|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Boeing and Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne X-51
|
kr4mula Member Posts: 556 From: Cinci, OH Registered: Mar 2006
|
posted May 27, 2010 09:50 AM
The Air Force successfully flew its X-51A "Waverider" scramjet for the first time yesterday morning. It went around Mach 6 and flew for 200 seconds, or about 17 times longer than the X-43A, and more than all other scramjet flight times combined. Truly historic! What does this have to do with spaceflight? If the Air Force gets scramjets practical, expect to see them for spacelift (NASP is back!) in the future. Here is the Air Force press release on the flight. X-51 Waverider makes historic hypersonic flightAn X-51A Waverider flight-test vehicle successfully made the longest supersonic combustion ramjet-powered hypersonic flight May 26 off the southern California Pacific coast.  Credit: U.S. Air Force photo/Mike CassidyThe more than 200 second burn by the X-51's Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne-built air breathing scramjet engine accelerated the vehicle to Mach 5. The previous longest scramjet burn in a flight test was 12 seconds in a NASA X-43. Air Force officials called the test, the first of four planned, an unqualified success. The flight is considered the first use of a practical hydrocarbon fueled scramjet in flight. "We are ecstatic to have accomplished most of our test points on the X-51A's very first hypersonic mission," said Charlie Brink, a X-51A program manager with the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. "We equate this leap in engine technology as equivalent to the post-World War II jump from propeller-driven aircraft to jet engines." The X-51 launched at about 10 a.m. from here, carried under the left wing of an Air Force Flight Test Center B-52 Stratofortress. Then, flying at 50,000 feet over the Point Mugu Naval Air Warfare Center Sea Range, it was released. Four seconds later an Army Tactical Missile solid rocket booster accelerated the X-51 to about Mach 4.8 mach before it and a connecting interstage were jettisoned. The launch and separation were normal, Mr. Brink said. Four X-51A cruisers have been built for the Air Force and the DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) by industry partners Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne and Boeing. Air Force officials intend to fly the three remaining X-51A flight test vehicles this fall, Mr. Brink said. Air Force officials currently plan to fly each on virtually identical flight profiles, building knowledge from each successive flight. Hypersonic flight, normally defined as beginning at Mach 5, five times speed of sound, presents unique technical challenges with heat and pressure, which make conventional turbine engines impractical. Program officials said producing thrust with a scramjet has been compared to lighting a match in a hurricane and keeping it burning. "This first flight was the culmination of a six-year effort by a small, but very talented AFRL, DARPA and industry development team," Mr. Brink said. "Now we will go back and really scrutinize our data. No test is perfect, and I'm sure we will find anomalies that we will need to address before the next flight. But anyone will tell you that we learn just as much, if not more, when we encounter a glitch." Mr. Brink noted while development of the X-51A's engine and the test program are complex, controlling costs has been a key objective. The team has incorporated or adapted existing proven technologies and elected from the outset not to build recovery systems in the flight test vehicles, in an effort to control costs and focus funding on the vehicle's fuel-cooled scramjet engine. Mr. Brink said he believes the X-51A program will provide knowledge required to develop the game changing technologies needed for future access to space and hypersonic weapon applications. |
kr4mula Member Posts: 556 From: Cinci, OH Registered: Mar 2006
|
posted May 27, 2010 12:52 PM
I'd like to emphasize that this program originated with and was run/managed by the Air Force Research Laboratory, which contracted out the engine to Rocketdyne and the airframe to Boeing, though both pieces owed their concept and architecture to legacy AFRL programs as far back as NASP.
|
garymilgrom Member Posts: 1295 From: Atlanta, GA, USA Registered: Feb 2007
|
posted May 27, 2010 01:31 PM
Is the scramjet engine visible in the photo of the X51? |
mikej Member Posts: 322 From: Germantown, WI USA Registered: Jan 2004
|
posted May 27, 2010 01:41 PM
Even in the high-res version of the photo at the linked article, it's hard to discern the engine. There's a slide show which provides somewhat better views and also provides a better sense of scale. |
kr4mula Member Posts: 556 From: Cinci, OH Registered: Mar 2006
|
posted May 28, 2010 10:39 AM
There are also a few YouTube videos that show some flight prep (including earlier captive flights), the launch, etc. Just search for X-51. Those have some better views of it. |
fredtrav Member Posts: 729 From: Birmingham AL USA Registered: Aug 2010
|
posted August 14, 2012 01:42 PM
From the Washington Post, they are testing the X-51A today.
|
SpaceAholic Member Posts: 2791 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted August 14, 2012 04:05 PM
Nothing like having a futuristic capability being launched by a 50 year old airframe |
Gonzo Member Posts: 166 From: Battle Creek, MI, USA Registered: Mar 2012
|
posted August 15, 2012 05:55 AM
They did launch again yesterday afternoon. Another successful launch reaching mach 6+. |
gliderpilotuk Member Posts: 2865 From: London, UK Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted August 15, 2012 10:39 AM
My understanding was that the X-51 was a key potential component behind "Prompt Global Strike" - a system that to deliver a precision (non-nuclear) strike anywhere in the world within one hour. As such, its potential contribution to spaceflight is peripheral, if not disingenuous, even assuming the technology works.I can only imagine the uproar if the Chinese were developing such technology. |
kr4mula Member Posts: 556 From: Cinci, OH Registered: Mar 2006
|
posted August 15, 2012 11:35 AM
quote: Originally posted by gliderpilotuk: As such, its potential contribution to spaceflight is peripheral, if not disingenuous, even assuming the technology works.
While it's true that the X-51A has more direct application to a weapons system and this specific engine is too small for spacelift, the technology and knowledge of making the first really workable scramjet opens the door for a 2-stage reusable booster. While it's not as easy as just scaling the engine up 5 or 10 times to make a booster stage, at least the groundwork will be done. |
SpaceAholic Member Posts: 2791 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted August 15, 2012 11:44 AM
quote: Originally posted by gliderpilotuk: As such, its potential contribution to spaceflight is peripheral, if not disingenuous, even assuming the technology works.
There is nothing disingenuous... the DOD has always indicated the program is to support dual use application. The Chinese have been working an analogous capability for a number of years. |
yeknom-ecaps Member Posts: 417 From: Northville MI USA Registered: Aug 2005
|
posted August 15, 2012 06:24 PM
quote: Originally posted by Gonzo: They did launch again yesterday afternoon. Another successful launch reaching mach 6+.
Not sure where you got your information but .... CNN: A hypersonic aircraft launched by the Air Force Tuesday (Aug 14) spiraled out of control and was destroyed before it could reach its goal of speeding to 4,600 mph, Pentagon officials said Wednesday. The third test of the X-51A Waverider was launched Tuesday off the California coast from a B-52 modified bomber aircraft and was to fly for 300 seconds, reaching hypersonic speeds of Mach 6, but only flew for 16 seconds, according to the Air Force. LA Times: A closely watched test flight of an experimental aircraft designed to travel up to 3,600 mph ended in disappointment when a part failed, causing it to plummet into the Pacific Ocean, the Air Force revealed. The unmanned X-51A WaveRider was launched over the Pacific Tuesday from above the Point Mugu Naval Air Test Range in a key test to fine-tune its hypersonic scramjet engine. The aircraft was designed to hit mach 6, or six times the speed of sound, and fly for five minutes. But that didn’t happen. The engine never even lit. About 15 seconds into the flight, a fault was identified in one of the WaveRider's control fins, and the aircraft was not able to maintain control and was lost. | |
Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts
Copyright 1999-2012 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.

Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a
|
|
|
advertisement
|