Author
|
Topic: Apollo spacecraft modifications for Skylab
|
strangelove New Member Posts: 3 From: Sunrise, FL. USA Registered: Jun 2017
|
posted 09-25-2020 09:56 AM
I've read that the Apollo spacecraft was modified in order to remain docked to Skylab for an extended period. How exactly was it modified? As I understand it, the Skylab CSM only had two fuel cells instead of three and when it was docked it was partially powered down and shared the remainder of the load with the workshop.Since the fuel cells can't be shut down in space did they just continue using hydrogen and oxygen to power the systems for the duration of the mission? And since the load was being shared did that end up being a negligible amount of consumables being used? |
Fra Mauro Member Posts: 1681 From: Bethpage, N.Y. Registered: Jul 2002
|
posted 09-26-2020 02:48 PM
I’m not a technical person but a few of the modifications were removal of the high-gain antenna, umbilicals for power transfer, different storage lockers and a different thermal coating for the CM to deal with the temperature variations in earth orbit. |
Andy Anderson Member Posts: 90 From: Perth, Australia Registered: Dec 2009
|
posted 09-26-2020 08:43 PM
The following was copied from the "Skylab Spacecraft News Reference: Command and Service Modules": CSM ModificationsFor Skylab, the command and service module will be called upon to transport a three-man crew and up to 1,150 pounds of stowed equipment to and from the workshop. In addition, it will: - Serve as primary communications and command station for the orbital assembly
- Provide +X translation for orbital maintenance of cluster to assure repeatable ground track for EREP experiments.
- Provide attitude control of the cluster if required
- Support experiment activities
- Provide minimal electrical and thermal control systems during the entire stay in orbit
- Be capable of being reactivated after being in a semidormant state in space for 56 days
Since these requirements differ substantially from the requirements of the Apollo program for which the command and service modules were built, a number of modifications were required. The major changes include: Additions - A power transfer umbilical was added to the command module to link it with the power system of the orbital workshop.
- An atmosphere interchanging duct was added to the CM so it can be supplied with oxygen from the workshop.
- An intravehicular activity station and a 45-foot intravehicular umbilical were added to the CM to enable an astronaut to go into the orbital work-shop if it becomes depressurized.
- In the service module, a water storage tank was added to store excess water produced by the fuel cells after the CSM docks with Skylab 1. At this point, the water is an unwanted byproduct of the fuel cells, and is stored rather than dumped overboard to avoid the possibility of ice crystals forming on the windows and telescope lenses, and possible thrust forces on the workshop caused by water dumps.
- In the command module, the pyrotechnic batteries were replaced by two larger descent-type batteries for additional energy storage capability.
- A 40-channel inhibit function and a 10-channel memory unit were added to the CM caution and warning system; a CSM/workshop interface unit was added to present a master alarm lamp in the workshop.
- A descent battery pack (three 500 A-H batteries) was added to the service module because the fuel cells will not be in operation during the descent from orbit.
- A propellant storage module holding about 1,500 pounds of RCS propellants was added to the service module. This allows the RCS system to be used as a backup for attitude control of the orbital cluster, and as a backup to the service propulsion system for deorbit of the CSM.
- Heaters were added to the service propulsion system and its propellant supply, and to the service module reaction control system and its propellant supply, to prevent freezing of propellants, lines, and valves.
- A shelf and coolant line for Experiments S071 and S072 were added to the service module.
- A rescue capability kit has been developed for the Skylab program, but will not be installed in the CM unless the need for a rescue mission arises.
- In the spacecraft-lunar module adapter, a light weight truss has been added as a stabilizing device to take the place of the lunar module, which was mounted so as to have a stabilizing action on the adapter.
Deletions - One fuel cell was removed from the service module because the requirement for fuel cell power is short-lived. The fuel cells will be used to provide power for the CSM after it docks at the MDA and cryogens are depleted. After that, CSM power requirements will be supplied by the workshop electrical system, and the CSM batteries will provide power for the return to earth.
- One helium pressurization tank and two SPS fuel and oxidizer storage tanks were removed from the service module because the mission requires far less use of the SPS engine than a lunar mission.
- The high-gain antenna was deleted from the service module because there are no requirements for communications from deep space in the Skylab program.
- Provisions for waste stowage and some food stowage were deleted from the CSM to make room for Skylab experiments.
The two power cells were expected to provide spacecraft power for approximately the first 14 days after docking until H2 depletion and then were shut down.The CSM was then powered by the OWS through an umbilical.
|
strangelove New Member Posts: 3 From: Sunrise, FL. USA Registered: Jun 2017
|
posted 09-27-2020 08:25 PM
Thank you for posting that. Fascinating! |
SpaceAholic Member Posts: 4646 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 09-27-2020 09:16 PM
No BBQ roll, to mitigate the CM and outboard side of the SM RCS Quad panels (like the one shown below from SM115A — a clue that it was initially prepped to support the Skylab program) had a white high emissivity coating. Excuse the 50 years of dirt in the color reference shot, will get cleaned eventually. 
|
Robsch New Member Posts: 2 From: Registered: Feb 2018
|
posted 09-28-2020 02:48 PM
Was the SPS only used to de-orbit? Seems like a bit of a waste for such a big engine. |
SpaceAholic Member Posts: 4646 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 09-28-2020 04:16 PM
Bet your perspective would change if a Mode III launch abort was necessary. |
Space Cadet Carl Member Posts: 243 From: Lake Orion, Michigan Registered: Feb 2006
|
posted 09-29-2020 09:08 AM
Can anyone comment on the decision to use white paint on the Skylab CMs instead of the reflective silver mylar used on the lunar CMs? Did it have to do with the lack of barbeque mode? |
Mike Dixon Member Posts: 1475 From: Kew, Victoria, Australia Registered: May 2003
|
posted 09-29-2020 09:10 AM
As far as I know, a definite yes. |
Robsch New Member Posts: 2 From: Registered: Feb 2018
|
posted 09-29-2020 10:05 AM
My perspective changed indeed. I had no idea those abort modes that used the SPS existed at all. Interesting stuff! |