Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Space Events & Happenings
  Launch Scrub

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Launch Scrub
spacegrl13
Member

Posts: 122
From: Portland, Oregon, U.S.
Registered: Aug 2002

posted 07-13-2005 12:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for spacegrl13   Click Here to Email spacegrl13     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If the shuttle can't fly today does anyone know when it would be slated to fly next or how long it would take to fix the particular problem.
cheers,
Helen

zee_aladdin
Member

Posts: 781
From: California
Registered: Oct 2004

posted 07-13-2005 12:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for zee_aladdin   Click Here to Email zee_aladdin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The shuttle launch has been scrubbed while I was switching channels between the NASA channel and A&E Star Wars 'Empire of Dreams' (the making of Star Wars).... very interesting watching science fiction and real science.

I did make a comment that the shuttle should not fly on the 13th ... was a coincidence or something else. Now one will ever know.

I hope the Shuttle flies very soon ... I CANT WAIT

michaelSN99
Member

Posts: 153
From: heilbronn,germany
Registered: Apr 2005

posted 07-13-2005 01:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for michaelSN99   Click Here to Email michaelSN99     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
helen,

the problem with the fuel sensor cannot be investigated od even fixed with propellants in the tanks, wich have to be drained first.

so there is no idea how long the launch delay will be , at this time.

------------------
michael may www.ag-99.de/spacenet/main/main.html

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42986
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 07-13-2005 01:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The failure was with the LH2 ECO Sensor #2. The sensors presently shows 'WET' with the tank full. At ~L-3 hours, a test command is sent to transition the sensors from WET to DRY to check the sensors out. Sensor #2 failed to transition to DRY. This is in violation of the launch criteria (basically, we are NO GO if there is anything anomalous with these sensors, failed hard, intermittent or transient).

Madon_space
Member

Posts: 667
From: uk
Registered: Sep 2002

posted 07-13-2005 01:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Madon_space   Click Here to Email Madon_space     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Very Very disappointing but as always safety of the crew must come first, can't imagine how the whole Nasa Team must feel in situations like this.

Maybe tomorrow

------------------
Best Wishes
ROB
http://hometown.aol.com/robc2412/madonspace.html

Dwight
Member

Posts: 576
From: Germany
Registered: Dec 2003

posted 07-13-2005 01:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dwight   Click Here to Email Dwight     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Bummer...well I didn't dispair, as I took out the Apollo 17 DVD and watched that launch instead, albeit with a significant delay...

Here's hoping a laaunch of STS114 happens soon!!!

Dwight

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42986
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 07-13-2005 01:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The crew has left the vehicle and are on their way back to their quarters. Depending on the preliminary findings of the trouble shooting teams, the crew may stay in Florida or choose to return to Houston until such time another launch attempt can be made.

A press conference has been called for no earlier than 4:30pm EDT depending on what information is known at that time.

zee_aladdin
Member

Posts: 781
From: California
Registered: Oct 2004

posted 07-13-2005 01:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for zee_aladdin   Click Here to Email zee_aladdin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanx for the detailed info, Robert. Anything that has to do with FUEL is always a critical issue.

zee_aladdin
Member

Posts: 781
From: California
Registered: Oct 2004

posted 07-13-2005 01:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for zee_aladdin   Click Here to Email zee_aladdin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I am now watching the 60 minutes documentary of the last Columbia crew on the Science Channel, and all the training they had to go through.

michaelSN99
Member

Posts: 153
From: heilbronn,germany
Registered: Apr 2005

posted 07-13-2005 01:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for michaelSN99   Click Here to Email michaelSN99     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
additional a statement by Dave Wolf explaining how the questionable sensor works and why its critical during the sacent of the shuttle:

"We really don't want the engine to be running at high speed and suddenly run out of fuel. That can lead to a devastating breakdown of the engine, even uncontained failure of the engine if that should happen. Therefore, we have four sensors on the vehicle and it requires two of those to detect a low-level fuel in order to cut off the engines early before they would run out. This only comes into play in special conditions on the ascent, not a nominal ascent, so it's essentially a backup for a backup situation.
Even though the odds of needing this sensor are low, very low, in the proper spirit of safety to any really feasible or projectable failure we want a full system, certainly at the point of launch."

source: spaceflightnow

------------------
michael may www.ag-99.de/spacenet/main/main.html

John McGauley
Member

Posts: 151
From: Fort Wayne, Indiana USA
Registered: May 2001

posted 07-13-2005 02:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for John McGauley   Click Here to Email John McGauley     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This sounds just like the issue that caused the rollback and tank switch. Anyone know if that's the case? If so, certainly makes one want to question to decision not to do a tanking test on this new one.

michaelSN99
Member

Posts: 153
From: heilbronn,germany
Registered: Apr 2005

posted 07-13-2005 02:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for michaelSN99   Click Here to Email michaelSN99     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
John,

some more informations and much more questions you can read in another posting here ;-) :
http://collectspace.com/ubb/Forum30/HTML/000165.html

------------------
michael may www.ag-99.de/spacenet/main/main.html

november25
Member

Posts: 646
From: Douglas, Isle of Man, UK
Registered: Feb 2004

posted 07-13-2005 05:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for november25   Click Here to Email november25     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Its a very great shame about the fuel sensor. The same goes-for when I fly a plane. if I see a Red Light,indicating a
Malfunction on the instrument panel-then I would scub take off- T his is why the same applies to the Space Shuttle instruments-once a pre-flight check has been made,and this is indicated-then No Way-its a go-unless an electrical fault-My Quote on safety- [I WILL NOT FLY THE PLANE-if there is a red light-} BETTER TO BE SAFE-THEN SORRY-after take off.
I expect other pilots on cs board will agree.
All the best to the ST S114 team-better luck next time.
regards from Brenda.
this was posted by november25.

lb206
Member

Posts: 48
From:
Registered: Jul 2005

posted 07-13-2005 09:09 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for lb206   Click Here to Email lb206     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well the flight is scheduled for no earlier than Saturday we will know more tommorow afternoon after they drain the tank and look at the situation from there tonight and tommorow morning. They said they should have some idea of the work involved by tommorow afternoon and whether or not it will require another rollback and scrub till september.

HouseDadX4
unregistered
posted 07-15-2005 09:46 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Looks as though an attempt on Sunday is a No-Go..This story is posted at Florida Today.com

Discovery tanks drained; no try Sunday

Sensor trouble may take weeks to locate, repair

BY TODD HALVORSON
and CHRIS KRIDLER

CAPE CANAVERAL - NASA engineers drained the tanks onboard Discovery that hold liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen for the shuttle's fuel cell system early today, a move that means the agency will not be making a launch attempt Sunday.

We expect an announcement later today on what the new earliest possible launch date is for the first mission since Columbia.

The fuel cell system generates electricity to power all spaceship systems during flight. The tanks are located beneath the lining of the shuttle's 60-foot-long cargo bay.

Mission managers had said Thursday that it was unlikely engineers would be able to find and fix a problem with fuel gauges in the shuttle's external tank in time to launch Sunday.

The off-loading of liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen from the fuel cell tanks, meanwhile, puts NASA in a position where the agency would not be able to complete all work necessary to have Discovery ready to launch on Sunday.

Engineers are meeting at Kennedy Space Center now to plot out a fuel gauge troubleshooting plan. A technical review of the plan is scheduled for 12:30 p.m. The Mission Management Team will meet at 3:30 p.m. to decide on a course of action.

A news conference will be held after the management team meeting.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement