|
Author
|
Topic: thoughts
|
Helen
New Member Posts:
From:
Registered:
|
posted 10-30-2003 03:20 PM
   
Any thoughts on these two please
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3562694548&category=13543
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3250324157
|
Scott
Member Posts: 3307
From: Houston, TX
Registered: May 2001
|
posted 10-30-2003 05:10 PM
First one: awful scan. Need to see a better scan.Second one: I think this one was discussed last week. I believe the consensus is that it is probably authentic. |
chet
Member Posts: 1506
From: Beverly Hills, Calif.
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 10-30-2003 05:19 PM
Hi Helen,Scott is right, the scan of the book is awful, but from what can be gleaned the
signature is no good (and which probably explains the poor quality scan). -chet [This message has been edited by chet (edited October 31, 2003).] |
Helen
New Member Posts:
From:
Registered:
|
posted 10-31-2003 04:31 AM
Hi-
thanks for the info, so I would be OK to place a bid on the second one ? |
gliderpilotuk
Member Posts: 3398
From: London, UK
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 10-31-2003 05:16 AM
Personally I wouldn't touch the first one (book) with a bargepole.
Likewise the second one: the curves on the N and A look totally overdone. The vertical downward stroke on the A is at an odd angle and the horizontal crossing of the A is too long. Check out other examples in "Relics".
Paul[This message has been edited by gliderpilotuk (edited October 31, 2003).] |
Scott
Member Posts: 3307
From: Houston, TX
Registered: May 2001
|
posted 10-31-2003 08:49 AM
Paul is right. If I had to give only two words of advice about these, they would be "Keep looking". |
fabfivefreddy
Member Posts: 1067
From: Leawood, Kansas USA
Registered: Oct 2003
|
posted 10-31-2003 11:06 PM
Likely a forgery |
advertisement