Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Buy, Sell, Trade
  FS: Apollo 17 flown LM-12 ID Plate (mounted)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   FS: Apollo 17 flown LM-12 ID Plate (mounted)
ritad
Member

Posts: 18
From: brooklyn, ny, usa
Registered: Aug 2010

posted 09-21-2010 04:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ritad     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I inherited this item from my dad. As I've stated on another thread, he was a 25-year Grumman employee involved with the LM project, along with the Shuttle wing.

Images are here.

This is identical to the one offered in an October 2009 Space Exploration auction, only this is mounted to a wooden shield-shaped 10 1/2" long plaque with the mission logo underneath. The ID plate is affixed to the plaque with aluminum screws. I've gently removed/reattached the plate to see if there's anything written underneath it--there are no markings, but it does have a light green coating and some wear by the screw holes on the reverse side. It's marked with the same numbering as found on the ID plate auctioned, and is exactly the same in every way (the numbers are impressed in the metal). The metal ID plate itself does have a slight bow to it. Condition is excellent.

I was advised that only three ID plates were supposed to have been made, flown and given to each of the astronauts; however, my dad owned this since the LM program ended. I don't know if an extra plate or two were produced to keep in the company archives, or if extras were made to give to certain employees since this was the last mission. I do know he was invited to the last Apollo launch but declined due to my mom's health at the time. I don't know if this was given to him instead. I have documentation on his employment, but none on this item.

Would like to sell for the best offer to a collector; I know the ID plates owned by astronauts would be valued higher than one that wasn't. Any other questions, please ask. Many thanks for your consideration!

dfox
Member

Posts: 208
From: Scarsdale, NY, United States
Registered: Mar 2010

posted 09-21-2010 05:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for dfox   Click Here to Email dfox     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What is your email address? I would like to inquire about this item.

spaced out
Member

Posts: 3110
From: Paris, France
Registered: Aug 2003

posted 09-22-2010 01:16 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for spaced out   Click Here to Email spaced out     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This raises some interesting questions. We don't know there whereabouts of Cernan or Schmitt's flown plaques, so in theory it could be one of those. On the other hand none of Schmitt's flown items have ever turned up on the market to-date so that seems an unlikely source. Someone could maybe ask Cernan if he still has his.

It could also be a flight spare, in which case you'd have to assume it wasn't actually flown.

Of course the flown/unflown question makes a BIG difference to the value of the item...

ritad
Member

Posts: 18
From: brooklyn, ny, usa
Registered: Aug 2010

posted 09-22-2010 07:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for ritad     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks, spaced out, I appreciate your input. I scrutinized the plaque again this morning to see if I missed anything even lightly written on the back indicating origin, but nothing. If someone knows Cernan and can ask him about it, it would be fantastic. I definitely understand about the pricing of flown vs. unflown as I'm a collector myself, but my collecting field is 180 degrees from the space category. I'm leaning towards the "spare" theory myself, though I wonder if the extra wear marks on the back corners indicate that it was once attached to something else other than wood. I have a small stack of Grumman interoffice memos pertaining to the LM over the production years, but nothing about this item in there, either.

Does anyone know where the ID plates were affixed on the LM? I have several photos of the LM under construction (one I'm auctioning on ebay right now), but I don't have an interior shot, nor can I find one on the internet.

Thanks again--I'll be posting another item (an unidentified piece of flown metal) and a 1965 Grumman Bethpage map on other threads later today. Hope these will be helpful to members!

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4437
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 09-22-2010 08:39 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm interested in either being included in your email list or advised of your contact information.

------------------
Scott Schneeweis, LCDR, USN(Ret);
SPACEAHOLIC.com

Rocket Chris
Member

Posts: 342
From:
Registered: Nov 2009

posted 09-24-2010 07:24 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Rocket Chris   Click Here to Email Rocket Chris     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
...so is the plate still offered for sell? or is the item still in some investigation?

Please contact me. Thanks.

