Author
|
Topic: Photo of the week 802 (March 7, 2020)
|
heng44 Member Posts: 3406 From: Netherlands Registered: Nov 2001
|
posted 03-07-2020 04:02 AM
The crew module for Space Shuttle Challenger arrives at the Rockwell plant in Palmdale in July 1981. Enterprise is at left. |
Tom Member Posts: 1605 From: New York Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 03-07-2020 08:21 AM
Wow... in less than 2 years Challenger would have two flights completed! |
randy Member Posts: 2204 From: West Jordan, Utah USA Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 03-07-2020 09:34 AM
Cool pic! |
OV-105 Member Posts: 818 From: Ridgecrest, CA Registered: Sep 2000
|
posted 03-07-2020 01:14 PM
I wonder why Enterprise was back at AF Plant 42 at that time. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 43366 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 03-07-2020 04:29 PM
According to NASA, after being used for fit checks on Kennedy Space Center's Pad 39A, Enterprise was ferried to Dryden Flight Research Facility on Aug. 16, 1979... ...and then returned overland to Rockwell's Palmdale final assembly facility on Oct. 30, 1979. Certain components were refurbished for use on flight vehicles being assembled at Palmdale. The Enterprise was then returned overland to the Dryden Flight Research Facility on Sept. 6, 1981. |
Philip Member Posts: 5976 From: Brussels, Belgium Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 03-08-2020 05:33 AM
Enterprise was never destined to be turned in a 100% operational orbiter... right? |
Mike Dixon Member Posts: 1416 From: Kew, Victoria, Australia Registered: May 2003
|
posted 03-08-2020 05:46 AM
NASASpaceflight: Space Shuttle Enterprise intended to fly into space The plan for Enterprise was that it would begin life as a glide-worthy test vehicle, used to verify and refine the orbiter concept's ability to make guided runway landings. Once those tests had informed the design of Columbia, OV-102, NASA planned to refit Enterprise to join the formal shuttle fleet as an active spacecraft. Unfortunately, Enterprise did its job too well, pointing out so many necessary design changes for the orbiter space frame that refitting the craft would prove too expensive.Instead, another test vehicle, Structural Test Article STA-099, was easier to flesh out into a full-blown shuttle, taking into account the Enterprise-inspired design upgrades. So, NASA redesignated STA-099 as OV-099 and named it Challenger — and it was this orbiter that took Enterprise's intended place in the shuttle fleet. |
Fra Mauro Member Posts: 1599 From: Bethpage, N.Y. Registered: Jul 2002
|
posted 03-08-2020 02:41 PM
Anyone know what structural changes were made to the orbiters as a result of the drop tests? |