|
Author
|
Topic: Three most common PPK items
|
mensax Member Posts: 861 From: Virginia Registered: Apr 2002
|
posted July 16, 2003 06:30 PM
I believe the three most common PPK items that were flown during the Apollo missions were American flags, State flags (including foriegn countries), and mission patches. I was wondering how these items would rank in value taking into consideration the mission they were flown on. I'd be interested in everyone's opinion.So, first I thought... rank the missions themselves by valuations... A11 A13 A8 A17 A16 A15 A12 A14 A10 A9 A7 American flags (AF) always seem to bring top dollar. Patches in the middle. State flags (SF) on the bottom. Let's assume these all are lunar orbit and not surface items. So... A11 AF A11 patch A11 SF A13 AF A13 patch A13 SF A8 AF A8 patch A8 SF A17 AF A17 patch A17 SF A16 AF A16 patch A16 SF A15 AF A15 patch A15 SF A12 AF A12 patch A12 SF A14 AF A14 patch A14 SF A10 AF A10 patch A10 SF A9 AF A9 patch A9 SF A7 AF A7 patch A7 SF Nooooo... That doesn't look right I can see this is not going to be easy... How about... A11 AF A11 patch A13 AF A8 AF A13 patch A8 patch A17 AF A17 patch A16 AF A16 patch A15 AF A15 patch A12 AF A12 patch A14 AF A14 patch A11 SF A10 AF A10 patch A13 SF A8 SF A9 AF A9 patch A7 AF A7 patch A17 SF A16 SF A15 SF A12 SF A14 SF A10 SF A9 SF A7 SF Well... that looks better. Now to add in the lunar surface items which would include ... perhaps in this order... A11 AF (lunar surface) A11 patch (lunar surface) A17 AF (lunar surface) A17 patch (lunar surface) A16 AF (lunar surface) A16 patch (lunar surface) A15 AF (lunar surface) A15 patch (lunar surface) A12 AF (lunar surface) A12 patch (lunar surface) A14 AF (lunar surface) A14 patch (lunar surface) A11 SF (lunar surface) A17 SF (lunar surface) A16 SF (lunar surface) A15 SF (lunar surface) A12 SF (lunar surface) A14 SF (lunar surface) Ok, so now to blend the lunar surface items in with the others... A11 AF (lunar surface) A11 patch (lunar surface) A11 AF A11 patch A17 AF (lunar surface) A17 patch (lunar surface) A13 AF A8 AF A16 AF (lunar surface) A16 patch (lunar surface) A13 patch A8 patch A15 AF (lunar surface) A15 patch (lunar surface) A12 AF (lunar surface) A12 patch (lunar surface) A17 AF A17 patch A14 AF (lunar surface) A14 patch (lunar surface) A16 AF A16 patch A15 AF A15 patch A12 AF A12 patch A14 AF A14 patch A11 SF A10 AF A10 patch A13 SF A8 SF A9 AF A9 patch A7 AF A7 patch A11 SF (lunar surface) A17 SF (lunar surface) A16 SF (lunar surface) A15 SF (lunar surface) A12 SF (lunar surface) A14 SF (lunar surface) A17 SF A16 SF A15 SF A12 SF A14 SF A10 SF A9 SF A7 SF OK!! What do you think? Anybody care to refine this list? Noah |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 23493 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted July 16, 2003 06:44 PM
All I can say Noah, is that you must have a lot of extra time on your hands  Very interesting post. I would say in general, I think you are underevaluating the lunar surface state flags, especially from missions Apollo 11 and Apollo 17. One thing your chart should take into consideration is the overall pecking order when it comes to where an object has traveled on a U.S. mission. In general, the following applies (from most valued to least): Lunar surface exposed Lunar surface carried (outside the LM) Lunar surface landed Lunar orbit Sub-orbital trajectory (specifically, MR3 and MR4) Earth orbit on Apollo Earth orbit on Mercury Earth orbit on Gemini Earth orbit on Skylab Earth orbit on Shuttle/ISS So here is my take on your final list: A11 AF (lunar surface) A11 patch (lunar surface) A11 AF A11 patch A17 AF (lunar surface) A17 patch (lunar surface) A11 SF (lunar surface) A16 AF (lunar surface) A13 AF A8 AF A16 patch (lunar surface) A13 patch A8 patch A15 AF (lunar surface) A15 patch (lunar surface) A12 AF (lunar surface) A12 patch (lunar surface) A17 AF A17 patch A17 SF (lunar surface) A14 AF (lunar surface) A14 patch (lunar surface) A16 SF (lunar surface) A15 SF (lunar surface) A12 SF (lunar surface) A14 SF (lunar surface) A16 AF A16 patch A15 AF A15 patch A12 AF A12 patch A14 AF A14 patch A11 SF A10 AF A10 patch A13 SF A8 SF A9 AF A9 patch A7 AF A7 patch A17 SF A16 SF A15 SF A12 SF A14 SF A10 SF A9 SF A7 SF |
mensax Member Posts: 861 From: Virginia Registered: Apr 2002
|
posted July 17, 2003 09:07 AM
"All I can say Noah, is that you must have a lot of extra time on your hands" LOL! maybe so... but in this case I believe it was just too much coffee! Thanks for your updated list. It is very interesting to look through the list and see how much it bounces around... What do think about sewn patches versus beta patches? Were there equal quantities flown... is one more valued than the other? |
Larry McGlynn Member Posts: 732 From: Boston, MA Registered: Jul 2003
|
posted July 17, 2003 10:18 AM
NoahYou asked about the sewn patches vs beta patches. I believe there were less sewn patches taken on missions. I have seen stacks of beta patches in cleanroom sealed plastic bags. Due to the thickness of the sewn items including flags, there aren't as many. I just don't know how many. I do like the beta patches over the sewn pieces because the astronauts can write on them and specifically state that the item has flown. Another reason is due to the fact that beta cloth had such an important role in the missions. ------------------ Larry McGlynn A Tribute to Apollo [This message has been edited by Larry McGlynn (edited July 17, 2003).] |
Scott Member Posts: 3272 From: Houston, TX Registered: May 2001
|
posted July 17, 2003 10:52 AM
Also remember that anything with lunar dust or soil adhering to it increases its value exponentially compared to a similar item which may have been stowed inside an always sealed container or pouch for the duration of the voyage. Lunar surface items which were used outside the LM are not the only items which may possess lunar material. As Charlie Duke has pointed out, the astronauts tracked lots of dust into the LM after their EVAs, and upon Lunar Orbital Insertion (following ascent) when the gravity was once again zero, all the dust on the floor of the LM floated up all around the cabin and stuck to just about everything, and stayed permanently on things with nooks and crannies (like fabrics) or exposed adhesives. Scott |
NC Apollo Fan Member Posts: 255 From: Belmont, NC USA Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted July 17, 2003 11:44 AM
I would place a higher premium on the beta patches (as opposed to sewn patches). To me they are more attractive and, being beta, they were important to the program. As Larry has also noted, they are easier to inscribe.This is a difficult (but interesting) thread because so much of it will be subjective to the collector. For example, I might imagine that Wayne values his flown A12 Texas state flag just as much or more than he would if it were the Stars and Stripes. Charlie Duke took along North and South Carolina state flags because he is from that part of the country - having one of those carries a special value in my opinion. Generally speaking however, I agree with Robert. I think that the state flags deserve a bit more in terms of valuation in the list. I would also include the Robbins Medallions toward the top of any flown category - they are attactive and have a well established history in most cases. Though I'm not sure of exactly where they were flown - perhaps not in the PPKs? Jonathan
|
mensax Member Posts: 861 From: Virginia Registered: Apr 2002
|
posted July 17, 2003 04:50 PM
Larry, you've got to tell me more!..."I have seen stacks of beta patches in cleanroom sealed plastic bags. Due to the thickness of the sewn items including flags, there aren't as many. I just don't know how many." Where did you see these? .................................. I agree that many of the beta cloth patches are preferable as they can be signed and are very attractive. But, in my opinion, some patches are more attractive as sewn patches than they are in beta cloth, Apollo 8 comes to mind. And the sewn patches must be a rarity in comparison. How many flown, sewn, Apollo 17 patches have you seen? So, maybe sometimes beta patches are more valuable, and sometimes sewn patches are more valuable, depending on which mission they are? I would imagine that Apollo 13 patches are the most variable in value as their demand is more connected with the general population than is the case with other items. The opposite being true for Apollo 8 which has a great deal of respect among "those in the know". I for one am a big fan of flown flags, but it does seem that after one has collected one or two American flags that you would seek unique items making the patches a more desirable collectable among "seasoned collectors" than more American flags. Noah
|
spaceman1953 Member Posts: 840 From: South Bend, IN United States of America Registered: Apr 2002
|
posted July 17, 2003 08:18 PM
I think there were more than a few astronauts who flew their wedding rings in their PPK's, weren't there !?!? I sent Alan Shepard a little plastic Mercury space capsule/pencil sharpener with the sparpener removed and cramed it with an American flag and some other stuff and asked if he would fly it on A14....but, of course, I got it back with a letter of regrets ! I think flags and patches are the most frequent things flown.....Jim Weatherbee, a Notre Dame grad, flew a REALLY old medal for ND from the professor here who the wind tunnel building is named after (???) but I sure cannot remember his name....ZAHM ???? Gene Bella |
Larry McGlynn Member Posts: 732 From: Boston, MA Registered: Jul 2003
|
posted July 17, 2003 11:19 PM
Noah,I have seen the betas in various places where the astronauts have brought them (like the autograph shows). Now as for flown flags, I am partial to US flags. I like our country's flag it's pretty and I like the colors. I have ten flown flags in my collections only two are not US flags. And astronauts did fly personal items in their PPK's. Aldrin brought a communion kit with him in his lunar surface PPK. It's those personal items that make this hobby interesting. ------------------ Larry McGlynn A Tribute to Apollo |
4allmankind Member Posts: 651 From: NJ Registered: Jan 2004
|
posted August 14, 2005 07:46 PM
I found this topic from quite some time ago that I find to be an invaluable post for those who collect flown atrifacts- I felt it deserved to be refreshed.Because this post is of some age, would anyone care to add their thoughts on if the "order" of hobby preference has changed? I would love some of the more experienced collectors/dealers to add their 2 cents to the above ranked-list. Jay
|
Richard New Member Posts: 5 From: Morrisonville, New York USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 16, 2005 03:26 PM
I would think the order of these would be somewhat different now. For example, would people really value an A17 AF more highly than an A14 AF lunar surface? |
4allmankind Member Posts: 651 From: NJ Registered: Jan 2004
|
posted August 16, 2005 10:08 PM
I totally agree...My 2 cents... #1- I think all lunar flags now need to get bumped up a few notches. #2- I think I would value the A8 items more then A13 items. Generally speaking. |
Matt T Member Posts: 1313 From: Chester, Cheshire, UK Registered: May 2001
|
posted August 17, 2005 03:21 AM
I'd add that in terms of desirability the whole 'set' is becoming less attractive to me with each passing year. With three major space auctions a year, Gene Cernan selling through Novaspace and astros like Duke and Aldrin selling direct there is still no sign of the supply of lunar artifacts drying up, in fact maybe the reverse.There are still many Apollo astronauts whose personal mementoes haven't reached the market in any numbers yet - Young, Mattingly, Schmitt, Armstrong, Anders, Schweickart, McDivitt etc. We all like to joke about Buzz and the U-Haul behind the CM, but in fairness there's been a plentiful supply of lunar items from Cernan, Scott and Duke in recent years. Not to mention all the things NASA gave away over the years. Well into the 1980s some guys were still being given lunar flown flags as a retirement present. Maybe they still are? This stuff is rare, certainly - just not as rare as we like to tell ourselves. Oh and for the record, my top item would be a piece of lunar flown spacesuit, A11 first, then any mission. Cheers, Matt ------------------ www.spaceracemuseum.com |
mensax Member Posts: 861 From: Virginia Registered: Apr 2002
|
posted August 17, 2005 07:44 AM
I don't believe there has been any change in the order of these PPK valuations as a result of a couple of years going by. Sure, there is plenty of room for debate about "this item should be here" in the list. It was true then and now. With regard to Apollo 17 flags... we've all seen a lot of items from Gene Cernan's personal collection come up for sale... but I don't recall him selling a single flag nor do I recall seeing one ever sell from Harrison Schmitt. There is no doubt of the significance of Apollo 8, an incredible mission of historic importance rivaling Apollo 11. But to the average Joe on the street, Apollo 13 outshines it. Go down to KSC and visit the gift shop... Apollo 11 and 13 items outnumber everything else combined. If you want to buy a space collectable with the greatest chance of it increasing in value, then seek something that will be desired by people outside of the collecting community... A11 and A13. And yes, there are quite a few of these PPK items "out there" (there a thousands of times as many A11 signed crew photos), but like A11 photos they are still rare, that is there are not as many of them as there are folks that would like to have them. These PPK items are just tremendous when framed and properly presented. There are many lawyers, doctors, and executives who would love to have one of these beauties hanging on their office wall. I believe we will see an ever escalating increase in the price of these PPK items. The recent Astronaut Scholarship Auction brought all time high hammer bids and I think that the Fall Aurora auction will realize the same. I'll be very interested to see what the final sale figures will be at the current Mastronet sale. Noah [This message has been edited by mensax (edited August 17, 2005).] |
Matt T Member Posts: 1313 From: Chester, Cheshire, UK Registered: May 2001
|
posted August 17, 2005 08:23 AM
For what it's worth, regarding the Apollo 17 flags - both of the NASA retirement gift flags I have seen recently were flown on A17, both seemed to be lunar orbit. I guess NASA knew they wouldn't be going back to the moon anytime soon and stocked up on supplies.I wonder how many they have left now? Cheers, Matt ------------------ www.spaceracemuseum.com |
Matt T Member Posts: 1313 From: Chester, Cheshire, UK Registered: May 2001
|
posted August 21, 2005 05:53 AM
And as luck would have it - here's two more!  Apollo 17 Space Flown Flag Signed by Gene Cernan and Christopher Craft David H. Greenshields Apollo XVII Flag Flown To Moon Cheers, Matt ------------------ www.spaceracemuseum.com [This message has been edited by collectSPACE Admin (edited August 21, 2005).] |
4allmankind Member Posts: 651 From: NJ Registered: Jan 2004
|
posted August 21, 2005 08:28 PM
Matt- Interesting pieces (and prices).I have a question...Are flags such as these from Apollo missions flown in any particular astronauts PPK? I assume these are agency presentations (similar to the vintage flown flags attached to the 'white/cream' colored certificates) and not given out by any particular member of the crew. Did NASA as an organization have their own PPK of flags etc to give personnel or were these pieces included in a crew members PPK? I am sorry if this has been covered before...I am just curious. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 23493 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted August 21, 2005 08:55 PM
The government's PPK was in fact the OFK, or Official Flight Kit (though the astronauts did carry flags of their own in their PPK as desired). Apollo 11 and Apollo 17 (at least) also carried a special flag kit for later presentation to the states and nations of the world.For more details, see: Articles Authorized to be Carried on Manned Spaceflight Missions |
Matt T Member Posts: 1313 From: Chester, Cheshire, UK Registered: May 2001
|
posted August 22, 2005 03:18 AM
The article Robert links to raises a few interesting facts, but the main one that strikes me is the size and location of the OFK. Ten times bigger than all the PPKs combined(!) and limited to the CSM.So not one of those nice NASA certificates is a lunar surface flag? Cheers, Matt ------------------ www.spaceracemuseum.com |