Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Mercury - Gemini - Apollo
  Post-flight processing of Apollo imagery

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Post-flight processing of Apollo imagery
holcombeyates
Member

Posts: 253
From: UK
Registered: Dec 2010

posted 10-18-2019 05:36 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for holcombeyates   Click Here to Email holcombeyates     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I am researching the story of what happened to the Apollo 70mm Hasselblad images — by that I mean how were they processed and developed back on Earth. Given that they were priceless images and irreplaceable there must have been special procedures and systems for minimizing the risk.

I have looked at the KODAK website for example but have not found anything. (I am reminded of all the lost images taken on Omaha beach 0n 6th June 1944 (out of 106 only 11 survive as tragically, they were destroyed during subsequent processing).

Also the Apollo film was stored in a protective vault in the command module to prevent damage from solar radiation)? Can anyone provide any more info or leads?

I would love to interview, or read interviews of anyone that may have been part of the image processing teams during Apollo. Any info would be great.

Headshot
Member

Posts: 891
From: Vancouver, WA, USA
Registered: Feb 2012

posted 10-18-2019 07:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Headshot   Click Here to Email Headshot     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
As I recall, NASA purchased film processing equipment from Kodak. So film processing was under NASA control and was NASA's responsibility. Chapter 4 of NASA SP-201, Analysis of Apollo 8 Photography and Visual Observation, gives some information about processing the film used in Apollo 8's on-board Hasselblad cameras.

holcombeyates
Member

Posts: 253
From: UK
Registered: Dec 2010

posted 10-20-2019 07:12 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for holcombeyates   Click Here to Email holcombeyates     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Many thanks, that is a good start and I can follow up on the references in that document.

rjurek349
Member

Posts: 1193
From: Northwest Indiana
Registered: Jan 2002

posted 10-20-2019 08:39 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rjurek349   Click Here to Email rjurek349     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Here you go, the oral history from Richard Underwood. All a great read, but page 22 starts talking about the careful processing of the images. He did it by hand, rather than machine, to control and prevent damage; despite people pushing him to use the quicker "automatic" methods, which would have risked damage.

chet
Member

Posts: 1506
From: Beverly Hills, Calif.
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 10-20-2019 03:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for chet   Click Here to Email chet     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Reading Dick Underwood's interview was great, lots of interesting stories about (the evolution of) space photography. Thanks for posting the link, Richard.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement