Author
|
Topic: STS-61N (canceled mission) crew assignment
|
RichieB16 Member Posts: 552 From: Oregon Registered: Feb 2003
|
posted 07-07-2017 08:36 AM
I have been reading about some of the space shuttle missions cancelled following the loss of STS-51L and I have a question concerning a DOD mission scheduled for September 1986.I am seeing different crew listings for the mission on different sites. The NASA astronaut crew is consistent (Brewster Shaw, Mike McCulley, David Leestma, Jim Adamson, Mark Brown) and they also include MSE Frank Casserno. However, I have also seen Lawrence Skantze assigned to the mission (but only on Wikipedia). Was Skantze ever actually assigned to this flight? |
328KF Member Posts: 1234 From: Registered: Apr 2008
|
posted 07-07-2017 10:06 AM
I interviewed Gen. Casserino at length for our upcoming book on the payload specialist program. He was indeed assigned to the 61-N payload and was getting ready to move to Houston for full-time training when the accident occurred. I also came across the Skantze reference long after I spoke with Casserino, but never found any indication that he was actually assigned to the crew. He never mentioned it during the course of our discussions. A precedent had been set, though, with the assignment of Pete Aldridge to 62-A, and there were certainly others jockeying for a shuttle seat in those days, so it can't be ruled out entirely. |
Hart Sastrowardoyo Member Posts: 3445 From: Toms River, NJ Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 07-07-2017 10:40 AM
Could it be that both had been in consideration for 61N, given that the usual practice was to fly with a crew of seven? |
328KF Member Posts: 1234 From: Registered: Apr 2008
|
posted 07-07-2017 11:19 AM
Casserino certainly was not in consideration... he was assigned to the mission by the Special Projects Office of the Air Force. He and Daryll Joseph had been paired since the payload was originally to be deployed on STS-15, I believe. The IUS failure on STS-6 delayed that payload launch until 61-N which was scheduled to fly in September of 1986. Now Sec. Aldridge got his seat on 62-A at the expense of Randy Odle, who was originally assigned with Brett Watterson for the multi-payload mission. Only Casserino was assigned to fly 61-N on what was to be another "plain vanilla" deployment mission. So there may have been a seat available for a "dignitary" like Skantze, and he could have been brought in later in the year for the standard short payload specialist training curriculum. It may be that he was considered for the flight, but after Challenger the idea never got to the formal offer stage. |
RichieB16 Member Posts: 552 From: Oregon Registered: Feb 2003
|
posted 07-07-2017 10:15 PM
Okay, then it sounds like the consensus is that the crew (at the time of the mission cancellation) was: - CDR: Brewster Shaw
- Pilot: Michael McCulley
- MS: David Leestma
- MS: James Adamson
- MS: Mark Brown
- MSE: Frank Casserino
- Backup MSE: Daryl Joseph
That perhaps there was some discussion for Skantze to possibly join the crew is possible, but nothing became official prior to the suspensions of flights following 51L. Is that a fair thing to say?Also, one additional question: The majority of the NASA crew flew this mission as STS-29, the one exception being Michael McCulley was replaced by Richard Richards. From what I have read, a lot of the crews kept together and flying on later missions were kept together unless someone retired or changed jobs. McCulley seems to be one of the exceptions to this. He remained on active flight status but was not assigned to STS-29 with the rest of the 61N crew. He was instead assigned to STS-34, which ended up being the very next mission. Why assign him to 61N as pilot only to reassign him to pilot a different mission away from the rest of that crew? |
astro-nut Member Posts: 946 From: Washington, IL Registered: Jan 2006
|
posted 07-08-2017 11:01 AM
Dick Richards was reassigned following the 51L tragedy. He was scheduled to fly on the 61E/Astro-1 mission. Maybe they (NASA) wanted to get him flown as soon as possible and STS-28 was the earliest flight available for him? Considering that he was the last pilot of his class to fly and that Mike McCulley was the first pilot from his class to fly? I also remember reading that John Young was very impressed with Mike McCulley flying the Shuttle Training Aircraft that he wanted to get him assigned as quick as possible to a flight. I hope this might help? |
328KF Member Posts: 1234 From: Registered: Apr 2008
|
posted 07-08-2017 01:19 PM
quote: Originally posted by RichieB16: there was some discussion for Skantze to possibly join the crew is possible, but nothing became official prior to the suspensions of flights following 51L. Is that a fair thing to say?
