Posts: 572 From: Albuquerque, New Mexico Registered: Jan 2003
posted 10-22-2012 12:16 AM
What do you think of this. Autopens or not?
Posts: 1193 From: Birmingham AL USA Registered: Aug 2010
posted 10-22-2012 12:19 AM
Lovell and Anders at least are bad.
Posts: 1430 From: Beverly Hills, Calif. Registered: Nov 2000
posted 10-22-2012 01:31 AM
Beg to differ...I think the Lovell is likely good (and it's possible Anders was trying to "do a number" with a deliberately very atypical signature, though it's likely just bad).
Posts: 3292 From: London, UK Registered: Feb 2002
posted 10-22-2012 04:37 AM
The Anders is a shocker. I've never seen a shaky, pointy version like this, even when he's at his worst.
Steve Zarelli Member
Posts: 508 From: Upstate New York, USA Registered: Mar 2001
posted 10-22-2012 08:44 AM
All look okay except Anders in my opinion. Note how slowly and deliberately drawn it is. If he was going to be messy, my sense is he would dash off a lousy signature quickly... not take the time to slowly draw a malformed autograph.