Rocket Chris
Member

Posts: 342
From:
Registered: Nov 2009

posted 09-27-2010 06:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Rocket Chris   Click Here to Email Rocket Chris     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
...curious... whats the status now? I'm interested to buy it. Whats about the price now?

ritad
Member

Posts: 18
From: brooklyn, ny, usa
Registered: Aug 2010

posted 09-27-2010 08:12 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for ritad     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Please contact me offline by using the email link at the top of this reply--thanks! Rita

spaced out
Member

Posts: 3110
From: Paris, France
Registered: Aug 2003

posted 09-27-2010 08:31 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for spaced out   Click Here to Email spaced out     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ritad:
Does anyone know where the ID plates were affixed on the LM? I have several photos of the LM under construction (one I'm auctioning on ebay right now), but I don't have an interior shot, nor can I find one on the internet.

That's a good question. I imagine it was somewhere easily accessible in the crew cabin as they were purely symbolic items designed explicitly to be removed by the astronauts in-flight and returned as souvenirs.

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4437
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 09-27-2010 10:19 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Its dubious these allegedly returned LM data plates were actually installed - if they were taken aloft I would expect them to be in the APKs.

ritad
Member

Posts: 18
From: brooklyn, ny, usa
Registered: Aug 2010

posted 09-29-2010 12:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ritad     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I appreciate the email contact and input from several members on this item! I agree with spaced out and SpaceAholic that the plates weren't physically attached to the LM. I can’t imagine a mad scramble to work riveted ID plates loose while doing everything else astronauts were required to do (especially in the case of Apollo 13--hey, guys, while you’re trying to survive, don’t forget to grab those ID plates!)

I had the chance to do some additional research the other day, and was able to access the other LM ID plates via the edgeofdarkness website. One detail I noticed is that the serial number on all of the plates through the years was “001”, while the part numbers varied. When comparing the ID plates pictured to the one I have, I saw that the serial number on my dad’s plate is different than the others in that the typeface is wider and centered in the space as opposed to flush left. The “America-Challenger” text is different as well, with the letterspacing much closer together than the others. The Apollo 17 plate pictured on the web has residue on the back from early double-stick tape (the kind that later crumbled, gave up, and whatever was affixed with it fell off). The one my dad owned is attached with screws. The wooden plaque is different in that it has a logo decal rather than the metal LM die cut above the plate; but it looks to be professionally made rather than something done in a home workshop.

So, my assessment is that the ID plate in my possession may have been 1. Made to be flown, but rejected due to the difference in typeface style as stated above, for consistency or quality’s sake; or 2. Restruck at the time in a low number on the same aluminum stock/die as the flown examples as a souvenir, and attached to a slightly different style plaque than those given to the astronauts. It’s definitely made with a die stamp rather than something just screened on the metal. I only wish my dad had written something on the back, or that the Apollo 17 plate at auction was still on its original plaque to compare it.

Based on this, and because a few people have inquired about price, I’ll offer it at $1200 negotiable, plus postage. It seems to be a rare item, but whether it was flown or not may never be confirmed. And if it is confirmed someday, great...we all need a little good luck with our collections. If anyone out there is interested, please contact me at the email link above.

Thanks again!

Lem13
New Member

Posts:
From:
Registered:

posted 10-02-2010 10:57 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lem13   Click Here to Email Lem13     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Your Email is blank, how do we get in touch?

Rick Mulheirn
Member

Posts: 4167
From: England
Registered: Feb 2001

posted 10-03-2010 04:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Rick Mulheirn   Click Here to Email Rick Mulheirn     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ritad:
I can’t imagine a mad scramble to work riveted ID plates loose while doing everything else astronauts were required to do
Don't you believe it. It was commonplace for the astronauts to remove bits and pieces from spacecraft, some of which required quite a bit of time and expertise to complete. The LM hand controller currently owned by Ed Mitchell and a similar controller once owned by Jim Irwin for instance, netting, hatch decals, navigational aides and the likes. And they are just the items we know about.

GACspaceguy
Member

Posts: 2475
From: Guyton, GA
Registered: Jan 2006

posted 10-03-2010 06:21 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for GACspaceguy   Click Here to Email GACspaceguy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
From Wikipedia:
A rivet is a permanent mechanical fastener. Before being installed a rivet consists of a smooth cylindrical shaft with a head on one end. The end opposite the head is called the buck-tail. On installation the rivet is placed in a pre-drilled hole, and the tail is upset, or bucked (i.e. deformed), so that it expands to about 1.5 times the original shaft diameter, holding the rivet in place. To distinguish between the two ends of the rivet, the original head is called the factory head and the deformed end is called the shop head or buck-tail.
Therefore in order to remove this type of fastener you have to drill off the factory head to remove it completely using the same drill diameter as the shank diameter of the rivet and then punch out the shaft and the attached bucked tail. That is, in order to keep the holes intact I think these types of tools would not have been available nor would they want the shavings from the drilling operation inside the LM especially once they were on orbit.

I have seen many data plates similar to this one and they are all installed with rivets to make them permanent so that there would be no possible way for an assembly to get mixed up (it also allows for more secure traceability of the assembly). Unless there is some documentation for these data plates stating that they were installed with typical removable fasteners I believe they would have stayed located in the place they were installed.

Rick Mulheirn
Member

Posts: 4167
From: England
Registered: Feb 2001

posted 10-03-2010 08:32 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Rick Mulheirn   Click Here to Email Rick Mulheirn     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I think it safe to say Rita's implication was the crews would be too busy to spend time removing pieces from the spacecraft. It is a given that anything riveted to a bulkhead for instance would remain in place. But Charlie Duke told me he spent quite some time trying to remove his LM hand controller but failed. Ed Mitchell on the other hand rehearsed the procedure prior to his flight and was able to "field strip" the controller in double quick time.

ritad
Member

Posts: 18
From: brooklyn, ny, usa
Registered: Aug 2010

posted 10-03-2010 03:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ritad     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Rick Mulheirn:
I think it safe to say Rita's implication was the crews would be too busy to spend time removing pieces from the spacecraft. It is a given that anything riveted to a bulkhead for instance would remain in place.

That was what I was thinking. I also should have specified that my dad used to speak about things being "riveted" in place, so that any hardware wouldn't shake loose during the turbulence at takeoff. Thanks for all the insight as well; interesting that there was a practice session on removing the controller!

If anyone wants to email me, please use rdubasdes@mindspring.com, that's my registered address here. Thanks!

Rick Mulheirn
Member

Posts: 4167
From: England
Registered: Feb 2001

posted 10-03-2010 04:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Rick Mulheirn   Click Here to Email Rick Mulheirn     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ritad:
interesting that there was a practice session on removing the controller!
I am sure Rita this was NOT some kind of approved NASA procedure, rather something Shepard and Mitchell did during moments of down time. I wonder just how many hand controllers were removed in total? Apollo 14 and 15 I know about. Apollo 16 tried and failed... Anybody able to shed light on the question?

spaced out
Member

Posts: 3110
From: Paris, France
Registered: Aug 2003

posted 10-04-2010 07:13 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for spaced out   Click Here to Email spaced out     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I asked one of the moonwalkers if they remembered where the LM id plates were installed and he told me that as far as he remembers they were stowed in the LM OFK/PPKs.

That being the case, where does that leave us with Apollo 15 lunar surface PPKs being accidentally left behind in the LEM? Irwin's LM spacecraft id plate was sold this year at Bonhams, which implies that at least some PPK or OFK material was brought back from the Lunar Module.

dsenechal
Member

Posts: 539
From:
Registered: Dec 2002

posted 10-04-2010 09:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for dsenechal   Click Here to Email dsenechal     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Here's a picture from LM-9. My guess would be that the "official" ID plate was riveted to the LM as shown, and a handful of duplicates (3 perhaps?) were included in the PPKs.

spaced out
Member

Posts: 3110
From: Paris, France
Registered: Aug 2003

posted 10-05-2010 06:24 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for spaced out   Click Here to Email spaced out     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
That photo is a good find.

So that's it then - an 'original' plate was fixed in each spacecraft and not removed/returned, and three duplicates carried in the PPKs or OFK to present to the crew post flight.

Other duplicates may have been produced at the same time as spares, and this was likely the source of the example being offered here.

ritad
Member

Posts: 18
From: brooklyn, ny, usa
Registered: Aug 2010

posted 10-05-2010 07:49 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for ritad     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I was so happy to see this photo! It was better than a shot of caffeine this morning. Thanks for posting it, and for the evidence confirming that my dad's ID plate must have been a spare. That pretty much solves the mystery for me, and I appreciate all the input and effort.

It will be here with me should anyone want to add it to their collection. I'm keeping some of his photos, interoffice memos and his Apollo 13 presentation piece so I can display them properly. I've adjusted the ID plate price further up in the thread, and my email address is there as well.

If I find any written reference to the Apollo 17 plate, I'll post it, but so far, nothing.

Thanks again!

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4437
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 10-05-2010 08:48 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Validation of any examples of the returned LM plates as having been lunar landed remains an open question (for me). Astronauts were required to disclose the contents of their Lunar Module transported APKs to MSC and the total number of items permitted for carry were 12 - anybody had a peak at the lists to see if these plates were included? Fellow collector David Scott on his site recaps the contents of Cernan's LM APK (Apollo 17) - no ID plates.

Larry McGlynn
Member

Posts: 1255
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Jul 2003

posted 10-05-2010 09:41 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Larry McGlynn   Click Here to Email Larry McGlynn     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
There were separate OFKs for official NASA material in the CM. They carried flags and other mementos in those bags. I will check to see if there were any placed in the LM. I believe there was one placed in the Apollo 11 LM and NASA placed a large one in the CM on the Apollo 17 mission.

We do know that Grumman produced LM plates for the crews as presentation pieces and flew them.

You can't rely on the PPK lists alone, because the crews also carried other packages of material like beta cloth patches and flag kits separately up in one of the lockers located in the CM tunnel.

Let's see if we can put all that information together.

------------------
Larry McGlynn
A Tribute to Apollo
www.apollotribute.blogspot.com

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4437
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 10-05-2010 10:24 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Should be reflected in the ASL - weight/space configuration management being even more critical in the LM. The ASL's I have reviewed show the OFK and APK's uploaded to the CM, but only the APK's designated for xfer.

Larry McGlynn
Member

Posts: 1255
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Jul 2003

posted 10-05-2010 11:03 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Larry McGlynn   Click Here to Email Larry McGlynn     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Scott, I agree with you. I think all OKFs stayed in the CM, but I want to check with people who worked with them and find out if they remember anything about those LM plates and where they were carried.

The trouble is that up until Apollo 17, LM crews tended to carry more than one PPK on the LM. The question is how many in each flight, because they varied per flight. The PPK lists tended to lump several items as one on the lists. We have ancedotal evidence to that fact from astronauts.

In fact, one astronaut carried 28 items to the lunar surface. Now that number was listed on his PPK list. The real fact is that each one of those listed items were multiples and in actuality he carried approximately 75 separate mementos to the lunar surface.

So it is worth while asking if those LM plates went to the surface. While chances are they didn't, at least we might find out what did occur with them once and for all.

Then again, maybe we won't, but we asked.

spaced out
Member

Posts: 3110
From: Paris, France
Registered: Aug 2003

posted 10-05-2010 12:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for spaced out   Click Here to Email spaced out     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Even with Apollo 17's limit of 12 items this was apparently interpreted in a relaxed way, in as much as a pack of 25 US flags might be designated as a single item in the list.

This is something that's been discussed in previous posts although we still don't have clear answers to questions like this.

ritad
Member

Posts: 18
From: brooklyn, ny, usa
Registered: Aug 2010

posted 10-11-2010 11:18 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for ritad     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The ID plate has been sold--thanks again to all!

I'll continue to post on this topic if I find any information to add to the discussion.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement