posted 03-21-2007 12:36 PM
About the film: some fool stentoriously proclaims how Earth would unite because the next war would be interplanetary, but that was a direct word-for-word rip from Ronald Reagan made without any attribution. What does THAT say about the credibility of any other audio like from Discovery? The DP used the word "critter", which was a common term from the Colorado of his (early 20th Century) youth and well understood by those at NASA he was addressing (who were also country boys of similar age). So now it's pulled out of context and given a sinister connotation. (PS: "sinister" is just means "left")
I always considered it improbable that a craft capable of navigating over interstellar distances and surviving radiation, space debris, heat, cold, vacuum while providing life support systems for decades would come to New Mexico and crash because it got tangled up in some telephone wires.
I also think it's a colossal act of ego, as well as self-delusion of Biblical proportions, to suggest that Earth in general or humans in particular hold some fascination for the dudes in Flying Saucers.
On the other hand, considering some of the beeswax people get up to, we're probably the best free show in the Known Universe.
Continuing along that line of "thought", any species intelligent to fly across Outer Space will quickly determine that rather than hang around hovering above Stanton Friedman's place or over Ipanema like that famous UFO photo, a visit to Monkey Island at the Zoo will tell them everything they need to know about human culture and behavior.
That being said, I can tell you as a matter of absolute fact that if I had a Flying Saucer I'd DEFINATELY use it to hover over a beach in Brazil and make a few covert observations. I'd want to be sure I could give a complete report to the folks back on my home world about the phenomenon of human females playing volleyball while wearing somewhat scanty bathing costumes.
[Edited by Duke Of URL (March 21, 2007).]