That's the best I can guess given the limits of our research. We didn't have a lot of words/pages to spend on canceled PS missions (although there are some of note that we cover in the book).As for the Richards/McCulley swap, Richards makes no mention of how he came to be on the crew in his oral history. He does mention training with Scobee in the sims for awhile and Mike Smith training with Crippen for 62A, but suddenly Smith and Scobee were paired and he was moved off. So there was a lot of movement in those days. McCulley did not participate in a NASA interview, so no perspective from him. |
Michael Cassutt Member Posts: 358 From: Studio City CA USA Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted 07-10-2017 12:27 PM
A couple of things about this thread, which deals with a subject I know fairly well, having interviewed Joseph and Casserino several times 25+ years back... and also Dan Brandenstein in 2008.Casserino was definitely the prime PS/MSE for this mission when it was 61-N, Joseph was backup. Post-Challenger NASA and Air Force space (Space Division and Special Projects) chose to eliminate PS assignments for the most part. One of the MSEs said that while this debate was going on, Brewster Shaw weighed in: "I like Frank [Casserino], but if he's on the mission, I can't guarantee that he'll get out of the mid-deck." A hint, surely, that he wasn't in favor of a PS. Skantze as a military VIP PS ala Aldridge — that was definitely under discussion pre-Challenger, but then went away. I may have been the original source for those early reports, anyway, and wish to correct at least one 30-year-old error: had he flown, it would almost surely NOT have been on 62-B or 61-N or ANY Special Projects/NRO mission. Skantze was head of Systems Command, parent org of Space Division... he would have flown with, say, a DSP payload. Finally, regarding McCulley out and Richards in, Brandenstein said it was just a case of getting senior people — "astronauts who had been waiting nine years for a flight" — into space ahead of those who had come along in 1984. |
RichieB16 Member Posts: 552 From: Oregon Registered: Feb 2003
|
posted 07-10-2017 10:04 PM
Michael, thank you for that very thorough response. That really summed up the information I was looking for.I guess it makes sense for Richards vs. McCulley. He had simply been waiting longer. I suppose when the return to flight missions were manifested originally, they were done in order. This would have given Richards a flight six missions before McCulley. As it turned out that was not to be. I assume due to payload delays and other issues, STS-29 moved back a little and STS-34 moved up. The end result, they were flown back to back two months apart. Could you elaborate a little more on the DoD payload groupings? You said that Skantze would not have flown on a Special Projects/NRO mission but rather a DSP mission. I'm not sure what that really means. I'd like to learn as much as I can (as much as is available) about the differences in these missions. |
Michael Cassutt Member Posts: 358 From: Studio City CA USA Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted 07-11-2017 02:09 PM
Richie, regarding Skantze as a VIP PS, when I first heard this info circa 1985 NRO was still classified and its relationship with Air Force Special Projects unclear, at least to me. I did have an amusing exchange with a Space Division public affairs officer about interviewing Gary Payton and Bill Pailes -- Shuttle PS and MSEs.Pailes was fine, and I met with him, but Payton... "He's a spook," I was told. So no. That is, there was a wall between the "white" Air Force Space Division and the "black" SP/NRO element. In 1985, Aldridge was not only Sec AF but also Director NRO. So he could fly on any mission (and the 62-A TEAL RUBY payload began as a Special Project, I believe). But Skantze, head of Systems Command and its Space Division unit, would surely not have had any authority over ORION, QUASAR or ONYX-LACROS payloads and thus no real reason to observe them in flight. He would, however, have had a reason to take part in deployment of DSCS, DSP, GPS and other Space Division satellites. I only used DSP because it was on the manifest for fall 1986, with MSE Charles Jones as one PS. |
RichieB16 Member Posts: 552 From: Oregon Registered: Feb 2003
|
posted 07-11-2017 04:56 PM
OK, that makes sense. Thanks!!! |
Tom Member Posts: 1597 From: New York Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 07-11-2017 08:24 PM
Michael, as long as we're on the topic of military shuttle flights, it's pretty well known that the payloads for Payton's 51C flight in 1985 was similar to the payload on STS-33 in 1989. Is there a reason why the crew on the '85 flight were strictly military whereas the '89 mission had civilians? |
Michael Cassutt Member Posts: 358 From: Studio City CA USA Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted 07-11-2017 08:49 PM
Evolving policy -- Special Projects apparently wanted NASA to only assign active duty military officers to crews that would fly with NRO payloads. I don't believe that NASA (George Abbey, John Young) accepted this, though they apparently accommodated Special Projects for what was originally STS-10, later 51-C, and for 51-J, which was Space Division, not Special Projects/NRO.But NASA always insisted that its civilian astronauts should have the opportunity to fly "DOD-dedicated" missions, since they were all eligible for the appropriate security clearances, and beginning with STS-33 many did. |