Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Mercury - Gemini - Apollo
  Gemini module jettison and re-entry

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Gemini module jettison and re-entry
Headshot
Member

Posts: 891
From: Vancouver, WA, USA
Registered: Feb 2012

posted 08-03-2018 12:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Headshot   Click Here to Email Headshot     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
When a Gemini mission was done, the crew ejected the equipment module which had batteries/fuel cells, propellant and oxygen. Then the retrorockets were fired.

What if the retros did not fire? Were they screwed? After all they just got rid of the lion's share of their life-supporting goodies. The re-entry module life-support supplies had to be minimal, at best.

I do not believe the RCS system on the re-entry module had the capability to de-orbit them. So were they stuck in orbit until their onboard supplies ran out?

Fra Mauro
Member

Posts: 1624
From: Bethpage, N.Y.
Registered: Jul 2002

posted 08-03-2018 02:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Fra Mauro   Click Here to Email Fra Mauro     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Basically, you are correct. I do not know how long the batteries on the Gemini reentry module would last but I doubt it would be more than 24 hours. On the positive side, the retro rockets were solid fuel, which were simple and reliable.

John Charles
Member

Posts: 342
From: Houston, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 08-04-2018 09:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for John Charles     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The possibility of a failure in the Gemini retrorockets became a serious concern to NASA managers after the publication of "Marooned" by Martin Caidin. That story about the failure of retrorockets on a Mercury capsule to fire alarmed NASA about that possibility on Gemini.

Procedures were modified very late before Gemini 3 to deorbit using the thrusters in the equipment module before it was jettisoned, then to fire the retrorockets too. This was done on Gemini 3 and 4. At that point, everyone decided that the retrorockets were reliable enough to depend on, and the two-step deorbit was discontinued.

Headshot
Member

Posts: 891
From: Vancouver, WA, USA
Registered: Feb 2012

posted 08-04-2018 11:53 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Headshot   Click Here to Email Headshot     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks John.

I did not realize that Gemini 4 used the two-step de-orbit procedure like Gemini 3.

I seem to recall that the fourth retro-rocket on Gemini 5 fired noticeably late. Do you know if an explanation was ever developed for that?

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement