Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Space History Photo of the Week
  Photo of the week 342 (May 21, 2011)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Photo of the week 342 (May 21, 2011)
heng44
Member

Posts: 3387
From: Netherlands
Registered: Nov 2001

posted 05-21-2011 02:52 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for heng44   Click Here to Email heng44     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

With the end of the Space Shuttle program approaching, I selected a series of photos showing two orbiters in one shot. I will post these in the coming weeks.

Columbia (background) and Enterprise at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center, photographed on July 11, 1985. Columbia had just been transported to Dryden from Palmdale for the ferry flight back to Kennedy Space Center, after undergoing modifications.

Ed Hengeveld

Rob Joyner
Member

Posts: 1308
From: GA, USA
Registered: Jan 2004

posted 05-21-2011 03:49 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Rob Joyner   Click Here to Email Rob Joyner     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What a great photo. It looks like an airport!

"Your attention, please. Flight 1701, Shuttle Enterprise, now boarding at Gate 2."

Henry Heatherbank
Member

Posts: 244
From: Adelaide, South Australia
Registered: Apr 2005

posted 05-21-2011 04:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Henry Heatherbank     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The SSMEs in this photograph are interesting. First, Columbia hasn't got any. Second, Enterprise's are clearly not even high fidelity test articles. Anybody know what material these ones were made from?

...also, what was Enterprise doing out on the apron in July 1985? Where had she been? Where was she going?

heng44
Member

Posts: 3387
From: Netherlands
Registered: Nov 2001

posted 05-21-2011 04:47 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for heng44   Click Here to Email heng44     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Enterprise had just returned from Vandenberg AFB, where it was used for fit checks on the launch pad. After this photo it was used for emergency landing rehearsals at Dryden in August 1985.

Philip
Member

Posts: 5952
From: Brussels, Belgium
Registered: Jan 2001

posted 05-21-2011 08:00 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Philip   Click Here to Email Philip     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well, STS lasted for 30 years... that's all.

astro-nut
Member

Posts: 946
From: Washington, IL
Registered: Jan 2006

posted 05-21-2011 08:53 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for astro-nut   Click Here to Email astro-nut     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Another great photo. Thank you for sharing with us on collectSPACE.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 05-21-2011 09:00 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by heng44:
After this photo it was used for emergency landing rehearsals at Dryden in August 1985.
After that, Enterprise was transferred to the Smithsonian (the institution accepted the prototype into the national collection in 1985).

OV-105
Member

Posts: 816
From: Ridgecrest, CA
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 05-21-2011 06:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for OV-105   Click Here to Email OV-105     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Columbia has Enterprise's dummy OMS pods on. They always kept Enterprise outside at Dryden. There was really no space for her in a hanger. I got to see her up close just before this happened on the tour at Dryden. A lot of fun that year going to landings at Edwards and then going to the gift shop to get patches and pins. Thanks Dad I miss you.

dabolton
Member

Posts: 419
From: Seneca, IL, US
Registered: Jan 2009

posted 07-08-2011 04:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for dabolton     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Does the missing engines have an adverse affect on the ferrying process?

OV-105
Member

Posts: 816
From: Ridgecrest, CA
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 07-09-2011 09:15 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for OV-105   Click Here to Email OV-105     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It might help with fuel for the flight since there is less weight on the shuttle. They still have the tailcone on the back end so the air flow is still the same as any other shuttle transport flights. There might be a small CG shift but nothing too big I would think.

dabolton
Member

Posts: 419
From: Seneca, IL, US
Registered: Jan 2009

posted 07-09-2011 11:28 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for dabolton     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks for the response. If they was a CG difference, maybe they would load some internal weight the to carrier plane.

OV-105
Member

Posts: 816
From: Ridgecrest, CA
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 07-09-2011 07:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for OV-105   Click Here to Email OV-105     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I remember that STS-114 was the heaviest ferry flight. They had to add ballast into the crew cabin of the shuttle for the trip back to Florida since the MPLM was so packed.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement