Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Exploration: Moon to Mars
  Thought exercise: Saturn S-IB for Ares first stage

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Thought exercise: Saturn S-IB for Ares first stage
tfrielin
Member

Posts: 162
From: Athens, GA
Registered: Feb 2007

posted 05-27-2009 09:09 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for tfrielin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Recent letters to the editor at Aviation Week and Space Technology have indicated that the Orion spacecraft has grown too heavy for the Ares I and a replacement like a Delta IV is now needed to loft Orion into orbit.

My bona fides as the Retro-Bring-Back-The-Saturns-Guy are well established, so here is a thought experiment for the armchair rocket scientists out there who know how to crunch the numbers on this modest proposal.

I suggest we switch to the Saturn S-IB stage for Orion, only making the new version a mono-tank instead of the nine separate tanks of the original. A common bulkhead fuel and LOX tank would save literally tons off the original first stage weight. Then use the Ares second stage as currently planned.

So, how much payload would a mono-tank Saturn 1B with the Ares upper stage be able to place in LEO?

I believe the largest payload a Saturn 1B lofted was ASTP -- 37,000 pounds into orbit (CSM + docking module).

The Orion CSM weight is currently slated for 45,000 pounds -- that's only 8,000 pounds more than the ASTP payload.

So, how much could a mono-tank Saturn 1B place in orbit? Would the tank streamlining increase the payload capacity by that much?

If not, how much of a stretch of the first stage tanks be required to raise the payload capacty to, say, 50,000 pounds (I'll spot Orion 5,000 pounds for growth weight over the current design)?

This solution would bring back the 8 H-1 engine cluster and thrust structure that would be bolted on to the tankage and there you'd have it -- a first stage for Ares that did not rely on the inelegant use of that hideous SRB.

Thoughts?

Max Q
Member

Posts: 399
From: Whyalla South Australia
Registered: Mar 2007

posted 05-28-2009 12:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Max Q   Click Here to Email Max Q     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Interesting idea. I dare say cost will win over safety again. I hate the use of solids in manned launches.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2023 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement