Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Opinions & Advice
  Comparing space memorabilia auction houses

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Comparing space memorabilia auction houses
Non Sequitur
New Member

Posts:
From:
Registered:

posted 02-09-2012 11:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Non Sequitur   Click Here to Email Non Sequitur     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Posts on this board list the auctioneers with a focus on space items (Bonhams, Goldberg, Heritage, Regency, RR Auctions, Lunar Legacies), but there isn't much contrast drawn between them (perhaps nobody wants to offend an entity it may have to buy from, or sell with, in the future).

I have contacted one auctioneer from the above list ("Auctioneer X"), and am sufficiently confused to seek thoughts here. Since these thoughts would be of benefit to many readers besides myself, I hope it will generate some responses.

  1. I'm accustomed to a buyer's premium, but was shocked by the seller's premium (the existence, and particularly the quantum!). According to posts here, 10-25% seems par for the course, and negotiation seems possible, but is there any rule of thumb on where sufficient leverage exists to negotiate? If an item is worth $100, I'd assume not, but how about when the item reaches $500? $1000? Can you make a deal with an auctioneer up front that you'll pay a 20% premium if it sells under $500; 15% $500-1000; 10% over $1000, etc? A sliding scale seems sensible, but I've never seen the idea discussed.

  2. Auctioneer X expressed an opinion of authenticity - is that good enough? In what circumstances is an independent authentication worth paying for? Does it depend on where you choose to sell (i.e. it might be helpful on eBay - the wild west - but not at RR Auctions, who seem to authenticate and stand behind what they sell, which basically establishes provenance on its own)?

  3. If authentication is worthwhile, by whom? Seems like some (like baseball experts) are worthless, so who is worthwhile?

  4. In my searches on this board I saw one article auctioned by "X" that was resold shortly after at "Y" for almost double the price. This could be due to other factors like how well publicized the auction was, but I suspect it has a lot to do with the auctioneer's reputation. Is there any consensus on this? Anyone brave enough to rank auctioneers on reputation?

  5. Auctioneer X described my signatures as "modern, not classic" - is anyone familiar with this terminology? Seems a little fishy to me. Should I care?

    I'm happy to own a piece that a listed auctioneer is willing to describe as genuine, and who is responsive, but something just doesn't smell right.

gliderpilotuk
Member

Posts: 3398
From: London, UK
Registered: Feb 2002

posted 02-09-2012 12:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for gliderpilotuk   Click Here to Email gliderpilotuk     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sme good questions!

I have bought through all of them and sold through four of them. First of all I would exempt Lunar Legacies from this analysis. Correct me if I'm wrong, Donnis, but this is not an institutionalised business but a supplement to his website, from where he originally offered unquestionably sound collectibles.

  1. Yes, the auction house can make 40% from the two sides of a trade. Nice business, despite the overheads! In my experience, most of the houses are negotiable on bulk sales, or offer a sliding scale for higher value sales. RR's specialist space auction offers competitive discounted sales commissions, in particular. You just have to ask and offer a good selection of items for sale.

  2. Not necessarily! One recent auction house seemed to be offering CofA's issued by another (non-specialist) auction house as the only support! Some (Heritage, RR) employ knowledgeable collectors/specialists to evaluate authenticity. It's not foolproof for either buyer or seller, but offers a level of screening that gives a high degree of comfort. This doesn't "establish provenance on its own", as provenance is more like an audit trail of origination, than the expression of an educated opinion, but it's a lot more valuable than any eBay CofA!

  3. This has been discussed before. Try the Heritage or RR authenticators, or post a picture here. You'll get consensus from some knowledgeable people most of the time.

  4. Pass - happy to talk off-list!

  5. "modern, not classic" - not heard that one before and it depends on the context. You could describe an Armstrong from the early 60's as "classic" and one from the 90's as "modern", but it's not helpful and I wouldn't accept one of my items described thus. The buyer will assess whether they want a classic or modern and set the price accordingly; RR, for example, always provide precise descriptions as to quality of signature and medium - and there's no question that they have had the item authenticated.

SpaceSteve
Member

Posts: 428
From: San Antonio TX, USA
Registered: Apr 2004

posted 02-09-2012 02:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceSteve   Click Here to Email SpaceSteve     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
In response to #5:

I interpret this "Modern" vs "Classic" terminology to mean "was it signed during the person's "active career", or was it signed more recently?

For example, in baseball, Mickey Mantle's, Willie Mays' and Hank Aaron's signatures changed in appearance. Some people might be looking for a "period" autograph (when the player was active), as opposed to a more current one (where the player is retired and the signature is possibly "shakier".

I can't think of any astronauts off-hand who's autograph has changed as they've gotten older, with the exception of Neil Armstrong's two main styles. With him though, it appears his style changed more due to the increased demands for his signature, thereby causing him to adopt a shorter and quicker signature.

Steve Zarelli
Member

Posts: 731
From: Upstate New York, USA
Registered: Mar 2001

posted 02-09-2012 03:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Steve Zarelli   Click Here to Email Steve Zarelli     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I presume "modern vs classic" would include signature style, writing implement and the medium. For instance, "John H Glenn" in ballpoint on a vintage litho would be more desirable than a recently signed "John Glenn" in Sharpie on a repro glossy.

Classic, or "of the era," signatures from most fields typically command higher prices. A 1958 signed Mickey Mantle ball is worth way more than a mass produced show signed ball from 1990. The same with presidential material signed while president vs post presidential.

spaced out
Member

Posts: 3110
From: Paris, France
Registered: Aug 2003

posted 02-09-2012 04:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for spaced out   Click Here to Email spaced out     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If you're looking to consign you definitely need to look at the net you might expect to get taking into account the buyer and seller fees combined.

For it to be worthwhile you need the auction house to fetch a significantly higher price for an item than you could get yourself by selling direct here or on eBay (which of course has its own fees to take into consideration).

Auction house fees can look pretty off-putting but sometimes buyers are willing to spend much more at a big space auction than they would on eBay. In fact many people will only buy items at 'bargain' prices on eBay, often in the hope of turning a profit by reselling at a specialized auction.

The auction house will also handle the work involved in listing and item for sale and shipping it to the end buyer. It does allow you to send the items off and forget about it, which if you're looking to sell lots of items can save you an awful lot of hassle.

jemmy
Member

Posts: 176
From:
Registered: Dec 2010

posted 02-09-2012 05:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jemmy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I have made a decision never to buy from one of the above auction houses no matter how bad I want a item or how cheap it is. The reason for this was due to a purchase I made of a signed Apollo astronaut and regarding it authenticy.

This was the first time (and probably last time) I have purchased a item from any auction house. I was really uneducated and totally relied on the auction house regarding authenticity.

When I purchased the item I was 100% sure the item was genuine because of the professionalism of the company and it's catelog but after a couple of months when my eye became a small bit trained I released that maybe the signature needed a second opion. I contacted two very reliable persons in the space autograph business and they failed to give me a 100% authentication, both said could be genuine but again could be fake.

My soul got torn out as I paid over $550 for this item and to be told it probably was a fake.

I contacted the auction house and was basically told "don't want to know about it". I may as well have purchased from eBay, at least it might have been a lot cheaper.

So, returning to one of your points above about authenticity I would select a company that fully backs the item sold in evey way i.e. quality, authenticity and reliability. That's regarding the seller and buyer.

Non Sequitur
New Member

Posts:
From:
Registered:

posted 02-10-2012 01:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Non Sequitur   Click Here to Email Non Sequitur     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by gliderpilotuk:
This has been discussed before. Try the Heritage or RR authenticators, or post a picture here. You'll get consensus from some knowledgeable people most of the time.
This raises another interesting related point: if Auctioneer X is willing to declare it genuine, is there any value to contradicting him by posting here and opening oneself to doubt? Several concurring dissents here could (1) cast doubt on the item when ultimately consigned, and (2) create a moral/ethical obligation on me to disclose these newly-generated doubts should I choose to sell via eBay myself. That's the worst case.

The best case is unanimous praise of authenticity. What can I do with THAT? Post a link to the thread of praise within the eBay listing? I've seen some excellent (and free) analysis on this board, but submission seems to have more potential for risk than reward.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement