Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Mercury - Gemini - Apollo
  No Go for Seven Orbits?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   No Go for Seven Orbits?
KC Stoever
Member

Posts: 1012
From: Denver, CO USA
Registered: Oct 2002

posted 03-08-2006 11:18 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for KC Stoever   Click Here to Email KC Stoever     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Was reading over at the
http://www.thespacereview.com/article/550/1

where Jim Oberg, BTW, has a good retrospective on Walter Cronkite. There Dwayne Day tackles an urban legend regarding John Glenn's flight, which some books say, erroneously, was supposed to go seven orbits--but a supposed malfunction of his heatshield (never happened) meant he could only go three. Whoa.

Both MA-6 and MA-7 pilots were told after liftoff, "We have a Go, with a 7-orbit capability."

Carpenter explains that this merely indicated an optimal trajectory, at launch. Go for 7 was "the best report you could get. The injection trajectory could only be measured [by 1962 computers] downstream for 7 orbits. This was the best," Carpenter explains, "the programmed computer could do."

Friendship 7 and Aurora 7 were always meant to be three-orbit flights.

Hawkman
Member

Posts: 400
From: Union, New Jersey
Registered: Jan 2001

posted 03-15-2006 07:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Hawkman   Click Here to Email Hawkman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
But...but...in the movie The Right Stuff we see 'Shepard' say that ' You are go, at least seven orbits''

I mean..they couldn't put something like that on film if it weren't true, could they?


Blackarrow
Member

Posts: 3160
From: Belfast, United Kingdom
Registered: Feb 2002

posted 03-15-2006 08:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Blackarrow     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hawkman,
That simply meant that the orbit was stable enough to allow seven orbits. The mission was never intended to last more than three orbits.

Hawkman
Member

Posts: 400
From: Union, New Jersey
Registered: Jan 2001

posted 03-17-2006 09:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Hawkman   Click Here to Email Hawkman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Blackarrow:
Hawkman,
That simply meant that the orbit was stable enough to allow seven orbits. The mission was never intended to last more than three orbits.

Note the smile at the end of the post. I was kidding.

Blackarrow
Member

Posts: 3160
From: Belfast, United Kingdom
Registered: Feb 2002

posted 03-18-2006 08:50 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Blackarrow     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hawkman,
Point taken - it was late at night and my intellectual powers were on the slide!

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement