Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Mercury - Gemini - Apollo
  Kennedy Moon speeches

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Kennedy Moon speeches
DavidH
Member

Posts: 1217
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Jun 2003

posted 04-29-2004 01:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DavidH   Click Here to Email DavidH     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
For someone who remembers:
There's been a lot of talk about Bush's lack of outspokenness about the Exploration Initiative since the Jan. 14 announcement.
Of course, the frame of reference for bold exploration speeches is always JFK.
40 years later, we still remember two of his speeches about sending man to the Moon:
"I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the Earth."
"We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard."
The former, of course, was before a joint session of Congress in May 1962.
The second was at Rice University in September--almost 4 months later.
My question is, how much did Kennedy talk about the Moon on other occassions?

------------------
http://www.hatbag.net/blog.html
"America's challenge of today has forged man's destiny of tomorrow." - Commander Eugene Cernan, Apollo 17 Mission, 11 December 1972

KC Stoever
Member

Posts: 1012
From: Denver, CO USA
Registered: Oct 2002

posted 04-29-2004 02:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for KC Stoever   Click Here to Email KC Stoever     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Good question. I've had research success simply googling the keywords "JFK presidential address moon landing" or similar combinations.

Another place to start is the JFK Presidential Library, which has a good online site at:
http://www.cs.umb.edu/jfklibrary/speeches.htm

It contains the text of all JFK speeches. See also JFK's many press conferences, same site.

In addition, the JFK Library is declassifying Oval Office national security and NASA meetings.

See Scott Carpenter's memoir, FOR SPACIOUS SKIES, for analysis of one notably testy showdown (November 1962) between JFK and NASA administrator James Webb--after the Rice University speech, where Webb was on the dais applauding! Analysis of that meeting is based on the declassified transcript, where Webb can be heard waffling on the lunar program (" . . . one of many priorities.").

Webb's remark clearly annoyed JFK (as is evident from the tapes), who snapped at Webb. The lunar program was NASA's "top priority."

You can request a tape, free of charge, from the library.

In public, JFK sounded resonant themes about exploring the universe. In private with his policy advisors, he was a unsentimental cold warrior using NASA as just one arrow in his quiver in efforts to bring down the Soviet bear.

[This message has been edited by KC Stoever (edited April 29, 2004).]

Matt T
Member

Posts: 1369
From: Chester, Cheshire, UK
Registered: May 2001

posted 04-29-2004 05:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Matt T   Click Here to Email Matt T     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I've often wondered about the image of Kennedy as a man who 'turned-on' his enthusiasm for the moon program when it suited him.

Might he not have been a man with a genuine unfeigned passion who turned it off when it suited him politically? Starry eyed dreaming may have worked for the public but wouldn't have impressed career politicians.

I think it's equally possible Kennedy chose to justify his personal interests to his advisers with convenient political angles.

Of course I don't know, but I feel it is a valid alternative reading of the events, one that chimes with Tom Wolfe's account of Kennedy's genuine enthusiasm for the astronauts themselves.

Cheers,
Matt

[This message has been edited by Matt T (edited April 29, 2004).]

KC Stoever
Member

Posts: 1012
From: Denver, CO USA
Registered: Oct 2002

posted 04-29-2004 05:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for KC Stoever   Click Here to Email KC Stoever     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Matt,

You make a good point, about politicians "turning on and off" about key national policies. Yet it makes sense to observe that presidents are politicians in addition to being leaders and, as a consequence, must make calculated decisions based on changing domestic and geopolitical facts.

Recall too that in 1961 NASA was a federal orphan when JFK came to power. It remained an orphan until two, really three or four, thundering events occurred nearly simultaneously that spring:

(1) the Bay of Pigs; (2) Gagarin's flight;(3) the erection of the Berlin Wall and the Vienna Summit between Khrushchev and Kennedy; and(4) Al Shepard's historic flight.

The Kennedy administration took an international pounding in April 1961 for its failed military invasion in communist Cuba. Then a communist Gagarin scored a spectacular space first with his flight.

JFK then had a personally shattering meeting, in Vienna, one on one, with the Soviet premier, a meeting that left him looking into the thermonuclear abyss.

As it happened, however, upon JFK's return to the States, Shepard made his flight, at Gilruth's heroic insistence in the face of resistance from a hidebound, anti-NASA science advisory board.

Gilruth was right. The WH science advisory board was wrong. Shepard's flight was met with spontaneous and delirious joy among the (voting) public.

Voila! NASA found a father, in a young president who desperately needed a popular and prestigious national program and a ringing national and geopolitical goal.

Kennedy responded in three ways to Shepard's historic flight: First, on a political cold war level, Kennedy realized he could use NASA to fight a proxy science and technology war with the USSR.

Second, as a political leader, JFK sought to inspire Americans to support the space program. Hence his resonant speeches about "this new ocean," mentioned above.

Third, yes, on a personal level, Kennedy liked the seven astronauts. He couldn't help himself. He was grateful--personally, as an American, and, politically, as the president. The Mercury astronauts personified rather photogenically his vision of space exploration--really, the long-term lunar landings and the long-term plan to destroy a cold war foe.

The astronauts were political gold.

The only real geopolitical calculation, I think, was Kennedy's sense that he might use American longing for greatness--exemplified by space exporation--as a way to gull the Soviets into responding in kind. Which country would be greater? that was the question.

In the process, Kennedy hoped the Soviets would end up bankrupting their rickety domestic economy by pouring resources into a prestigious but ultimately insupportable space program.

This overarching strategic and political goal explains JFK's distinct annoyance (so audible on the tapes) with Webb, who just didn't get it.

[This message has been edited by KC Stoever (edited April 29, 2004).]

[This message has been edited by KC Stoever (edited April 29, 2004).]

dss65
Member

Posts: 1171
From: Sandpoint, ID, USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 04-29-2004 11:05 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for dss65   Click Here to Email dss65     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Wow, what an enlightening analysis. Thank you. (This is an example of why this is such a great place to "go" every evening.)

------------------
Don

Rob Joyner
Member

Posts: 1308
From: GA, USA
Registered: Jan 2004

posted 04-30-2004 02:00 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Rob Joyner   Click Here to Email Rob Joyner     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Who knows what Kennedy was really thinking?
It was a race, no doubt, but he did visit KSC just before going to Dallas in Nov.'63.
I really think history may have taken another turn had he not gone to Dallas that day...

KC Stoever
Member

Posts: 1012
From: Denver, CO USA
Registered: Oct 2002

posted 04-30-2004 12:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for KC Stoever   Click Here to Email KC Stoever     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Rob,

On the contrary. It's a pretty simple matter given the documentary wealth particularly on the Kennedy administration and on NASA. Private conversations, recorded and transcribed, policy papers, press conferences, speeches.

And of course actions, which speak louder than these many words. Kennedy's actions spoke reams.

DavidH
Member

Posts: 1217
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Jun 2003

posted 05-06-2004 11:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for DavidH   Click Here to Email DavidH     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Here's an interesting article along these lines, on the similarities between the Bush and Kennedy plans and their announcements.
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20040503-063307-8349r

------------------
http://www.hatbag.net/blog.html
"America's challenge of today has forged man's destiny of tomorrow." - Commander Eugene Cernan, Apollo 17 Mission, 11 December 1972

spaceman1953
Member

Posts: 953
From: South Bend, IN
Registered: Apr 2002

posted 05-19-2004 07:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for spaceman1953   Click Here to Email spaceman1953     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
One of the more interesting "funny" coincidental things about our space programs history.....
JFK started this whole Moonlanding thing, but Richard Nixon (they guy he beat for the White House) was President when the moonlandings happened.

LunarRover
Member

Posts: 95
From: N. California
Registered: Nov 2003

posted 05-19-2004 09:25 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for LunarRover   Click Here to Email LunarRover     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by spaceman1953:

JFK started this whole Moonlanding thing, but Richard Nixon (they guy he beat for the White House) was President when the moonlandings happened.

[/B]



I believe I read that President Nixon made a choice to use the USS Hornet (a fine vessel), instead of a ship named after JFK, as the prime recovery ship. Is that the case/can anyone corroborate?

Sometime later, history records that he resigned his presidency. Before that he said, "I am not a crook".

Legacy complete?

Rover
kosb

Aztecdoug
Member

Posts: 1405
From: Huntington Beach
Registered: Feb 2000

posted 05-19-2004 11:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Aztecdoug   Click Here to Email Aztecdoug     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by LunarRover:

I believe I read that President Nixon made a choice to use the USS Hornet (a fine vessel), instead of a ship named after JFK, as the prime recovery ship. Is that the case/can anyone corroborate?

Rover
kosb


This is a partisan myth. The John F. Kennedy served in the Med., North Atlantic etc... In fact it has never been to the Pacific Ocean at all to date. But in any event it began service in late 1968 and was first deployed April of 1969 until December of 1969 in the Med.
http://navysite.de/cvn/cv67deploy.htm

------------------
Warm Regards

Douglas Henry

Enjoy yourself and have fun.... it is only a hobby!

[This message has been edited by Aztecdoug (edited May 20, 2004).]

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement