Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Mercury - Gemini - Apollo
  Gemini 7: Mission duration vs. moon landings

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Gemini 7: Mission duration vs. moon landings
Tykeanaut
Member

Posts: 2216
From: Worcestershire, England, UK.
Registered: Apr 2008

posted 08-29-2011 05:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tykeanaut   Click Here to Email Tykeanaut     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I've always wondered why Frank Borman and Jim Lovell had to endure a 14-day mission in preparation for moon landings when the first one lasted 8 days and longest moon mission was only 12 days?

garymilgrom
Member

Posts: 1966
From: Atlanta, GA
Registered: Feb 2007

posted 08-29-2011 07:28 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for garymilgrom   Click Here to Email garymilgrom     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
One of the goals of the Gemini program was "long duration flights in excess of the requirements of a lunar landing mission". The 14 day orbital stay was a duration picked on its own, without respect to a lunar mission duration.

Source: National Space Science Data Center.

Max Q
Member

Posts: 399
From: Whyalla South Australia
Registered: Mar 2007

posted 08-29-2011 08:51 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Max Q   Click Here to Email Max Q     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I will always remember the line in Lovell's book "14 days in a men's room" made it sound so inviting... Not.

BBlatcher
Member

Posts: 57
From: Savannah, GA, USA
Registered: Aug 2011

posted 08-29-2011 10:25 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for BBlatcher     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Max Q:
I will always remember the line in Lovell's book "14 days in a men's room" made it sound so inviting... Not.
It wasn't as bad as Apollo 8, where Frank Borman was throwing up and had diarrhea in an enclosed, weightless space.

Fra Mauro
Member

Posts: 1624
From: Bethpage, N.Y.
Registered: Jul 2002

posted 08-29-2011 10:51 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Fra Mauro   Click Here to Email Fra Mauro     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I suppose just the way engineers test components beyond what they are expect to perform at, the doctors wanted to test a little beyond an extended Apollo mission.

bwhite1976
Member

Posts: 283
From: Belleville, IL
Registered: Jun 2011

posted 08-29-2011 11:09 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for bwhite1976   Click Here to Email bwhite1976     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Stand up next to a Gemini capsule on display at a museum and think how it would be to spend 14 days inside of one. As I recall, the medical doctors had a lot of crazy fears and concerns about those two at reentry and splashdown. That mission pretty much quieted the concern that man could spend an extended length of time in space and not perish or have ill effects upon return.

MCroft04
Member

Posts: 1647
From: Smithfield, Me, USA
Registered: Mar 2005

posted 08-30-2011 07:28 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for MCroft04   Click Here to Email MCroft04     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Every time I go to KSC I stop by and spend some time with the Gemini 9 capsule. You can get up close with it, and imagine how difficult it would have been to spend more than five minutes locked inside; two weeks seems unthinkable. It's also fun to retrace Geno's EVA and how difficult that must have been.

Max Q
Member

Posts: 399
From: Whyalla South Australia
Registered: Mar 2007

posted 08-31-2011 07:13 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Max Q   Click Here to Email Max Q     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by BBlatcher:
It wasn't as bad as Apollo 8, where Frank Borman was throwing up and had diarrhea in an enclosed, weightless space.
I remember reading of a training sim where the crew requested early and immediate deorbit and return. When the controllers said no, the response from the spacecraft was that it would be preferable to wait for rescue on Earth, at least everything would not be floating free round the cabin.

bwhite1976
Member

Posts: 283
From: Belleville, IL
Registered: Jun 2011

posted 08-31-2011 11:17 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for bwhite1976   Click Here to Email bwhite1976     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Max Q:
I remember reading of a training sim...
I believe that is from Schefter's "The Race" and involves Conrad and Cooper training for Gemini 5. I love that passage as well, in the training exercise Conrad has appendicitis, and Cooper, who is always cool and composed, replies to Mission Control with something like the "knobs are starting to get slippery." I can't imagine being in an Apollo CSM or Gemini capsule with that going on.

dtemple
Member

Posts: 730
From: Longview, Texas, USA
Registered: Apr 2000

posted 08-31-2011 09:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for dtemple   Click Here to Email dtemple     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I have long suspected the 14-day duration was in support of the USAF MOL program in which the Gemini spacecraft would be utilized for missions of that length. Perhaps there was some thought given to extended stays (such as could occur with a lunar base) on the moon. However, since an official record shows 14 days was chosen to prove a 7-10 day mission would be no problem if astronauts returned in good condition after two weeks in space then I guess that is the real reason for NASA's choice.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement