicated thousands of hours to making it reality. Well wishes, famous quotes, hopes, dreams, even family members' names - they've all given so much to make it happen.

hlbjr
Member

Posts: 475
From: Delray Beach Florida USA
Registered: Mar 2006

posted 11-04-2019 08:37 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for hlbjr   Click Here to Email hlbjr     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The abort test went pretty well except only two of the three main parachutes deployed.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 11-04-2019 09:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
From the video, it appears that all three main parachutes deployed, but only two unfurled. Starliner is qualified to land safely on two parachutes, so the test is still considered a success.

As Chris Ferguson said after the test:

I had this trajectory of what this pad abort would look like for a long time and to actually see it happen was just fantastic. And it worked pretty much as I had always envisioned.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 11-04-2019 09:42 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
From Kathy Lueders, NASA's Commercial Crew Program manager:
Tests like this one are crucial to help us make sure the systems are as safe as possible. We are thrilled with the preliminary results, and now we have the job of really digging into the data and analyzing whether everything worked as we expected.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 11-04-2019 10:26 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Boeing statement
Today's pad abort test was a milestone achievement for our CST-100 Starliner team, for NASA, and for American human spaceflight. We will review the data to determine how all the systems performed, including the parachute deployment sequence.

We did have a deployment anomaly, not a parachute failure. It's too early to determine why all three main parachutes did not deploy, however, having two of three deploy successfully is acceptable for the test parameters and crew safety.

At this time, we don't expect any impact to our scheduled Dec. 17 Orbital Flight Test. Going forward we will do everything needed to ensure safe orbital flights with crew.

Headshot
Member

Posts: 864
From: Vancouver, WA, USA
Registered: Feb 2012

posted 11-04-2019 03:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Headshot   Click Here to Email Headshot     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I know there was a "dummy" on board to simulate a crew member. Was additional mass placed on board to simulate a full crew load?

oly
Member

Posts: 905
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: Apr 2015

posted 11-05-2019 06:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for oly   Click Here to Email oly     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Over the past few days I have read conflicting stories that describe the third parachute deployment anomaly as it either failed to deploy, or, it deployed but was separated from the vehicle during inflation.

Has any additional information been released?

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 11-05-2019 07:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The test was yesterday morning; Boeing said it would take two to three days to collect the spacecraft and begin analyzing the data collected.

Chris Ferguson shared a little more in an interview with Spaceflight Now:

"Some of the folks who have the opportunity to go back and review it say that the pilot chute did come out, but then we don't know what happened after that," Ferguson told Spaceflight Now. "The pilot chute is designed to pull the main chute out, and we confirmed that the pilot chute came out, which means that the mortar that fires the pilot chute functioned properly, but what happened beyond that, it's too early to speculate."

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 11-06-2019 03:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Boeing will host a conference call with media at 1:30 p.m. EST on Thursday, Nov. 7 to address preliminary results of the pad abort test.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 11-07-2019 12:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Boeing has identified the root cause of main parachute deployment issue as "a lack of secure connection between the pilot chute and the main chute." A pin that was to hold the linkage between the pilot and main chute had been incorrectly inserted.

The conclusion was reached based on close-out photos and inspection of the post-test hardware. The issue was not detected because a protective abbrasion sheath prevented view of the connecting lines.

Boeing plans to take additional steps to mitigate this problem, including pull tests and additional inspections going forward. For the immediate future, engineers are now verifying that the linkages between all of the parachutes are secure on the Orbital Flight Test vehicle.

Otherwise, Boeing has now verified that all other systems aboard Starliner worked as expected, including the abort engines, the separation lines and the thrusters that oriented the spacecraft during flight.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 11-07-2019 03:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Boeing video
Go behind the scenes during Starliner's first flight that successfully put the Pad Abort system to the test. Watch the entire flight in real time with our photographer at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico, as Starliner's launch abort engines ignite, propelling the vehicle roughly a mile up (approx. 1.6 km) and a mile away from the test stand in just about 90 seconds.

oly
Member

Posts: 905
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: Apr 2015

posted 11-07-2019 04:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for oly   Click Here to Email oly     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Robert Pearlman:
"a lack of secure connection between the pilot chute and the main chute."

Connecting the pilot chute to the main chute is a fundamental step that any technician or rigger who works on parachutes, ejection seats, or even brake chutes have trained for. There are steps and inspections that cross-check these things carried out by others and certified within the associated documentation. In the aviation/aerospace industry, such practices are second nature, designed to catch such oversights. and something that is generally thought to be inexcusable to overlook.

Quality checks and systems are designed to mitigate the risk of such things happening and any breakdown of procedure or failure of the safety or quality systems is generally something that makes big news. While NASA and Boeing were quick to reiterate that the vehicle design incorporated the loss of one main chute, serious questions should be raised about how such a step was overlooked. Consider what may have been if more than one main chute failed to deploy.

Headshot
Member

Posts: 864
From: Vancouver, WA, USA
Registered: Feb 2012

posted 11-08-2019 10:20 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Headshot   Click Here to Email Headshot     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I agree with Oly. The incorrect installation of the pin is bad. For that situation not to be discovered/corrected by Boeing prior to such an important test is even worse and could give a whole new connotation to Boeing's "Fewer Steps to the Moon" campaign.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement