|
|
Author
|
Topic: NASA Information Summaries: Astronaut Fact Book
|
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 42988 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 01-13-2005 07:11 PM
NASA has updated their Astronaut Fact Book to be current through January 2005. (1.8 Mb PDF) |
eurospace Member Posts: 2610 From: Brussels, Belgium Registered: Dec 2000
|
posted 01-14-2005 03:30 PM
Browsing through the new version of the Astronaut Fact Book, there are number of things I find peculiar: The cleansing of the Russian cosmonauts' career is unacceptable, the omission of the other foreign flyers regrettable, the rest simply very sloppy editing. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 42988 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 01-15-2005 02:04 PM
Some of your concerns are answered in the preface. - International flyers biographies and information: The non-U.S. information presented here was gathered from the biographies provided by the various space agencies with which these individuals are affiliated. So, the absence of biographies may be because the flyer's agency failed to provide one (in a timely manner or otherwise).- Soyuz launches: The space flights and statistics listed in this publication resulted from the vertical takeoff of an American space vehicle or Soyuz taxi flights to the International Space Station. Hence, Thagard's Mir flight is not included. As for Chiao, it may be a situation of when the content was written, as with the retirement/death statistics noted below. - Payload specialists: Payload specialists are career scientists or engineers selected by their employer or country for their expertise in conducting a specific experiment or commercial venture. Information about them is not included in the Astronaut Fact Book. The errors made in retirement and death statistics, as noted above, may in part be a factor of when the content was prepared and "frozen" for publication. (Young's retirement was in planning for some time; Carey's was likely less so.)Finally, in regards to cosmonaut/international astronaut flight statistics being limited to U.S. flights only, the purpose of this document is and has always been to track manned spaceflights as they pertain only to the U.S. space program (which is logical, given that its being published and distributed for free by the U.S. space agency). |
MSS Member Posts: 633 From: Poland Registered: May 2003
|
posted 01-16-2005 02:03 AM
I have some old paper version of this publication starting from 1979 and I can see how it has changed until today!Here are some versions from 1975-82 among Skylab files: find them alone! |
eurospace Member Posts: 2610 From: Brussels, Belgium Registered: Dec 2000
|
posted 01-16-2005 05:06 AM
quote: Originally posted by Robert Pearlman: So, the absence of biographies may be because the flyer's agency failed to provide one (in a timely manner or otherwise).
Actually, incorrect. JSC just got to look onto their own website. Both the information on the Russian cosmonaut biographies and their flight record is there, as are the previous flights of the foreign mission specialists (like Eyharts). Can't they be expected to visit their own website? quote: Hence, Thagard's Mir flight is not included. As for Chiao, it may be a situation of when the content was written, as with the retirement/death statistics noted below.
Actually, if they would have followed their policy on "taxi flights to the International Space Station", they should be mentioned in the text on Foale as on Chiao. They are not - they still got there by the magic stick. Not credible, sorry. And is there any valid reason to deprive poor Norman Thagard (who certainly had the hardest job of all the MIR visitors) from his achievement of being the first US astronaut on a Russian vehicle? Certainly not. The spacecraft Ed Lu used for his long term stay on ISS is mentioned - coherent with the policy you describe. It is not for Foale or Chiao, nor others. Sloppiness for sure, or a deliberate policy to omit the fact that NASA had to use Russian spacecraft to deliver their astronauts to the ISS? Payload specialists are career scientists or engineers selected by their employer or country for their expertise in conducting a specific experiment or commercial venture. Information about them is not included in the Astronaut Fact Book. Fair enough as far as the payload specialists are concerned - their US counterparts are not included either. But you're missing the point entirely: I was talking about the mission specialists. Tognini, Clervoy, Ilan Ramon all were fully qualified mission specialists. The former MS of NASA are listed, the former MS from abroad are not. In other words: incoherent and thus discriminative selection. quote: The errors made in retirement and death statistics, as noted above, may in part be a factor of when the content was prepared and "frozen" for publication.
Then why is Horowitz mentioned as retired, while Carey is not? Both their press releases came out the very same day (if I remember correctly). No, no discrimination here, just sloppy editing. quote: Finally, in regards to cosmonaut/international astronaut flight statistics being limited to U.S. flights only, the purpose of this document is and has always been to track manned spaceflights as they pertain only to the U.S. space program (which is logical, given that its being published and distributed for free by the U.S. space agency).
Absolutely. Norman Thagard is an American astronaut, his flight on Soyuz TM-21 was not a private tourist flight, but on his working time for NASA. Same for the foreign mission specialists: they were trained as mission specialists by NASA, and they flew on shuttle missions. Would you say that Ilan Ramon is not part of the US space history? I don't think you do... but if you did I would find this appalling. |
Tom Member Posts: 1597 From: New York Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 01-16-2005 10:02 AM
Also, I don't see any mention of Canadien astronaut (and STS-85 PS Tryggvason) listed... except for the flight summaries at the very end. |
MSS Member Posts: 633 From: Poland Registered: May 2003
|
posted 01-16-2005 11:11 AM
There is also ISS expedition flights durations at the end of document!(All data is also at my web page ISS crews!) |
MSS Member Posts: 633 From: Poland Registered: May 2003
|
posted 04-12-2013 04:23 PM
Here is the updated version (from April 8, 2013) of the Astronaut Fact Book.It's not perfect, but interesting. |
Henry Heatherbank Member Posts: 244 From: Adelaide, South Australia Registered: Apr 2005
|
posted 04-12-2013 11:16 PM
Just flipping through this and noticed the military rank section. Presumably this lists highest military rank achieved during that person's military career, not just when an astronaut. Edward Givens a Maj. Gen? Is that right? Presumably a posthumous promotion then (much like Scobee to Maj. Gen.) |
Skylon Member Posts: 274 From: Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted 04-13-2013 08:05 AM
I am going to call that entry on Givens a typo, as the biographical sketches section lists him as a Major. I had no clue about Scobee receiving a promotion to Maj. Gen. though. I thought he had retired from active duty, prior to STS 51-L as a Lt. Col. That seems like quite a jump. The only posthumous astronaut promotions I knew of were Mike Smith and Laurel Clark from Navy Commanders to Captains after STS 51-L and 107. One question I have is, why is Deke Slayton listed in his selection section as USAF Reserves? I can guess he was a reservist after he left active duty, when the Air Force grounded him, but when he was selected wasn't he active duty? |
onesmallstep Member Posts: 1310 From: Staten Island, New York USA Registered: Nov 2007
|
posted 04-15-2013 09:35 AM
One more posthumous promotion was Ellison Onizuka's, to full Air Force Colonel. I always assumed Dick Scobee retired from active duty as an Air Force Major, and was also promoted posthumously to Lt. Col., as I found out when I saw his grave marker at Arlington in the '90s. I may be wrong. |
Michael Cassutt Member Posts: 358 From: Studio City CA USA Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted 04-15-2013 12:57 PM
These ranks have to be errors. Slayton was never in the USAF Reserve as far as I know — he was AUS in the 1940s, then, believe he was inactive reserve at the time he tried to return to active duty in 1950, was told he was "nothing". He joined the Air Force then, and while I believe he was a reserve (as opposed to regular) officer for the first few years, he had to have received a regular commission around 1955, long before he became an astronaut. He resigned from the Air Force in November 1963. He was a major at the time. Givens was a major at the time of his death. Scobee had resigned from the Air Force after selection as an astronaut, but prior to his flight on 41-C he retired (had over 20 years of USAF service) as a major. A posthumous promotion to major general is a ludicrous idea. |
p51 Member Posts: 1642 From: Olympia, WA Registered: Sep 2011
|
posted 04-15-2013 06:13 PM
quote: Originally posted by Michael Cassutt: Scobee had resigned from the Air Force after selection as an astronaut, but prior to his flight on 41-C he retired (had over 20 years of USAF service) as a major. A posthumous promotion to major general is a ludicrous idea.
I agree, and it's a moot point anyway as it didn't happen.Still, his son with the same name is a Brigadier General ("one star general" for you civilian types), I guess it's always possible there was an error along those lines? I chalk it up to government employee handling...
| |
Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts
Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a
|
|
|
advertisement
|