Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Hardware & Flown Items
  Value of movie props vs space artifacts

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Value of movie props vs space artifacts
spaced out
Member

Posts: 3110
From: Paris, France
Registered: Aug 2003

posted 06-24-2018 08:35 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for spaced out   Click Here to Email spaced out     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
People sometimes react with surprise at the amount fetched by some of the high-end items in space memorabilia auctions but I have to say that in many ways these prices are remarkably low compared to other memorabilia, e.g. antiquities, art, music memorabilia, and movie memorabilia.

Just as an example, yesterday there was an auction of movie memorabilia which included a prop blaster used by Han Solo in Return of the Jedi (1 of 4 used in the film). This sold with a hammer price of $550,000, or $670,000 with fees.

Even a non-hero prop gun — a resin pistol from one of the Imperial Scout speed bikers in the film — sold for $90,625, or $116,000 with fees.

Maybe the upcoming auction of items direct from Neil Armstrong's estate will push things in the space market higher but for now historic space artifacts have a long way to go before they ever catch up with collectibles from popular culture.

YankeeClipper
Member

Posts: 617
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Mar 2011

posted 06-24-2018 09:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for YankeeClipper   Click Here to Email YankeeClipper     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It's amazing what can happen when you pimp an old Mauser C96 9mm, cover it with "Greasepaint" and sprinkle it with Tinseltown glitter and stardust.

The Force is strong with this one!

SkyMan1958
Member

Posts: 867
From: CA.
Registered: Jan 2011

posted 06-24-2018 07:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SkyMan1958   Click Here to Email SkyMan1958     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'll never forget in 2009 Jim Lovell's Apollo 8 "CMP Checklist" went up for auction. With commission it went for $47,800. During the same year the model for the spaceship Enterprise (from Star Trek: TNG) went, with commission for — $550,000.

It just blew me away, here you could buy an extremely important, heavily marked up, checklist for Apollo 8, the actual first flight to the Moon, for under $50,000, or you could buy a spaceship model used for a TV show for over 11 times that price. It seemed little short of insane to me.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42981
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 06-24-2018 09:57 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Is that a fair comparison, though?

One item is a highly visual, some might say iconic piece of art, and the other is a stack of paper that accompanied humans on a fantastic, albeit first-of-its-type voyage. What if instead of a checklist, it had been Jim Lovell's flown Apollo 8 A7L spacesuit? Ignoring the impossibility of that scenario, would the Enterprise model still have sold for more? Maybe, maybe not.

spaced out
Member

Posts: 3110
From: Paris, France
Registered: Aug 2003

posted 06-25-2018 01:17 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for spaced out   Click Here to Email spaced out     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Robert - you're right of course. Many of the most visually iconic flown items from the Apollo missions are exactly those that are not available to private collectors - the suits, the helmets, the PLSSs, the boots, the gloves... If those were in the private sphere I believe they would have been selling for 5 figures sums all along.

DMScott
Member

Posts: 354
From: Lexington, MA, USA
Registered: Dec 2005

posted 06-25-2018 04:19 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for DMScott   Click Here to Email DMScott     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Somewhat equivalent to Star Wars stuff could be an Apollo DSKY. It's an iconic item that displays beautifully and has a story to tell.

My research suggests the following sales in the past ten years (including BP):

  1. Heritage, October 2009 - $50,787.50
  2. RR, Sept 2011 - $92,865.60
  3. RR, April 2015 - $65,189.60
  4. Heritage, May 2017 - $87,500
  5. Heritage November 2017 - $47,500

YankeeClipper
Member

Posts: 617
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Mar 2011

posted 06-25-2018 07:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for YankeeClipper   Click Here to Email YankeeClipper     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
One shouldn't forget that in November 2011 at Heritage Auctions market interest was strong enough to push Jim Lovell's Apollo 13 Flown LM Systems Activation Checklist to a record-setting $388,375.

As collectSPACE reported at the time:

The checklist drew the most ever paid for a mission-used document due in part to it being featured — in prop form — during Ron Howard's 1995 movie "Apollo 13" starring Tom Hanks as Lovell. "If this paperwork isn't right, who knows where we will end up out here," Hanks, as Lovell, says in the film, referring to the checklist.

Heritage previously said that an "East Coast collector" had purchased the artifact, but with its ownership in question, it is now holding onto the checklist.

This is a crossover case of a real space artifact with Hollywood credentials and serious global media exposure first in 1970 with the actual incident, then in 1995 with the film release, and again in 2011 with the space history and memorabilia auction.

One year later in November 2012 at RR Auctions, Dave Scott's Apollo 15 Lunar Surface EVA Cuff Checklist sold for $364,452.

Then in October 2015 at RR Auctions, serious horology collectors pushed Dave Scott's Apollo 15 Lunar Surface Bulova Wrist Chronograph to an astronomical $1,625,000.

Later that year in December 2015 at Christies, a Ron Evans Apollo 17 Flown Omega Speedmaster sold for $245,000.

Crossover space artifacts that generate and attract interest from multiple collector genres will usually command and realize exceptional prices at auction.

p51
Member

Posts: 1642
From: Olympia, WA
Registered: Sep 2011

posted 06-25-2018 08:58 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for p51   Click Here to Email p51     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
You think this went for some bucks, in relation to your perception of value? Look into the auction for all the stuff from the Battlestar Galactica reboot, a few years ago. Single sheets of paper went for hundreds of dollars.

As for the Star Wars blaster, don't forget that George Lucas kept almost all the props and costumes from those movies, so anything screen-used is SO much rarer than anything flown in space. Think flown Apollo space suit in terms of rarity of coming into collector hands.

rgarner
Member

Posts: 1193
From: Shepperton, United Kingdom
Registered: Mar 2012

posted 06-25-2018 09:01 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rgarner   Click Here to Email rgarner     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I own a screen-used hero lightsaber from Episode 2, and I paid a pretty penny for that. But I've also paid a lot for space memorabilia too. I honestly don't think it is fair to compare the two markets as they're so vastly different in their achievements.

1202 Alarm
Member

Posts: 436
From: Switzerland & France
Registered: Nov 2003

posted 06-25-2018 09:50 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for 1202 Alarm   Click Here to Email 1202 Alarm     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
To add to the discussion, though I buy Apollo flown hardware or parchments signed by kings of France, I often paid more for my Disney original movie cells or Alien movie props. The obvious order of historical importance is almost never reflected in auction price or public attention, apart for the "big pieces" mentioned above. But Peter Pan is part of my life like Neil Armstrong, I love to own souvenirs of both and price is not the main point.

YankeeClipper
Member

Posts: 617
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Mar 2011

posted 06-25-2018 11:12 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for YankeeClipper   Click Here to Email YankeeClipper     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by rgarner:
I honestly don't think it is fair to compare the two markets...
Oh I don't know about that, some people are convinced they are both in the Science Fiction genre!

rgarner
Member

Posts: 1193
From: Shepperton, United Kingdom
Registered: Mar 2012

posted 06-25-2018 12:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rgarner   Click Here to Email rgarner     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well, those people can be given a tour of the nearest airlock.

Solarplexus
Member

Posts: 107
From: Norway
Registered: Jan 2014

posted 06-25-2018 01:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Solarplexus     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What about this? Would you have bought it, or 1000 top notch space memorabilia?
As records were being broken at contemporary art auctions this week, the hedge fund billionaire Steven A. Cohen privately scooped up a de Kooning "Woman" painting for roughly $137.5 million, adding to the prestige of a personal collection that is fast becoming one of the world's greatest.

rgarner
Member

Posts: 1193
From: Shepperton, United Kingdom
Registered: Mar 2012

posted 06-25-2018 02:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rgarner   Click Here to Email rgarner     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It looks like a child's drawing of a horse.

YankeeClipper
Member

Posts: 617
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Mar 2011

posted 06-25-2018 02:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for YankeeClipper   Click Here to Email YankeeClipper     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Good grief! Contemporary masterpiece? More like an utter load of garbage and complete waste of $137.5 million.

Georgina Adam's Dark Side of the Boom about the excesses of the art market in the 21st Century and the irrational and exorbitant prices paid by investors lacking in art expertise is worth a read.

Then there are the doubts regarding the provenance and artistic authenticity and integrity of Salvator Mundi - would you drop half a billion dollars on an over-painted over-cleaned something that might have been by the hand of da Vinci?

Solarplexus
Member

Posts: 107
From: Norway
Registered: Jan 2014

posted 06-25-2018 04:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Solarplexus     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
No. I do believe I go for five, 30,000 square feet luxury mansions in five city's and fill them with space memorabilia. Then 100 vintage and new sport cars. Three, four helicopters, a private jet or two, a yacht. So set myself on the launch list on all private space tourist companies. Maybe a submarine, can be fun. Only drink vine from the 19th century, a kilo Russian caviar maybe... per day. Pay the Kardashians to sing for me... every morning. And still I got 250 million to spend. Hmm, but that painting looked nice though. Well, decisions decisions.

SkyMan1958
Member

Posts: 867
From: CA.
Registered: Jan 2011

posted 06-25-2018 07:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SkyMan1958   Click Here to Email SkyMan1958     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
No matter what the type of collectible, markets wax and wane for all types. Right now the art market is very hot for modern (e.g. 20th and 21st century) material. If you have the scratch, you can get some of the great classical artists of western art for relative chump change.

Along those lines, is material from the MGA period just starting to catch fire, or is it at a peak, due to baby boomers, who grew up with the space program, being at the peak of their earnings potential? Obviously we won't know until 50 to 100 years hence.

oly
Member

Posts: 905
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: Apr 2015

posted 06-25-2018 11:51 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for oly   Click Here to Email oly     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What you don't see are fragments of movie collectables, such as cartoon art cells being cut up and set in resin, with a COA stating that is the real thing, so that eventually people end up bidding on a single piece of confetti with no unique identity.

The fan base is also somewhat more extreme, with events like Comic Con demonstrating just how enthusiastic fans can be.

Events such as the 50th anniversary of a mission, or the release of a movie that generates interest bring a new batch of collectors with new found interest to the market, as "The Martian" movie.

It intrigues me why there is not a greater supply of replica space industry items available. Items such as replica Apollo flashlights and flight plans draw a limited amount of interest, and there would be a small market for accurate replica Apollo LEVA or bubble helmets, but these would not gain as much attention as replica Star Wars storm trooper helmets and similar items get world wide.

It would be interesting to know how the numbers compare of sales of NASA Tee shirts versus popular sports team shirts, and how the sales trend during major events.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement