Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Mercury - Gemini - Apollo
  Gemini 4: Decision to undetake EVA (spacewalk)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Gemini 4: Decision to undetake EVA (spacewalk)
Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 43576
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 06-01-2015 05:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Fifty years ago Wednesday (June 3), astronaut Ed White became the first American to walk in space, exiting the Gemini 4 spacecraft for a 20 minute extravehicular activity (EVA).

When was the decision to go EVA made? The Gemini 4 press kit, published on May 21, 1965, advises:

No decision has been made whether in the Gemini 4 mission the crew will engage in extravehicular activity. This will depend on the qualifying of the extravehicular space suits and the hatch.

A decision to undertake the extravehicular test can be made as late as the day before the launch.

At their pre-launch press conference, the crew still spoke as though the spacewalk wasn't certain, or even that it would be anything more than a stand-up EVA:
McDivitt: "Ed White will probably be the standee and I probably will hold onto him."

White: "Yes, I am the standee and he is the holdee."

Gene Kranz says in his book "Failure is Not an Option" that "we only one final week of training when the word came down from headquarters: "We are GO for EVA." But when specifically was that?

ColinBurgess
Member

Posts: 2043
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2003

posted 06-01-2015 07:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ColinBurgess   Click Here to Email ColinBurgess     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This is an extract from a telephone interview I conducted with Jim McDivitt back in January 2005:
CB: Okay. First of all, plans two months ahead of Gemini 5 called for the possibility of a crewmember poking his head out of the hatch. Was it always going to be Ed’s job, or was consideration given to you doing the stand-up EVA?

JM: Well, when we first started we both did it all together. I mean, he’d practice something and I’d practice something, so we just went along in parallel like that. Then by the time we got around to doing it, it was one of those things where I was the commander and that was a full-time job, and so I talked it over with the other powers around NASA and we decided Ed ought to do it.

CB: When and how did you find out that Ed was going to conduct a full EVA?

JM: Well, you know, I don’t think there were any plans ahead of time for us to stick our heads out the hatch; I don’t think that was the case. I don’t remember that – it was forty years ago – but, the way I remember it; we were going along and we thought we ought to do a – you know, there was no planned EVA whatsoever on that flight. It was a four day flight, and we, nobody had really been talking about doing an EVA at all on any of the missions, as far as I know, and then very secretly somebody decided we ought to try one, so Ed and I practiced at night, and we did all the EVA stuff real late in the evening. We did discover early on that the seat was not quite the right height, so we had to do some modifications to the seats so we could make sure we could get the guys back in the spacecraft. We did it all very secretive; even … nobody in the Astronaut Office knew we were doing it.

And then, a week or so before the flight – or maybe it was two weeks or so before the flight – the Russians did one, so we were really planning on doing the first one, but they beat us to the punch. To the best of my knowledge, there weren’t any plans to do an EVA on any Gemini flight up until the time we started on ours. And the equipment that we used was sort of developed for Ed and I on an air table, trying to figure out how we can make that little hand gun work and stuff.

Headshot
Member

Posts: 891
From: Vancouver, WA, USA
Registered: Feb 2012

posted 06-01-2015 07:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Headshot   Click Here to Email Headshot     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
As info, the 24 May 1965 issue of AW&ST does not mention the EVA. The 31 May 1965 issue devotes a full page to it and mentions that NASA announced it "last week." The UPI book, "Gemini America's Historic Walk In Space," gives the date as May 25 near the end of Chapter One (There are no page numbers in this book!). The book is unclear if that date refers to the decision being made, or announced to the public.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 43576
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 06-01-2015 07:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks Colin. McDivitt's account would seem to be a bit at odds with his own pre-launch comments but as he told you, "it was forty years ago." (And now 50.)

Media reports contemporary to the mission suggest a stand-up EVA would precede a full spacewalk up until Gemini 4 launched with the "Go for EVA." McDivitt's and White's comments about "standee" and "holdee" made the headlines in June 1965.

quote:
Originally posted by Headshot:
The book is unclear if that date refers to the decision being made, or announced to the public.
May 25 would work with Kranz's schedule of a week before...

David C
Member

Posts: 1039
From: Lausanne
Registered: Apr 2012

posted 06-02-2015 01:42 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for David C     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
JM: To the best of my knowledge, there weren’t any plans to do an EVA on any Gemini flight up until the time we started on ours. And the equipment that we used was sort of developed for Ed and I on an air table, trying to figure out how we can make that little hand gun work and stuff.
Very interesting Colin but Jim is incorrect on the last part at least. Mike Collins was the astronaut office EVA rep and comments in his book on the affair.

schnappsicle
Member

Posts: 396
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Jan 2012

posted 06-02-2015 07:38 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for schnappsicle   Click Here to Email schnappsicle     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I think Collins' involvement in Gemini 4 was due to the fact that his astronaut specialty was in spacesuits and EVA. As an expert in the field, he had to be on hand for the training.

While I can't speak for him, I'm sure what McDivitt meant was that the non-flight personnel (prime and backups) were not informed of the EVA decision or the on-going training involved. Still, it strikes me odd that someone didn't notice that McDivitt, White, Borman and Lovell were in town but rarely seen at JSC during the day, or did they work long hours?

From what little I remember, I think the original Gemini 4 flight plan called for White do just a standup. The decision to send Ed out on a full-blown EVA was a direct response to Leonov's EVA on March 19th. At least that's what I remember reading. I'm not saying that's when the decision was made, but it makes sense that it was made sometime shortly thereafter, even if it wasn't announced until 9 weeks later.

The one thing I don't understand is that if EVA was such an important goal of the Gemini program, why were there no EVAs between Gemini 4 and Gemini 9? I understand the problem with Gemini 8, but why no EVA on 5, 6, or 7? I think there was talk about transferring astronauts (Stafford and Lovell) between Gemini 6 and 7, or maybe that was just media speculation. Either way, that idea was quickly squashed. It would have been a fun thing to see though, regardless of the danger involved. I think if Conrad, Lovell, and maybe even Stafford, had been able to go outside and perform a few simple tasks, Cernan, Collins and Gordon's EVA's would have been far more successful. They tried to do too much too fast.

The Gemini EVAs were sold to us as a necessary step to lunar exploration. While that's true in some respects, the real benefits weren't realized until 30 years later when we started repairing Hubble and building the ISS. That's quite a legacy they left to mankind.

onesmallstep
Member

Posts: 1313
From: Staten Island, New York USA
Registered: Nov 2007

posted 06-02-2015 09:32 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for onesmallstep   Click Here to Email onesmallstep     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I think the goals for Gemini - multi-crew flight; long-duration missions; rendezvous and docking; and EVA were all accomplished incrementally and successfully by the end of the program. Keep in mind, although it was a 'space race' with the Soviets, safety was also a priority.

If the first American EVA had been put off until Gemini 5, it would have likely been done early in the flight's planned eight-day mission. Also on that flight, a rendezvous with a passive target was planned as well. That led to the original Gemini 6 flight to rendezvous/dock with an Agena, until as is known a chase and rendezvous with Gemini 7 was done.

And it's unlikely any EVA would have been done on Gemini 7, as both astronauts used a new, lightweight space suit unsuitable for any outside EVA. Even if Lovell had gone out, it would have been one crowded cabin for the remainder of the long-duration mission with both men having to wear bulkier regular Gemini suits.

Which brings us to Gemini 8: if things had gone as planned, Scott probably would have accomplished most of the tasks on his EVA, and even if there had been problems, things would have been worked out and modified on the ground so the subsequent missions would have accomplished all of the goals. Keep in mind EVA was fairly new, and the underwater training taken for granted for Skylab, Shuttle and ISS were not yet worked out.

David C
Member

Posts: 1039
From: Lausanne
Registered: Apr 2012

posted 06-02-2015 09:47 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for David C     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
My reference is "Carrying The Fire". Since it was published less than ten years after the events in question, I think it's generally more reliable than less considered remarks made forty or fifty years later.
quote:
Originally posted by schnappsicle:
I think Collins' involvement in Gemini 4 was due to the fact that his astronaut specialty was in spacesuits and EVA. As an expert in the field, he had to be on hand for the training.
Well no, part of my point is that Collins was not involved, and as the astronaut office rep that quote "rankled considerably," which seems reasonable. According to Collins, the final decision was only made ten days prior to the flight.

EVA was an objective of Project Gemini but it was very much a poor relation when compared to rendezvous and long duration flight. Bottom line is that most at NASA thought it would be pretty easy, just put on a suit and open the door. White's EVA added to that perception. Until pretty much Gemini 12, EVA experiences were not fully communicated to follow on crews and each EVA astronaut was surprised, a failing in project management.

As for why no EVAs between 4 and 8; remember that White's EVA on 4 was pulled forward a long way in Gemini plans after Voshkod 2 purely as a PR exercise. It was still very early days and they wanted to limit how much they bit off on each flight. Four was originally "long duration" (compared to what America had done before) and rendezvous (which didn't go well and is conveniently ignored thanks to White's EVA). You didn't really want all the extra EVA kit in the cockpit of a long duration flight, and with the suits on 7 EVA was impossible. Six (originally GTA-6) was dedicated to rendezvous and docking. No way Schirra was letting anything else onboard. So eight was really the first planned opportunity.

Tom
Member

Posts: 1610
From: New York
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 06-02-2015 02:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tom   Click Here to Email Tom     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I remember reading some where that Schirra actually flip-flopped his thoughts on EVA for Gemini 6 when it became a joint mission with Gemini 7. However, Borman wanted nothing to do with EVA and the idea was dropped.

Fra Mauro
Member

Posts: 1624
From: Bethpage, N.Y.
Registered: Jul 2002

posted 06-02-2015 05:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Fra Mauro   Click Here to Email Fra Mauro     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Two books, Deke and On the Shoulders of Titans, both say May 25th was the day the EVA was approved.

space1
Member

Posts: 861
From: Danville, Ohio
Registered: Dec 2002

posted 06-02-2015 06:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for space1   Click Here to Email space1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
For Gemini, exchanging astronauts between spacecraft by EVA would have been a major headache. For example, the seats had personalized backboards and pelvic blocks. It would not have worked to try to exchange those along with the astronaut.

McDivitt mentions the seats had to be modified. I would sure like to know specific details about that.

schnappsicle
Member

Posts: 396
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Jan 2012

posted 06-03-2015 08:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for schnappsicle   Click Here to Email schnappsicle     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by David C:
Until pretty much Gemini 12, EVA experiences were not fully communicated to follow on crews and each EVA astronaut was surprised, a failing in project management.
I asked Richard Gordon that very question. He said he was briefed by Cernan and Collins prior to his Gemini 11 EVA. What Gordon told me was that even with the added knowledge gained from the 2 prior EVAs, there wasn't time to add any additional restraints to the spacecraft (Gemini or Agena). His only chance of success was to try to do the tasks (procedures) differently than his predecessors, both in training and in space. Obviously, that failed as well.

I think that part of the problem they had with Gemini EVAs, in addition to lack of proper training, was the inadequate space suits that didn't provide adequate cooling for the environment.

Spoon
Member

Posts: 148
From: Cumbria, UK
Registered: May 2006

posted 06-03-2015 11:07 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Spoon   Click Here to Email Spoon     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The indispensable book "The History of Manned Spaceflight" by David Baker gives a superb account of all the discussions (with dates) that took place within NASA leading up to that decision on the 25th May.

Delta7
Member

Posts: 1527
From: Bluffton IN USA
Registered: Oct 2007

posted 06-08-2015 10:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Delta7   Click Here to Email Delta7     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Did Jim Lovell do any EVA training as White's backup?

onesmallstep
Member

Posts: 1313
From: Staten Island, New York USA
Registered: Nov 2007

posted 06-09-2015 08:36 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for onesmallstep   Click Here to Email onesmallstep     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I see in the Gemini history "On the Shoulders of Titans," the comment (Ch.11): "...the Gemini IV crews (plural) began training for EVA." Things were beginning to firm up by the start of 1965, with Bob Gilruth approving altitude chamber tests barely a week before Leonov's walk aboard Voskhod 2. And it made sense that Lovell, as White's backup, would receive the same training.

Mike Dixon
Member

Posts: 1428
From: Kew, Victoria, Australia
Registered: May 2003

posted 06-10-2015 07:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mike Dixon   Click Here to Email Mike Dixon     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If, for any reason, the Borman/Lovell crew had flown Gemini 4, would they still have held their assignment to Gemini 7?

Delta7
Member

Posts: 1527
From: Bluffton IN USA
Registered: Oct 2007

posted 06-10-2015 08:40 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Delta7   Click Here to Email Delta7     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Probably not. If McDivitt and White were temporarily unable to fly necessitating replacement by the backup crew, I would think they would have been re-assigned to GT-7. If they had fallen victim to some tragic accident, such as in a T-38, other crews would have moved up in the schedule. (Armstrong/See moving up as backups to Borman and Lovell on GT-4 and flying GT-7 perhaps?). Similar to what happened after the See/Bassett accident.

Mike Dixon
Member

Posts: 1428
From: Kew, Victoria, Australia
Registered: May 2003

posted 06-10-2015 10:51 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mike Dixon   Click Here to Email Mike Dixon     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I suspected as much ... and thank you

LM-12
Member

Posts: 3324
From: Ontario, Canada
Registered: Oct 2010

posted 06-29-2015 07:58 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for LM-12     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
In April 1965, the mission plan for Gemini 6 included an EVA by Tom Stafford. From the Space News Roundup on April 16:
The GTA-6 mission which will perform rendezvous and docking maneuvers and extravehicular activities, will have as its prime crew Astronauts Walter M. Schirra Jr. and Thomas P. Stafford...

Stafford, named to perform the extravehicular portion of the flight, said that after depressurization of the spacecraft and opening the hatch, he would egress into space on a tether line and retrieve a micrometeorite experiment from the exterior of the spacecraft, and also take some photographs. A depressurization and stand-up maneuver is scheduled for GT-5...

The mission of the GT-6 and the Agena is scheduled for the early part of 1966.

Gemini 6 was the first mission planned to include rendezvous, docking and EVA. Gemini 10 was the first mission to actually achieve that.

On July 12, MSC was informed by NASA HQ that EVA activity would be deleted from the Gemini 5, 6 and 7 missions. So, there was no EVA scheduled for the Gemini 6 mission that was scrubbed on October 25 when the Atlas-Agena target vehicle failed to reach orbit.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement