Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Hardware & Flown Items
  Recovered pre-shuttle booster sections

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Recovered pre-shuttle booster sections
music_space
Member

Posts: 1179
From: Canada
Registered: Jul 2001

posted 12-27-2002 11:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for music_space   Click Here to Email music_space     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Roughing out a flu with On The Shoulders of Titans, NASA's SP-4203 (a gift from Glen Swanson, space historian, author, and editor of SP-4223), I was looking at a picture at page 261: "5-meter segment of Gemini V booster being recovered from the Atlantic -- first large section to be recovered".

Anyone knows if any such artefacts are shown anywhere (or were offered for private acquisition)?

Ben Watson
Member

Posts: 24
From: Jackson, MS USA
Registered: Dec 2002

posted 12-30-2002 04:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ben Watson   Click Here to Email Ben Watson     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Back in the mid-80's, I recall seeing a recovered portion of the Gemini V booster in the museum at the Alabama Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama. I thought it was unusual because I had never before seen a section of a recovered Redstone, Atlas, Titan, or Saturn booster. Whether it is still there I do not know.

Ed beck
Member

Posts: 227
From: Florida
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 12-30-2002 10:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ed beck   Click Here to Email Ed beck     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The old gallery of flight at the Kennedy Space Center had in its entrance hallway a flown flight control vane from Alan Shepard's Freedom 7 flight. That is from inside the rocket engine itself, not an outside control surface. I have found the part on the Redstone on display in the rocket garden. It is red, and right at the end of the engine bell. I do not know if more of the booster was recovered, or how, or when it was salvaged. I think I saw it in the new museum that is there, but I am not sure. I saw that photo of the G-5 booster section as well. I have also seen commemorative pens that were put out by Parker that was stated to contain flown metal from John Glenn's booster from Friendship 7. Not the spacecraft, the booster. I did ask a Parker pen representative once, but they did not know how the booster was found.

I know they were meant to be discarded, but one would think that some of those Saturn V first stages must have survived somehow.

I guess they would be on the bottom of the sea, but didn't the vast ocean cough up Liberty Bell 7. I think it could be coaxed to cough up some part of a Saturn V?

Any known efforts in this direction?

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42981
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 12-30-2002 11:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
According to this page:
Parker made these pens to commemorate the ten-year anniversary of the US space agency we know today as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration or NASA. The pens were made from the Atlas booster rocket which sent Colonel John H. Glenn on his historic flight, man's first, to orbit our planet on February 20, 1962.

While booster rockets normal burn up during their return descent through the atmosphere, a piece survived reentry and landed in Africa. This piece was later returned to NASA who identified it.

Even more interesting (but slightly off-topic) this same page documents that Parker also produced four pens with lunar dust retrieved for the Apollo 15 mission! One set of pens (Glenn and Apollo) sold at auction in 2001 for over $22,500.

Larry McGlynn
Member

Posts: 1255
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Jul 2003

posted 12-31-2002 07:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Larry McGlynn   Click Here to Email Larry McGlynn     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ed, you have raised (sorry for the pun) an interesting point about looking for a S-1C stage of a Saturn V.

I think finding one would depend on a few things though. The first reason is being that the S-1C stage propelled the entire Saturn V rocket up to a height of 42 miles. The plunge from 42 miles would probably destroy the stage upon impact. Water is non-compressible, so an object of the S-1C's construction would probably explode (implode) on impact, since it's construction is from aluminum and the tanks were made to contain ultra cold liquids. It would be the world's largest thermos bottle slamming into the ocean. Quite a bang.

If the first stage maintained any structural intergrity it would sink to the bottom of the ocean. Now where would it come down?

Since we know that it would be approximately 230 miles down range at separation and the S-1C maintained a forward ballistic motion, then it would probably land approximately 400 miles down range (give or take). That would put the stage well beyond the Blake Plateau and into the deep water.

Chances are the stage would disintegrate on contact with the ocean surface and the debris would flutter to the bottom based upon the prevailing wind direction and ocean currents. The debris field would be large and thinly dispersed.

Now if the fuel tanks did not implode upon impact, then the plunge to the bottom would crush the tanks as the external psi built up on the downward journey. At 16,000 feet in depth the psi is about 6000 pounds per square inch. The tanks' collapse would probably flatten the entire stage at that point (unless there was a way for water to get inside the tank and neutralize the external pressure caused by the increased psi at depth). This, again, would probably mean that the stage would disintegrate and, again, leave a debris field.

Now it's time to take into account, Time. It's been 30 years. That is enough time for corrosion to take place as well as some slit build up. So what would be down there by now? A ROV would probably find flattened bits of wreckage covered in silt strewn over a large area of the deep ocean off the Continental Shelf.

Finally, the cost of salvage. The recovery for the Liberty Bell 7 cost the Kansas Cosmosphere about $500,000 and they weren't the only sponsors (the Discovery Channel was a major player too). The recovery of the LB7 as with many wrecks involved statistical analysis of the potential search area, then hiring a magnetic anomaly detector (MAG) or a side scan sonar to do a search pattern over the area (a back and forth pattern called mowing the lawn). A boring process that I have done several times up here looking for new wrecks. Then taking the contacts and trying to recognize the best targets from rock outcrops. Only then do you send down either an ROV (I Think Mike Quinn knows this much better, since he works with them) or divers (in shallower waters). It's a long arduous chore. For the S-1C, the distance from shore and the depth involved would make it a very expensive and sometimes dangerous process.

The search and possible retrieval of an S-1C would probably not be economically viable in light of what might be left.

Though it would be nice to get a piece of an S-1C.

Ed beck
Member

Posts: 227
From: Florida
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 12-31-2002 11:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ed beck   Click Here to Email Ed beck     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Robert Pearlman:
While booster rockets normal burn up during their return descent through the atmosphere, a piece survived reentry and landed in Africa. This piece was later returned to NASA who identified it.
It had been a while since I read about the Parker Pens, I used to work for a catalog company that was a major distributor of Parker pens. We had Parker pen reps come by for pen fairs, and that's absolutely correct, the booster part was found in Africa. I has forgotten that.
quote:
Originally posted by Larry McGlynn:
The search and possible retrieval of an S-1C would probably not be economically viable in light of what might be left.
Thanks for the detailed response on the S-1-C boosters. I pretty much was familiar with the information provided. While the mighty ocean is stingy about giving up its treasures, sometimes things are found in surprisingly good shape. But, with the depth, and remote locations involved the cost would be astronomical. The precious few fragments that might be recovered would likely not justify the cost to find them.

Still, who knows what the future could hold in progress in this area? Maybe someday in our life time?

But, thanks again for a well written explanation.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42981
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 12-31-2002 11:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Curt Newport (who lead the recovery efforts for the Liberty Bell 7) recently posted to sci.space.history on the recovery of the SI-C stages. Here is what he had to say:
I did some figuring on this some time ago due to some interest expressed by the man who funded my Atlantic Target operation (the 1810 sailing ship found during the LB7 search). Max Ary is now in the heart of oil country in Oklahoma and I know he'd like to see at least one of them recovered. I told him to find the money and we can take a crack at it. It's always the money.

I concluded that the S-1C boosters from Apollo 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, and 16 landed in roughly a 5 x 11 nautical mile area. The biggest unknown was how the boosters were tracked. After checking some documentation, I believe they were not really tracked at all; I think they used estimated theoretical impact locations based on flight models. However, if the boosters were fitted with C or S band radar xponders, then the location would be fairly accurate.

Granted, all of the boosters would have been reduced to wreckage with some large intact pieces, depending upon how they impacted the ocean. I would imagine they were tumbling during descent, as that seems to be what happens to these things once all the fuel is spent and they lose guidance. I imagine that many of the F-1 engine bells would have survived and at least some of them should be recognizable and capable of being recovered. Overall, the paint on the boosters should be intact as would be any lettering, as was the case on Liberty Bell 7. In addition, there will be long debris fields for each booster, with the heavier parts nearest the impact point and lighter wreckage farther down current.

These days, using a standard kevlar recovery line, we can lift about 16,000 lbs from those depths, which would be in the range of around 16 to 17,000 feet down in the Atlantic. On a related topic, I do remember that we did find an intact Redstone during the Challenger search (I did not personally see it - that's how it was identified on our target list). Too bad it's still there as it was only in a few hundred feet of water.

music_space
Member

Posts: 1179
From: Canada
Registered: Jul 2001

posted 01-01-2003 05:57 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for music_space   Click Here to Email music_space     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The picture of the Gemini V booster I was refering to at the opening post of this topic shows a rocket stage which seems to be almost intact, as can be appreciated here.

Even taking into consideration the difference in structure and in ballistic trajectories, might we infer that the S-1C would be in better shape than we think?

Larry McGlynn
Member

Posts: 1255
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Jul 2003

posted 01-01-2003 11:28 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Larry McGlynn   Click Here to Email Larry McGlynn     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If Curt Newport and Max Ary can get together again, it would be great to find the Redstone booster. Just think if it was Grissom's.

Finding an F-1 engine bell would be wonderful, but after the LB7 recovery, is it really that sexy to the people who have the money to put together an expedition.

The big thing on any of these salvages is "show me the money."

As for the Gemini V booster, does anyone know what happened to other Titan II first stages? This one is remarkably intact and must have been floating on the surface, since it would have wound up 450 miles down range. So it's landing must have been perfect otherwise it should have sunk in deep ocean. We did not have sufficient technology to find such an item, as we do now, back in 1965.

Unfortunately for us it is still, "Show me the money." You never know though. George Tullock got salvage rights to the Titanic and put together an ocean liner trip (that included Buzz Aldrin) for paying customers to see him salvage a piece of the Titanic. George did pull it off (second time is the charm) and then displayed it during a tour of his exhibit in the US.

Rusty Barton
New Member

Posts: 1
From: Antelope, California, USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 03-19-2003 04:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Rusty Barton   Click Here to Email Rusty Barton     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
There appears to be a section of a Gemini-Titan booster at the Alabama Space and Rocket Center.

Look at the bottom of this page, last picture bottom right (click to enlarge).
From the row of holes at the right hand end, this appears to be the upper portion of a Titan II. From the paint scheme, it appears to be a Gemini-Titan. Could this be the Gemini-Titan 5 recovered first stage?

rocketJoe
Member

Posts: 103
From: Huntsville, AL USA
Registered: Jul 2001

posted 03-20-2003 09:39 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rocketJoe   Click Here to Email rocketJoe     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
A little off the original topic, but the situation at the Space Center in Huntsville is something that has frosted me for some time. As you can see by the pics in the previous post's website link, the Space Center took a one-of-a-kind full scale test version of the skylab space station and junked it out in the elements in a parking lot to make room for.... simplistic hands-on displays, very few having anything to do with space (mostly earth sciences). For over two years this priceless piece of Apollo-era space equipment has been out rusting in the rain. You would think there would be an adequate facility at nearby Marshall Space Flight Center to store this treasure...

(If I had the cash to swing it, I'd build a big garage and house it myself...)

mikej
Member

Posts: 481
From: Germantown, WI USA
Registered: Jan 2004

posted 10-22-2007 06:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for mikej   Click Here to Email mikej     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I was reading AS-501's Flight Evaluation Report and came across this item of interest (p. 4/13-4/14 of the report, which are pages 95-96 in the pdf file):
The theoretical free-flight trajectory data for the discarded S-IC and S-II stages were based on initial conditions obtained from the final postflight trajectory at separation. Some radar prints from an aircraft in the recovery area represented the only data available on the discarded S-IC stage. These radar prints can be correlated with a theoretical free-flight trajectory. They agree best with a free-flight which assumes a 90 degree angle-of-attack. Therefore, this case is used as the S-IC stage trajectory. Visual observation and the radar prints prove that the S-IC stage lost its structural integrity before impact. [emphasis added]
There's a table which contains S-IC stage impact information:

Parameter
Range Time sec
Surface Range km
                 (n mi)
Cross Range km
                 (n mi)
Geodetic Latitude deg
Longitude deg
 Actual
571.0
630.59
(340.49)
6.88
(3.71)
30.163
-74.354
 Nominal
537.5
638.71
(344.88)
11.51
(6.21)
30.147
-74.261
 Act-Nom
33.5
-8.12
(-4.39)
-4.63
(-2.50)
0.022
-0.093

Similarly, AS-502's Flight Evaluation Report (p. 82 in the PDF) notes that "Photographic coverage of the S-IC stage indicated that the stage broke up at 397 seconds." However, the AS-503 Flight Evaluation (p. 95) notes that "no tracking data were available for verification" of the predicted impact area.

So, it seems that the nominal impact predictions for at least the first two S-ICs were "fairly" accurate, but the bad news is the S-ICs' structural integrity had been lost even before impact with the water.

Ken Havekotte
Member

Posts: 2913
From: Merritt Island, Florida, Brevard
Registered: Mar 2001

posted 10-25-2007 07:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ken Havekotte   Click Here to Email Ken Havekotte     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Getting back to MA-6 and GT-5 for a second, Yes, flown rocket-used souvenirs were recorded. I have a flown piece of Glenn's Atlas 109D, that was recovered near Africa, along with a cut fragment of GT-5/Titan II's retrieved first stage booster. As far as I know, these are the only early manned spaceflights where rocket-used segments for them were retrievable and possible to acquire. But yes, indeed, there are numerous discarded, impact damaged, and blown-up missile, rocket, and space satellite "junk" at the bottom of the Atlantic since the Cape firing range started in 1950. As mentioned earlier, perhaps Larry, Curt, and others could someday visit possibly known debris areas. For sure, the discarded S-1Cs--the biggest compenents--of all 13 Saturn V launch vehicles would be a fantastic find. The Saturn booster sections would not be in their original structural condition, but nevertheless, it would be an interesting and historical discovery.

atlas5guy
Member

Posts: 33
From:
Registered: Jun 2007

posted 11-20-2007 11:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for atlas5guy   Click Here to Email atlas5guy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ed beck:
The old gallery of flight at the Kennedy Space Center had in its entrance hallway a flown flight control vane from Alan Shepard's Freedom 7 flight. That is from inside the rocket engine itself, not an outside control surface.
I believe that the jet vane is actually from the Mercury Redstone-1 vehicle that 'flew' the escape tower in the famous aborted launch in late 1960. The label on the display is probably a misunderstanding of Shepard's flight being 'the first manned Mercury Redstone' flight (and the booster was 'scrapped' after the incident). There is no record of Shepard's Redstone having been located (either in whole or in part) after the flight; I thought I should take this opportunity to correct an apparent error in the display label. Any comments?

Ken Havekotte
Member

Posts: 2913
From: Merritt Island, Florida, Brevard
Registered: Mar 2001

posted 11-21-2007 05:18 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ken Havekotte   Click Here to Email Ken Havekotte     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Agreed! Like you, I am aware and have seen the control vane that came from a MR-launch vehicle. I have always questioned their description of the rocket-used artifact, and at one time, requested to see any related documentation to support their original claim. After so many years went by, and if I am not mistaken, nothing was ever known nor received about it. Let me check on it again during my next business trip or two, hopefully next week, as I was always under the impression that MA-6 and GT-5 were only known and proven piloted M-G-A spaceflights where actual flown-used booster sections were retrieved.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement