|
|
Author
|
Topic: Alternate history: Early shuttle crews
|
RichieB16 Member Posts: 552 From: Oregon Registered: Feb 2003
|
posted 08-06-2008 12:14 AM
OK, here is a "what if" scenario for you guys.Let's say, back in the spring of 1970, Apollo 13 backup LMP Charlie Duke had never been exposed to German Measles (I know we have had this what if before...but hear me out). As a result, no change to the A13 prime crew was made and it flew as Lovell/Mattingly/Haise. A13 still returns to Earth safely. Now, the backup crew of A13 becomes the prime crew for Apollo 16 but it's Young/Swigert/Duke. While in training for A16, the Apollo 15 mission flies and has is successful. However, Jack Swigert is so busy training to be Apollo 16's CMP that he never gets involved Apollo 15 First Day Cover Scandal. Swigert flies as CMP during A16 and is assigned as the CMP for the ASTP mission (rather than Vance Brand) along with Tom Stafford. Swigert retires shortly thereafter. Now, the space shuttle program rolls around. Ken Mattingly decides to stick around (despite his only spaceflight being the miserable A13) and is poised to command shuttle flights. The only major difference in the astronaut corps is that Vance Brand has no space flight experience when the shuttle program beings. Now, my "what if" question. How does Jack Swigert serving on ASTP alter the crews for the first few shuttle missions? Specifically, STS-1 through STS-5 (if at all)? |
robsouth Member Posts: 769 From: West Midlands, UK Registered: Jun 2005
|
posted 08-06-2008 04:05 AM
Would Swigert have been considered for ASTP if he had been on Apollo 16? Would Swigert have wanted to hang around if he had been to the moon? And anyway Slayton, in his final act as crew selector, made the recommendation to Kraft of Slayton Swigert Brand for the crew of ASTP around March 1972 about a month before Apollo 16 flew. If Swigert had been on the Apollo 16 prime crew he wouldn't have been available for the ASTP crew selection. There were also quite a few other astronauts that put themselves forward for ASTP so Slayton and Stafford had no shortage of guys to choose from. |
Delta7 Member Posts: 1505 From: Bluffton IN USA Registered: Oct 2007
|
posted 08-06-2008 09:32 AM
I'm thinking that Stu Roosa might very well have been selected as ASTP CMP under that scenario, with Young/Swigert/Duke serving as backups for Apollo 17 (after flying Apollo 16). Brand might still have commanded an early Shuttle flight without the benefit of any prior space flight experience, but if not he then likely would have been paired with Young as STS-1 Pilot, IMO. Swigert may or may not have stayed around to fly the Shuttle as CDR, but I'm guessing with a successful lunar mission (and trans-lunar EVA) under his belt he would have left to pursue other interests. HAD he stayed, assuming his cancer would still have occurred in 1982, one could speculate on the impact it would have had on whatever flight assignment he might have had at the time.As for Mattingly, I'm sure Slayton would have been determined to give him another flight ASAP. It's possible he could have commanded a Skylab mission, or been given the ASTP CMP slot. I don't see him bumping anyone from the remaining Apollo missions, however. He might still have elected to concentrate on the nascent Space Shuttle program and be in line for one of the first missions. |
RichieB16 Member Posts: 552 From: Oregon Registered: Feb 2003
|
posted 08-06-2008 10:30 AM
I had thought about Swigert not being available for ASTP about 30 seconds after I hit the post button and I didn't go back and edit my post (because I wanted to go to bed).I know that Slayton had picked Swigert for ASTP following A13...so I would suppose that Mattingly might have gotten that assignment if he had flown on A13. Or, just assume that Swigert flew on A13 and hadn't gotten involved in the Apollo 15 scandal and was assigned to ASTP. Anyway, my point was...what if Brand wasn't on the ASTP crew. How would that have affected the shuttle crew lineups? |
webhamster Member Posts: 106 From: Ottawa, Canada Registered: Jul 2008
|
posted 08-06-2008 03:11 PM
quote: Originally posted by RichieB16: Anyway, my point was...what if Brand wasn't on the ASTP crew. How would that have affected the shuttle crew lineups?
I don't think it would have changed all that much. Assuming the ban on rookie commanders after STS-2 was still in place I think that Brand would probably have been assigned to the PLT seat on STS-5 with Weitz commanding (moving up from STS-6 where he actually flew as CDR). After that, I suspect it it would probably just "bump up" the order of early CDR's... Crippen gets 6 instead of 7, Truly gets 7 instead of 8, Young gets 8 instead of 9. I think Brand would probably then get the CDR slot on STS-9 or maybe keep his actual assignment as CDR on STS-41-B which means someone has to slot in to the missing flight...probably Hartsfield or Fullerton gets STS-9 in that case. Similarly, PLT seats probably slip one notch...Overmyer goes from 5 to 6, Bobko goes from 6 to 7, Hauck goes from 7 to 8, etc. In the end, I don't think much really changes. |
John Charles Member Posts: 339 From: Houston, Texas, USA Registered: Jun 2004
|
posted 08-06-2008 09:15 PM
quote: Originally posted by webhamster: ...After that, I suspect it it would probably just "bump up" the order of early CDR's... Crippen gets 6 instead of 7, Truly gets 7 instead of 8, Young gets 8 instead of 9. I think Brand would probably then get the CDR slot on STS-9 or maybe keep his actual assignment as CDR on STS-41-B...
All may well have gone as you supposed, except I don't think Young was in the rotation for just any old flight. STS-9 was Spacelab-1, a prestigious mission with major international participation whose high visibility required an experienced CDR in the run-up, if not the execution. Young, as chief astronaut, assigned crews to flights, and assigned himself to STS-9 on purpose. ------------------ John Charles Houston, Texas |
webhamster Member Posts: 106 From: Ottawa, Canada Registered: Jul 2008
|
posted 08-06-2008 11:53 PM
quote: Originally posted by John Charles: All may well have gone as you supposed, except I don't think Young was in the rotation for just any old flight. STS-9 was Spacelab-1, a prestigious mission with major international participation whose high visibility required an experienced CDR in the run-up, if not the execution. Young, as chief astronaut, assigned crews to flights, and assigned himself to STS-9 on purpose.
Good point, I had forgotten about the "prestige" of STS-9, so then that would leave STS-8 open for another "experienced" CDR. So who would be available at that point in time? - Engle - Fullerton - Mattingly - Hartsfield But then, I'm not sure what was going on with the first three. There must be a reason why they didn't get their second shuttle commands until 1985. Were they off doing something else? I doubt Brand recycles from PLT on STS-5 to CDR of STS-8 so quickly, but I suppose it would be possible since there's a 10 month span between the two flights. But, probably Hartsfield gets it. |
Hart Sastrowardoyo Member Posts: 3445 From: Toms River, NJ Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 08-07-2008 10:20 PM
May help, may not help, but FWIW:Mattingly was training for STS-10, which through various incarnations finally launched as Mission 51C. So he would be out for STS-8 CDR. Hartsfield is in training for STS-12 (later, through various incarnations finally launched as the "new" Mission 41D.) So he would be out as STS-8 CDR. One of the stories I've heard is that the Mission 51I patch (Engle's second mission) has 19 stars because it was to have launched as STS-19 (similar to how Mission 41G has 17 stars because it was originally STS-17.) Urban legend or not? | |
Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts
Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.

Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a
|
|
|
advertisement
|