Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

Websites
related space history websites

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Commercial Space - Military Space
  [Discuss] Boeing Company's CST-100 spacecraft

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   [Discuss] Boeing Company's CST-100 spacecraft
Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 29892
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 08-03-2012 09:58 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Editor's note: In an effort to keep the topic CCDev: Boeing Company CST-100 crew capsule focused on status updates, reader's feedback and opinions are directed to this thread.

Please use this topic to discuss the Boeing Company's development of its CST-100 spacecraft as a part of NASA's Commercial Crew Development (CCDev) program.

onesmallstep
Member

Posts: 716
From: Staten Island, New York USA
Registered: Nov 2007

posted 07-24-2013 08:48 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for onesmallstep   Click Here to Email onesmallstep     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Here's hoping that Boeing has gotten its act together and ensures a rigorous quality control, safety and testing program for this spacecraft, unlike their 787 Dreamliner. The passenger jet has received bad press due to a recent spate of fires and inadequate testing of its batteries (the same kind of tests done on CELL PHONE batteries? Really?) I think the nation's space program — not to mention the lives of astronauts who will ride aboard CST-100- demands nothing less than excellence.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 29892
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 07-24-2013 09:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
To be fair, comparing the lithium ion batteries in your cell phone to the ones used to power the 787 is a bit like comparing the tires on your car to those that were used by the space shuttle. They both include the same materials but the engineering behind them is an order of magnitude different.

In the case of the 787, it wasn't as if Boeing didn't test them, as Wired reported earlier this year:

The batteries and the airplane as a whole did undergo the most rigorous flight test certification program in airliner history. The lithium-ion batteries were approved by the FAA in 2007 after years of testing and debate over their use on the 787.
And then again, in this report describing the redesign:
Boeing's previous battery tests during original certification included crushing cells, driving nails through them and intentionally introducing short circuits to induce failure. Boeing found "nothing adverse happened" during these tests, and so it expected the battery's box and existing internal protection to be sufficient. The company says it followed the certification process set out by the FAA.
It should also be noted that Boeing has a contract with NASA to provide the same lithium-ion batteries that power the 787 for use on the International Space Station. The batteries will be installed outside the modules on an unpressurized structural hoist.

onesmallstep
Member

Posts: 716
From: Staten Island, New York USA
Registered: Nov 2007

posted 07-24-2013 10:21 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for onesmallstep   Click Here to Email onesmallstep     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Point taken, Robert, but there are also those issues with the wiring and fires. Sloppiness at best, or serious neglect at worst. Of course, mass-producing a commercial jetliner for many customers is different from providing a spacecraft to one - but safety, above all, should be paramount in both vehicles, no? The tires on a car should not fail no more than those that were used on shuttle - the lives on board depend on it. Hopefully, Col. Chris Ferguson, STS-135 commander, will in his new role at Boeing not lose sight of that.

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 3227
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 09-08-2013 10:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Have learned through some local governmental officials that a dry lake bed here in our county not to far from where I reside (the Wilcox Playa) is being seriously considered by NASA and Boeing as a recovery location for the CST-100.

Inquiries have gone out to the hospital, law enforcement and public safety agencies to determine what level of organic support can be provided and what will need to be brought in by stakeholders. 2017 was cited as when ops will commence at the Playa.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 29892
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 06-30-2014 04:09 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Boeing video release
Boeing Unveils America's First Space Taxi, Unlocks Possibilities for Future

Imagine flying in America's first space taxi, seeing Earth fade into the distance. Boeing is revolutionizing space travel and is one step closer to making it possible for you to experience previously what only astronauts could: space travel.

See more Boeing innovations at buildingsomethingbetter.com.

SkyMan1958
Member

Posts: 459
From: CA.
Registered: Jan 2011

posted 06-30-2014 10:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SkyMan1958   Click Here to Email SkyMan1958     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
One little detail, they need some Russian rocket engines for the pictured launch vehicle...

Jim Behling
Member

Posts: 691
From: Cape Canaveral, FL
Registered: Mar 2010

posted 06-30-2014 11:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jim Behling   Click Here to Email Jim Behling     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by onesmallstep:
...safety, above all, should be paramount in both vehicles, no?
No. If you want to be safe, then don't go. There is a risk cost trade.

Here is a better mantra. Mission first, safety always.

onesmallstep
Member

Posts: 716
From: Staten Island, New York USA
Registered: Nov 2007

posted 07-01-2014 09:57 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for onesmallstep   Click Here to Email onesmallstep     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
True enough, but as in the case of Challenger, Columbia and some aviation disasters, schedules, internal pressures and a rigid mindset came at the expense of safety. A company's 'culture' can be as important as the components it builds.

No risk can be entirely eliminated, and the best antidote is to design a vehicle the best way you can, keeping in mind that lives depend on it. I'm sure Chris Ferguson will have that on his mind when he takes command of the first manned flight of the CST-100 in a few years.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 1999-2014 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement