Author
|
Topic: gastampman eBay listings
|
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 10-26-2010 02:58 PM
I guess nearly everyone has been watching the multiple astronaut autograph auctions on eBay by gastampman.At the moment he's selling an impressive collection of signed covers from the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo eras including a mixture of Autopens and genuine signatures. The seller identifies many of these signatures as probable Autopens but obviously some people think he's mistaken and bid accordingly. In fact these signatures are challenging to judge for two reasons: 1) Early Autopen signatures are often executed using fountain pens, which results in quite natural-looking pen strokes with some variation in line width etc. When they later switched to sharpies Autopens were much easier to spot. 2) When Autopens were used on covers these often slipped around, resulting in significant displacements of parts of the Autopen signature. People often mistake these differences for evidence of natural signatures as they don't exactly match the known AP patterns. Today there were a few Grissom and Young signatures like this which I believe are all APs (as the seller suggested): three Grissom covers, two Young covers, and four Grissom/Young covers. Many of these signatures show some displacement of elements and slight differences in loops etc but I believe this is down to the covers moving under the pen. The seller has also been offering some superb hand signed covers, with many still active at the time of posting. |
fredtrav Member Posts: 1673 From: Birmingham AL Registered: Aug 2010
|
posted 10-26-2010 03:51 PM
I had wondered about the two John Young covers. They did not appear to match any autopen but were close. I bid on them but was not going to pay more than about $25 for the two as a gamble. I bought a Wally Schirra photo that was excellent and I bought some covers in an earlier auction that looked good but am still waiting to get them. Some of the stuff he sells looks like autopen and some is very good. |
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 10-26-2010 04:15 PM
The two Young covers are a classic case of signatures that are quite difficult to judge even with years of experience looking at Autopens.For me the key with these two signatures is not in the long strokes/loops which seem to be more suspectible to displacement but in the formation of the small letter sequences. In particular the "oun" and top loop of the "g" in Young in both signatures are absolutely identical in every detail and this just doesn't happen with people's natural signatures. Contrast these multiple Young and Grissom signatures that are so nearly identical with each other with a great set of three early Schirra signatures. Now here is an example of a person signing with the same basic signature. Even if this did vaguely resemble one of Schirra's Autopen patterns you wouldn't need to try to find tiny displacements of individual elements to see if they're Autopens or not, the natural variation in these genuine signatures is enormous - letters are different heights, loops of different sizes, lines at different angles, flourishes are of wildly different lengths and end in different ways. This is natural variation. Those Grissom and Young signatures (at least in my opinion) simply don't show it. |
fredtrav Member Posts: 1673 From: Birmingham AL Registered: Aug 2010
|
posted 10-26-2010 05:35 PM
I agree with you on the Yong signatures. The differences I was noticing was on the J and then the o which could just be movement of the template, however I have not seen the J ever shaped quite that way.On another note, I wonder how long it will be until these autopen signatures show up on E-Bay or another auction without the probable autopen disclaimer. I had bid on the other lots in question just to keep them off the market, but they got out of my range. |
Bob M Member Posts: 1745 From: Atlanta-area, GA USA Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 10-27-2010 02:08 PM
Here's my take on the signed covers by "gastampman" on eBay -Overall, it's a very impressive assortment of astronaut signed covers, with some autopens (the mentioned Grissoms, Grissoms/Youngs, and Youngs, plus Armstrong on a GT-8 cover, and a few Shepard secretarials, etc.), but the seller tried to identify his autopens, but also id'ed some genuine autographs as autopens. There are some really special signed covers listed, including a scarce GT-12 (Lovell/Aldrin) crew signed cover; a GT-7; an Apollo 9; four Apollo 10's in one lot (!); a bunch of authentic and early Schirras, Cunninghams, Lovells, Scotts, and Staffords; plus what look like to me as a number of authentic Wernher von Brauns. Those who collect astronaut signed covers should have a look at what "gastampman" has on eBay in my opinion. And I'd expect that there are a number of astronaut signed cover collectors just licking their chops over many of these covers. I'm sure watching a few. |
MarylandSpace Member Posts: 1336 From: Registered: Aug 2002
|
posted 10-28-2010 01:11 PM
Any opinions on the Gemini 6A cover I bought from gastampman with the 4 Mercury autographs?I thank you group. |
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 10-28-2010 04:00 PM
quote: Originally posted by MarylandSpace: Any opinions on the Gemini 6A cover I bought from gastampman with the 4 Mercury autographs?
All four signatures are perfect in my opinion. |
Russ Still Member Posts: 535 From: Atlanta, GA USA Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 10-28-2010 04:22 PM
I'm interested in his Slayton WSS.It looks kind of "Autopennish" to me, but doesn't seem to match any patterns I have. Anyone have any opinions on it? I tried to contact the seller, but he doesn't accept questions (which, in itself, bothers me).
|
Rick Mulheirn Member Posts: 4167 From: England Registered: Feb 2001
|
posted 10-28-2010 04:31 PM
Just scroll down Russ and click on "Ask a question". He responded to mine. |
Russ Still Member Posts: 535 From: Atlanta, GA USA Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 10-28-2010 04:35 PM
I tried the Ask a Question, but ebay says he cannot be contacted. |
fredtrav Member Posts: 1673 From: Birmingham AL Registered: Aug 2010
|
posted 10-28-2010 05:50 PM
I just tried the same. I had put in a bid on this photo this afternoon. I had won several items about a week and a half ago and then another about 5-6 days ago. Got the second batch won but the first hasn't arrived yet so I was going to ask about them, but E-Bay said seller couldn't be contacted. |
fredtrav Member Posts: 1673 From: Birmingham AL Registered: Aug 2010
|
posted 10-29-2010 02:02 PM
It must have been an E-Bay glitch as my message today was sent. |
fredtrav Member Posts: 1673 From: Birmingham AL Registered: Aug 2010
|
posted 10-29-2010 05:52 PM
He answered my question very promptly and we are working to resolve my situation. I have no problem bidding on his other items.
|
Ross Member Posts: 472 From: Australia Registered: Jul 2003
|
posted 10-30-2010 06:51 AM
While comments so far have concentrated on his Astronaut signatures, he also has an amazing collection of Recovery personnel signed covers. And they are selling for quite high prices. I've won a few but missed out on many more. One lot involved 9 Apollo 7 covers, most signed by Recovery personnel. It went for $205! |
spaceflori Member Posts: 1499 From: Germany Registered: May 2000
|
posted 10-30-2010 07:51 AM
That is my observation, too, recovery personnel signed covers sell for quiet a lot lately- several are selling for more than astronaut signed covers now!I would guess that are a much less such covers and those collectors who already have the astronaut signatures (not too hard to find) are now keen on finding those that helped the astronauts getting there. |
spaceman Member Posts: 1104 From: Walsall, West Midlands, UK Registered: Dec 2002
|
posted 10-30-2010 04:28 PM
How about the John Glenn items? |
albatron Member Posts: 2732 From: Stuart, Florida Registered: Jun 2000
|
posted 10-31-2010 08:39 AM
Be wary of the Richard Nixon signed Apollo 11 cover.It's a secretarial. |
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 11-04-2010 07:50 AM
One of the listings that's about to end - 140471309284 - features what appears to be a Grissom Autopen on an Apollo 11 cover. Has anyone seen this kind of thing before? |
Bob M Member Posts: 1745 From: Atlanta-area, GA USA Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 11-04-2010 07:57 AM
Interesting lineup: authentic, autopen, secretarialGlenn authentic Grissom autopen (the rarer type-2) Schirra secretarial "Gastampman" ID's them all as autopens |
capoetc Member Posts: 2169 From: McKinney TX (USA) Registered: Aug 2005
|
posted 11-04-2010 08:21 AM
quote: Originally posted by spaced out: One of the listings that's about to end features what appears to be a Grissom Autopen on an Apollo 11 cover. Has anyone seen this kind of thing before?
Very strange -- must have had the autopen on a blank cover and then added the cachet later??? I'm pretty sure it is impossible to get an autopen sig after an astronaut passes. |
fredtrav Member Posts: 1673 From: Birmingham AL Registered: Aug 2010
|
posted 11-04-2010 10:29 PM
He had an earlier one where the cachet was printed over part of the signature so that isw what must have been done. |
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 12-10-2010 07:44 AM
Some more interesting items from gastampman. As usual many of the items he identifies as possible Autopens are actually hand signed. I think we can safely assume that the multiple Irwin, Swigert and other covers he sold in the last few weeks are mostly going to come back to market one by one at a healthy markup in the near future.Anyway, two lots in particular caught my eye today. Early Mercury Seven signed covers frequently contain a lot of Autopenned signatures that can look deceptively natural due to the fine ink pens used at the time so it's always interesting to take a look at this kind of multi-signed cover. This time we have: Lot of 3 covers from Mercury Project 1962 & 1963: On the Mercury 7 signed cover, in my opinion the Glenn, Carpenter, Schirra and Slayton are hand signed. The Grissom and Cooper signatures appear to be Autopens. The Shepard is odd (more below). On the other covers the Grissoms appear hand signed, as does the Cooper. 2 Covers with the signatures of 7 astronauts: On both these covers in my opinion the Glenn, Carpenter, Schirra, Cooper and Slayton are hand signed. Both have Grissom Autopens. The Shepards are odd... What strikes me on all three of these Mercury Seven covers is the Shepard signatures. To me they look decidedly odd, quite unlike his normal flowing signature style and yet not like any Autopen or secretarial I've seen myself. They could be the result of a previously unknown Autopen pattern with some movement of the covers under the machine. Of note: - The "Alan" is identical in two and similar with some slippage in the other. All three have an odd loop at the lower right of the "A" that I've not noticed before in his signatures.
- The "B" is unusual but seems to follow the same pattern, with significant displacement in one case.
- The "S" one one example seems to misshapen in a way that is difficult to imagine coming from the pen of the astronaut or a secretary, as the whole lower loop seems to have gone.
- The rest of the surname in all three cases appears to follow an identical pattern, followed by a long comma to the lower right in all three.
- The final "Jr" is near identical in two examples apart from the length of the final stroke. The other example seems to have the same upper loop but the lower part slips to the right.
Maybe I'm reading too much into these and they're actually hand signed by Shepard or a secretary, but seeing these three signatures together certainly makes me wonder.What does everyone else make of these? |
yeknom-ecaps Member Posts: 660 From: Northville MI USA Registered: Aug 2005
|
posted 12-10-2010 01:48 PM
Has the original owner of these been identified? Quite an impressive collection. |
Bob M Member Posts: 1745 From: Atlanta-area, GA USA Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 12-11-2010 07:01 AM
quote: Originally posted by yeknom-ecaps: Has the original owner of these been identified? Quite an impressive collection.
Perhaps the seller would divulge the name of the collector/owner? It is an impressive and significant collection and I've also been wondering who this super-collector of the 1960's was, too. It's been enjoyable just checking everything out and waiting to see what will come up next! This has been a real bonanza for us space cover and signed cover collectors. |
gliderpilotuk Member Posts: 3398 From: London, UK Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 12-11-2010 08:20 AM
Chris, I don't like either of the Shepards you refer to above, nor 2 Covers from Mercury 3.Compare to this, signed (or at least, dated) just the day before (!): |
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 12-21-2010 09:21 AM
gastampman's latest listings contain some exceptional covers as before, including a couple of early Armstrong signatures, Ted Freeman, C.C. Williams, See, Bassett and more.As before there are sometimes single lots consisting of multiple covers with rare signatures, noted as 'may be Autopens' when in fact very few are. With apologies to those dealers hoping to pick up bagfuls of bargain signed covers for resale, here's my opinion of some of them: - 140492046903 : 2 John Young signed covers - top one hand signed, lower Autopen
- 350423852472 : Ted Freeeman signed cover - hand signed. GT3 cachet added later obviously.
- 350423853346 : Ed White signed cover - this is actually an Autopen
- 140492049598 : GT4 crew signed cover & White signed cover - both hand signed.
- 140492052102 : 2 x Ed White signed covers - both hand signed
- 350423901016 : GT4 cover - has a Shepard secretarial sig under cachet
- 140492117625 : GT5 cover with Oberth sig - hand signed
- 140492119538 : GT5 cover with Sehpard & Cooper sigs - Shepard is a secretarial, Cooper hand signed
- 350423946032 : GT6A signed covers - all hand signed (on 3 covers shown)
- 350423946387 : GT8 Scott signed cover - hand signed
- 140492163612 : Scott signed GT8 cover - hand signed
- 350423947035 : Armstrong signed GT8 cover - nice vintage signature
- 140492164322 : 2 x Scott signed GT8 covers - both hand signed
- 140492164773 : Bassett signed GT9 cover - hand signed with later cachet
- 350423948365 : See signed GT9 cover - hand signed with later cachet
- 350423948828 : Gemini 9 crew signed cover - hand signed
- 350423949325 : Bassett signed GT9 cover - hand signed with later cachet
- 140492167226 : 3 x Collins signed GT10 covers - all hand signed
- 350423950565 : See signed GT9 cover - hand signed with later cachet
- 350423951044 : Aldrin signed GT12 cover - hand signed
- 140492387207 : Oberth & Ley signed covers - hand signed
- 350424152583 : Eisele signed Apollo 7 cover - hand signed
- 350424153590 : Cunningham & Eisele signed cover - hand signed
- 350424154188 : Eisele signed Apollo 7 cover - hand signed
- 350424171278 : 3 x Anders signed Apollo 8 covers - all hand signed
- 140492413289 : 2 x Anders signed Apollo 8 covers - hand signed
- 350424172728 : Anders signed Apollo 8 cover - hand signed
- 350424173962 : Group 2 signed cover - hand signed by Lovell, Stafford, Borman, McDivitt, See, Armstrong, Young. Conrad Autopen. Missing White.
- 350424175254 : 3 x Cernan signed Apollo 10 covers - all hand signed
- 140492419312 : Apollo 10 crew signed cover - all hand signed
- 140492388767 : Freeman signed cover - hand signed, later cachet
- 140492388190 : C.C. Williams signed cover - hand signed, later cachet
There are many more so it's well worth your time to check all his listings in detail. I'll be happy to post my opinion of anything I've missed. |
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 12-29-2010 06:17 AM
Here's my take on some of gastampman's latest listings: I can't help thinking those three Armstrong signed covers should sell rather well... |
spaceflori Member Posts: 1499 From: Germany Registered: May 2000
|
posted 12-29-2010 06:25 AM
Regarding the source of this fantastic offering:I have bought a similar collection in one of the last Superior sales and based on the type of covers and items I'm fairly sure that these offerings originate from the same source: Margery Himes from Cranberry, PA. I have never heard that name before but my covers bear lots of references to her. Some items on eBay were almost identical to those I got at Superior so what you see here is only a percentage of what she really had. Apparently she got all her stuff herself through the mail (have letters and other inquiries, too) back then. Again this is not 100% proved, but I'm 99.9% sure. |
Ken Havekotte Member Posts: 2914 From: Merritt Island, Florida, Brevard Registered: Mar 2001
|
posted 12-29-2010 06:49 AM
Yes, Florian, the majority of the signed space-related covers are from Margery's collections from PA.I've known, traded, worked with and serviced her covers since the 1970s. She was quite an accumulator of signed covers along with some other space items. |
Tykeanaut Member Posts: 2212 From: Worcestershire, England, UK. Registered: Apr 2008
|
posted 12-29-2010 08:42 AM
I always thought that Neil Armstrong would only sign once for one person? |
capoetc Member Posts: 2169 From: McKinney TX (USA) Registered: Aug 2005
|
posted 12-29-2010 09:36 AM
quote: Originally posted by Tykeanaut: I always thought that Neil Armstrong would only sign once for one person?
Plenty of people went to the well over and over again ... |
gliderpilotuk Member Posts: 3398 From: London, UK Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 12-29-2010 11:17 AM
quote: Originally posted by spaced out: I can't help thinking those three Armstrong signed covers should sell rather well...
Judging by some rather average Anders covers going for $300, I don't doubt it! I can see Lovell increasing his completion fee...
|
SpaceSteve Member Posts: 428 From: San Antonio TX, USA Registered: Apr 2004
|
posted 12-29-2010 05:14 PM
That is one heck of a collection!I do wish though, that he'd sell the covers individually, instead of in groups, i.e., all three Armstrong's together, or as he did last week with the Ed White's. Give collectors who want only one autographed cover of a particular astronaut, a chance to bid. He'd probably also make more money selling each Armstrong, Aldrin, White, etc., individually. |
spaceflori Member Posts: 1499 From: Germany Registered: May 2000
|
posted 12-30-2010 12:49 AM
I'm surprised, too, that such an impressive collection gets sold in such a bad (marketing-wise) way by a common stamp dealer (no offense intended, but a regular stamp dealer just doesn't have the knowledge to properly sell these things).Another warning light for any collector - make sure you tell your relatives, friends, heirs in advance what should happen with your collection once you are gone or possibly not able to judge yourself anymore. |
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 12-30-2010 10:48 AM
And more: |
JasonB Member Posts: 1091 From: Registered: Sep 2003
|
posted 12-30-2010 11:30 AM
quote: Originally posted by Tykeanaut: I always thought that Neil Armstrong would only sign once for one person?
I remember my Dad getting a letter back around 1991-1992 from him stating he'd only sign one autograph per person per lifetime. Before that he'd sign 1 item per request I believe. Since he stopped signing in 1994 he really only had this policy for a couple years.
|
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 01-04-2011 06:55 AM
And still more, this time with a couple of Shepard secretarials to watch out for...
|
mjanovec Member Posts: 3811 From: Midwest, USA Registered: Jul 2005
|
posted 01-05-2011 04:40 PM
quote: Originally posted by JasonB: I remember my Dad getting a letter back around 1991-1992 from him stating he'd only sign one autograph per person per lifetime. Before that he'd sign 1 item per request I believe.
I suspect Armstrong probably preferred to sign only one item per person per lifetime long before 1991...otherwise, it wouldn't make sense to limit it to one signature per request (because that would guarantee that people would just end up sending in multiple requests). By 1991-1992, Armstrong (and his secretary) were probably noticing that many people were indeed making multiple requests...which is why they probably communicated that they only want to send one signature per person per lifetime. I can understand a couple of requests spread out over a few years...but I bet some people sent in multiple requests each year, to build up their "stock" of signatures. That behavior probably hastened Armstrong's decision to stop signing. |
JasonB Member Posts: 1091 From: Registered: Sep 2003
|
posted 01-06-2011 12:37 PM
No I don't remember anything coming from Armstrong before 1990 at the earliest stating he'd only sign one per lifetime. He just would sign one item or request. Sure that might lead to more requests but you also have to remember this was 1990. His signature was easily obtained and had little value compared to today so it wasn't a big deal to get his autograph. Also no one thought he would take the stance that he has taken towards signing. I'm sure many people sent in over and over again but autograph collecting and selling was nowhere near where it is now. |
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 01-07-2011 04:17 AM
As I've received a number of e-mails requesting it, here's my opinion on gastampan's listings ending January 12: Just to be clear here, I'm stating in these posts whether in my opinion each autograph is hand signed or an Autopen (or in some cases a secretarial).If I say that a signature is hand signed that does not necessarily mean they are genuine, although everything I've seen so far in this collection does appear to be so, to my eye at least. |