*HTML is ON *UBB Code is ON Smilies Legend
Smilies Legend
If you have previously registered, but forgotten your password, click here.
T O P I C R E V I E WspaceukYesterday's UK Independent newspaper carried a good two page colour spread that basically supported Hubble and urging for it to be serviced and kept in space.It even carried the 'correct' image of the far distant galaxy that Hubble had imaged and which is believed to have formed just 750 million years after the birth of the universe.A lot of news agencies have been using 'any' Hubble deep space image to portray this far distant one instead of the correct one. The ones in Google's sci/tech news area were especially misleading earlier on in week to casual viewers.ejectrWell....with a presidential election this year in the U.S., people who are currently at the top making the decisions won't necessarily be there when the shuttle repair mission rolls around.Not to say that the current administrator hasn't done a good job, because I for one believe he has. But he won't necessarily still be there in January 2005. NASA Administrator is a presidential appointment as well as President of NASA being the sitting Vice President of the United States.There's hope for Hubble in more ways than one!pokeyHubble will not be serviced again by NASA. The orbit is not forgiving on the return if there are numerous jet failures, abort sites in Africa have to be kept open just for Hubble (ISS flights abort to US or Europe), etc. It's all laid out in this streaming video from a Canadian interview with American space expert James Oberg.Here's a copy of what I put out under another topic thread last week:***********Feb 9, 'Daily Planet' (Canada), Jim comments on "Save Hubble" Campaign(streaming video) http://www.exn.ca/news/video/exn2004/02/09/exn20040209-hubble.asx ejectrAll this may be true pokey......but the politician is more powerful than the pen sometimes.We never thought we'd see John Glenn fly again, either.Never say never...........[This message has been edited by ejectr (edited February 18, 2004).]pokeyshock...denial...anger...acceptance :-(
It even carried the 'correct' image of the far distant galaxy that Hubble had imaged and which is believed to have formed just 750 million years after the birth of the universe.
A lot of news agencies have been using 'any' Hubble deep space image to portray this far distant one instead of the correct one. The ones in Google's sci/tech news area were especially misleading earlier on in week to casual viewers.
Not to say that the current administrator hasn't done a good job, because I for one believe he has. But he won't necessarily still be there in January 2005. NASA Administrator is a presidential appointment as well as President of NASA being the sitting Vice President of the United States.
There's hope for Hubble in more ways than one!
Here's a copy of what I put out under another topic thread last week:***********Feb 9, 'Daily Planet' (Canada), Jim comments on "Save Hubble" Campaign(streaming video) http://www.exn.ca/news/video/exn2004/02/09/exn20040209-hubble.asx
We never thought we'd see John Glenn fly again, either.
Never say never...........
[This message has been edited by ejectr (edited February 18, 2004).]
Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts
Copyright 1999-2024 collectSPACE. All rights reserved.