Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Stamps & Covers
  Space Cover 819: Pre-astronaut Joe Kittinger

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Space Cover 819: Pre-astronaut Joe Kittinger
yeknom-ecaps
Member

Posts: 950
From: Northville MI USA
Registered: Aug 2005

posted 08-19-2025 03:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for yeknom-ecaps   Click Here to Email yeknom-ecaps     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Space Cover of the Week, Week 819 (August 17, 2025)

Space Cover 819: Pre-Astronaut Joe Kittinger

In the late 1950s Captain Joe Kittinger was assigned to the Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories at Wright-Patterson AFB in Dayton, Ohio. For Project Excelsior (meaning "ever upward"), a name given to the project by Colonel John Paul Stapp (himself well known for his riding aboard Rocket Sled tests) as part of research into high-altitude bailouts, he made a series of three extreme altitude parachute jumps from an open gondola carried aloft by large helium balloons.

These jumps were made in a "rocking-chair" position, descending on his back, rather than in the usual face-down position familiar to skydivers. This was because he was wearing a 60 pound "kit" on his behind, and his pressure suit naturally formed a sitting shape when it was inflated, a shape appropriate for sitting in an airplane cockpit.

Kittinger's first high-altitude jump on Excelsior I was from about 76,400 feet on November 16, 1959. This jump was a near disaster when an equipment malfunction caused him to lose consciousness. The automatic parachute opener in his equipment saved his life. He went into a flat spin at a rotational velocity of about 120 rotations-per-minute, the g-forces at his extremities having been calculated to be over 22 times the force of gravity, setting another record.

On December 11, 1959 on Excelsior II, Kittinger jumped again from about 74,700 feet.

On August 16, 1960 on Excelsior III, Kittinger made the final high-altitude jump at 102,800 feet during. Towing a small drogue parachute for initial stabilization, he fell for 4 minutes and 36 seconds, reaching a maximum speed of 614 miles per hour before opening his parachute at 18,000 feet. During this mission Kittinger incurred yet another equipment malfunction, the pressurization for his right glove malfunctioned during the ascent and his right hand swelled to twice its normal size, but he rode the balloon up to 102,800 feet before stepping off.

Of the jumps from Excelsior, Kittinger said:

There's no way you can visualize the speed. There's nothing you can see to see how fast you're going. You have no depth perception. If you're in a car driving down the road and you close your eyes, you have no idea what your speed is. It's the same thing if you're free falling from space. There are no signposts. You know you are going very fast, but you don't feel it. You don't have a 614-mph wind blowing on you. I could only hear myself breathing in the helmet.

Kittinger set historical numbers for highest balloon ascent, highest parachute jump, longest-duration drogue-fall (four minutes), and fastest speed by a human being through the atmosphere. These were the USAF records but were not submitted for aerospace world records to the Fédération Aéronautique Internationale (FAI).

Kittinger's record for the highest ascent was broken in 1961 by Malcolm Ross and Victor Prather. His records for highest parachute jump and fastest velocity stood for 52 years, until they were broken in 2012 by Felix Baumgartner.

Joe Kittinger was always gracious to collectors who asked for his autograph as well as for carrying covers on many of his balloon flights and jumps. Shown above is a cover for the Excelsior III record setting flight. The cover has the “normal” hand-written document cachet for a flown cover:

  • CARRIED BY: /s/ J W Kittinger
    CAPT. J.W. KITTINGER, JR. U.S.A.F.
  • DATE: 16 Aug 60
  • ALTITUDE: 103,000 ft
  • FREE FALL: 86,000 ft
  • Plus, a pen drawn PROJECT “EXCELSIOR” balloon with Kittinger jumping out
  • Postmarked August 18, 1960, from Alamogordo, New Mexico
Another one...

Covers for this event are notably from many of the flown X-plane cover collectors. A similar cover above is addressed to flown X-plane collector Raymond L. Davis. This cover sold in the Spring 2025 Heritage auction for $425 (including buyer premium).

Interestingly, I have not seen a cover for the actual flight date but multiple of the flown covers postmarked on August 18th. Any one have or seen a jump day cover?

Also of interest, Kittinger was involved in the Stargazer project at Holloman Air Force Base on December 13–14, 1962. He and astronomer William C. White took a balloon packed with scientific equipment up to an altitude of about 82,200 feet, where they spent over 18 hours and performed a number of astronomical observations. Space collectors may have a cover for this flight as Space Craft Covers produced one for it with a Holloman AFB postmark of December 13, 1962.

For an in-depth look at these and other stratospheric flights read "The Pre-Astronauts: Manned Ballooning on the Threshold of Space" by Craig Ryan.

micropooz
Member

Posts: 1866
From: Washington, DC, USA
Registered: Apr 2003

posted 08-19-2025 06:18 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for micropooz   Click Here to Email micropooz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Outstanding carried covers Tom!

A few more factoids on Joe Kittinger…

As Tom mentioned, he worked with Dr. Paul Stapp on aerospace medicine research projects. He started out flying "chase" to Stapp's rocket sled test. When you see photos of Stapp's rocket sled runs, you will often see a T-33 jet trainer above and slightly behind – Kittinger.

Another project that Kittinger and Stapp worked on was perfecting the airplane "zero-g" parabola maneuver that has since been used for astronaut training and brief moments of zero-g research. Back then Kittinger and Stapp called the maneuver "sub-gravity" and here is a cover that Kittinger flew on one of those flights:

When the Viet Nam War rolled around, Kittinger, by then an accomplished researcher and project manager with Stapp, could have continued his research flying. But he felt compelled to do the job for which he was trained - be a fighter pilot. He went to Viet Nam, shot down a communist MiG fighter plane, and he himself was shot down. He spent 11 months as a prisoner of war (POW) in the infamous "Hanoi Hilton" POW jail. When the North Vietnamese got word that they had a hero in captivity, Kittinger was subjected to even more torture than usual for Hanoi Hilton inmates.

In 2012, Kittinger served as an advisor and the "capcom" for Felix Baumgartner's parachute jump that broke Kittinger's altitude record.

A hero in every light...

onesmallstep
Member

Posts: 1531
From: Staten Island, New York USA
Registered: Nov 2007

posted 08-20-2025 09:40 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for onesmallstep   Click Here to Email onesmallstep     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It should be also pointed out that Col. Kittinger made a stratospheric balloon ascent on 2 June 1957 to 96,784 ft. as part of Project Manhigh, a 1955-58 USAF program to study the effects of cosmic rays on humans. The selection criteria for Kittinger and the two other men who made flights during Manhigh were subsequently used for astronauts in Project Mercury.

Two books on the subject are recommended:

  • "The Pre-Astronauts: Manned Ballooning on the Threshold of Space" by Craig Ryan
  • "Touching Space: The Story of Project Manhigh" by Gregory Kennedy

randyc
Member

Posts: 952
From: Highlands Ranch, CO USA
Registered: May 2003

posted 08-20-2025 11:06 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for randyc   Click Here to Email randyc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I don’t want to sound negative regarding the flown status of two of the three covers shown above but I have a question that I think is important for Astrophilatelists and Aerophilatelists concerning covers that are said to be flown. How can a collector be sure that a cover has been flown/carried/aboard an aircraft, helicopter, spacecraft, balloon, etc. if it doesn’t specifically state that it was flown?

For example, the first cover shown above states that it has been flown and ‘certified’ by Kittinger with his signature and information about the mission, while the other two covers do not mention that they were flown, either in writing, a rubber stamp, or some other method. I believe that just because a cover has writing from the pilot/astronaut/balloonist etc, regarding the mission it isn’t a guarantee that it was flown unless specifically stated.

I’ve seen covers that weren’t flown with hand-written information about the mission and signed by the pilot, so that alone doesn’t guarantee the flown status. Sometimes the cover will have typed information prepared by the collector that starts with ‘Flown aboard/via’ or ‘Carried on’ with a space to provide the pilot, or someone else on the flight, to add information regarding the type of aircraft that the cover was flown on such as HH-3E, Jolly 80/81/87, Helicopter, C-130, etc.

When I prepared covers to be flown the first line that I typed on the cover was ‘Flown on’ so that if it had information that was added, and signed by the pilot, co-pilot, and crew I was more confident that it was flown.

Sometimes there will be a letter sent with the cover stating that it was flown, but unless a direct link between the letter and cover is established it would be difficult to use the letter as authentication. And if the letter is lost or separated from the cover there is no authentication.

I’m interested in the thoughts of other flown cover collectors regarding what is required to confidently know the flown status of a cover.

Ken Havekotte
Member

Posts: 3997
From: Merritt Island, Florida, Brevard
Registered: Mar 2001

posted 08-20-2025 01:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ken Havekotte   Click Here to Email Ken Havekotte     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Just briefly Randy as I have also posted some of my opinions about this very same topic, but when I did so on cS, I can't recall. But here is one such example:

I did speak with a couple of helicopter crewmen while on a visit to Patrick AFB (now Patrick Space Force Base) during the late 1980's. While they did confirm that many of the mailed-in covers to their offices of Det. 15 of the 39th Aerospace Rescue & Recovery Squadron stationed at Patrick were put aboard, but not all were indeed flown on the Air Force Jolly Green Giants (CH-3E) as their cachet write-ups may had indicated.

On some prepared carried/flown covers like this in supporting rocket flights down the Cape range, the word "Carried" or "Flown" would be scratched out by a pen or marker. But with so many requests coming in (even overwhelming at times), especially for milestone missions, not every cover could be accommodated in this way. Some covers never found their way onboard, however, the pilots and other flight crewmembers in many cases did indeed fill-them out and signed at the bottom. Bottom line, though, was that some had not been flown despite their title "flown" at top left which had not been marked out.

Those historic flight research covers that we see from time to time, mostly from the 1950/60s, I am hoping were indeed carried by their designated pilots as described.

Others that I have seen and own, as an additional stipulation, have indicated in their own hand on the covers themselves as being carried or flown. Sometimes an insert card would help with more information by the cover carrier, and perhaps better yet, with a provided documentation letter by the pilot or other carrier.

Some of my favorite covers in this category are those that indicated where they had been stored or placed at during the carried event, how many, and with other provided details and if possible even photos if that would help.

yeknom-ecaps
Member

Posts: 950
From: Northville MI USA
Registered: Aug 2005

posted 08-20-2025 01:23 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for yeknom-ecaps   Click Here to Email yeknom-ecaps     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks Randy and Ken for your comments... you are both correct - and the same can be said for autographs on items, I have several signed "in-person" that no authentication service would say it is real but I know they are.

You also have to remember that for these pilots, rocket personnel, etc. it was NOT their job to carry these, nor did they know and/or care about the provenance associated with the items. They were doing a "favor" for a collector who asked.

Having said that, Barbara Baker did have the foresight to ask the person carrying the cover ( or person processing the carried cover) to write a statement on the stuffer card.

That said, I have some stuffer cards stating they were flown but do not have the actual cover as they somewhere along the way got separated.

Can you even be 100% sure it was carried even with a signed statement ... unless you were actually there to see it, the answer is no.

Ken Havekotte
Member

Posts: 3997
From: Merritt Island, Florida, Brevard
Registered: Mar 2001

posted 08-20-2025 01:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ken Havekotte   Click Here to Email Ken Havekotte     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Very well said Tom, but like in all areas, rather signed, flown, etc. as you pointed out, unless you see it, it may always be in question. In the case of the flown Apollo 15 lunar covers, the crew arranged and signed an official affidavit, which I guess is the best they could do for the documentation of their covers flown to the moon?

That's why on a few carried cover and private signing occasions that I had been involved with, I tried my best to go every step further in trying to get the best documentation possible. Even photos of the event showing such covers, signed items, etc., I have included or provided.

randyc
Member

Posts: 952
From: Highlands Ranch, CO USA
Registered: May 2003

posted 08-20-2025 03:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for randyc   Click Here to Email randyc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
While it's correct to say that a collector cannot be absolutely, positively, 100% certain that a cover was flown or genuinely signed without personally witnessing the event the difference between authenticating a signature and authenticating the flown status of a cover is that with a signature there is something to look at and evaluate (the signature), but unless a 'flown' cover has information on it stating that it was flown, or documentation that states that it was flown, there is nothing to look at or evaluate. And even though signature authentication is not 100% accurate at least it gives the collector some information regarding the authenticity of the signature. They may not agree with the evaluation, but at least there's something to evaluate.

The best a collector can do is make a decision based on the available information. In the case of whether a cover was flown or not the only information is what is on the cover or provided with the cover (documentation). It may still be incorrect, but at least a collector has some information and unless there is proof that the information is incorrect has to assume (hope?) that it is correct.

yeknom-ecaps
Member

Posts: 950
From: Northville MI USA
Registered: Aug 2005

posted 08-20-2025 03:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for yeknom-ecaps   Click Here to Email yeknom-ecaps     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Correct Randy - but what about the scenario in the original post — my cover has "carried by" and Kittinger signed right next to those words so I am assuming he has read and agreed to them. The Heritage (and other covers I've seen for the jump) do not say "flown" or "carried" however they contain the same data filled in by Kittinger and the same late date postmark (18th versus 16th) from the same place Holloman AFB, so could one conclude since it has the same characteristics as the one with the word "carried" that these were carried too?

I would agree if there were no covers signed that stated "carried" there is a question of it being carried, in this case I would say it is likely that the Heritage cover was flown.

Same with Dennis' F-94C cover. It doesn't say "carried" anywhere but has characteristics of being carried, pilot fills in flight details, postmark from flight location but a later date, no proof it was flown but could certainly be...

At the end of the day, if not seen, it is a best guess.

Ken Havekotte
Member

Posts: 3997
From: Merritt Island, Florida, Brevard
Registered: Mar 2001

posted 08-20-2025 04:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ken Havekotte   Click Here to Email Ken Havekotte     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It could certainly be flown, Tom, but if there is no carried or flown notation regardless of other similar notated covers by that same pilot, etc., I would assume that it may not be flown. That above "Special Flight" cachet cover in my opinion is too weak for me in thinking that its more likely flown. A pilot could still write-in the requested information and sign it without any reference to a carried/flown status. I do know of some covers this would apply to, however, it would certainly help a lot if a pilot did note otherwise.

yeknom-ecaps
Member

Posts: 950
From: Northville MI USA
Registered: Aug 2005

posted 08-20-2025 04:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for yeknom-ecaps   Click Here to Email yeknom-ecaps     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Eddie, if you still have all the Harry Gordon covers your Dad had gotten, do all the flown covers have "carried" or "flown" in the cachet? I assume they do.

Pooz has commented several times on the X-2 covers signed by Iven Kincholoe that (likely) weren't flown even though the cachet says "flown" and "flight numbers" added along with his signature.

onesmallstep
Member

Posts: 1531
From: Staten Island, New York USA
Registered: Nov 2007

posted 08-21-2025 08:13 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for onesmallstep   Click Here to Email onesmallstep     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I have only a few Shuttle-era flown helicopter rescue covers, plus a lot more 50s-70s era flown 'rocket mail' covers, so I can't speak with a high degree of authority on flown vs. unflown covers. But on the other end of the scale, you have the flown Apollo covers, and the well-known debate about the phrase 'flown to the moon' and if that meant the covers in question stayed in orbit, or were taken down to the surface.

There is of course the infamous Apollo 15 'Sieger covers' that were clearly stowed in Dave Scott's A7L suit pockets and then were inscribed as being on the lunar surface. In those cases, the exact wording of 'flown to...' makes a big difference, especially as to value.

Ken Havekotte
Member

Posts: 3997
From: Merritt Island, Florida, Brevard
Registered: Mar 2001

posted 08-21-2025 09:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ken Havekotte   Click Here to Email Ken Havekotte     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
First, it was good seeing you Eddie at our space show last Saturday at the Cape. I did check over that box you had of many carried/flown aircraft and balloon flight covers. It was fascinating, but I guess you're keeping all the rocket plane covers that were not in the box, and rightly so!

Regarding Apollo 15 Moon covers as mentioned in the prior post -- The original or first batch of Sieger covers were those 100 that Scott mailed to Horst Eiermann for Hermann Sieger in Stuttgart, Germany. Those first moon covers had the hand written notation at top left as being onboard the Falcon at the Hadley-Apennine, Moon, July 30-August 2, 1971.

Having talked with Scott and Worden together on the issue of another or second batch of those Sieger covers, once the crew were heading for the moon, Scott had said that he transferred the covers from his suit leg pocket over to the LM-Falcon and were stored inside Falcon for lunar surface landing.

At top left of the crew's personal 300 Sieger covers (or 298 of them), it reads: "This envelope was carried to the moon aboard Apollo 15 #_____ of 300 to the lunar surface in L.M. "Falcon," which is another story within itself.

The crew signed certifications for the 300 did originally indicate "orbit of the moon,"
however, that had been changed, I believe by Scott himself, by crossing over that phrase and writing-in by hand "landing on" the moon.

The insert card for each of the 300 series stated that that moon covers were "stowed aboard the spacecraft in a sealed fireproof packet and carried to the lunar surface in LM "FALCON..."

I do believe those covers did indeed land on the moon, however, we really only have Scott's word on it as Irwin and Worden knew very little about them (hardly nothing at all) before their flight.

Axman
Member

Posts: 800
From: Derbyshire UK
Registered: Mar 2023

posted 08-21-2025 09:57 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Axman   Click Here to Email Axman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I have a different, and rather convoluted take on this subject.

I do not believe these covers, or indeed the missions behind them, are astronautical. They, in my opinion, are purely aeronautical. They have nothing to do with space and everything to do with atmosphere.

In my opinion Joe Kittinger was not a pre-astronaut, but an advanced aeronaut.

I understand boundaries can be challenging to define, but please. Leaping out of a balloon is no more pre-astronautical, than the sheep chicken and duck sent upwards by the Montgolfiers.

onesmallstep
Member

Posts: 1531
From: Staten Island, New York USA
Registered: Nov 2007

posted 08-21-2025 10:34 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for onesmallstep   Click Here to Email onesmallstep     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
You can call Col. Kittinger a 'pre-astronaut' or 'advanced aeronaut' but make no mistake: Both designations speak of almost touching the void of space and undertaking important experiments in relation to studying the effects of cosmic rays on humans; medical research; equipment for high-altitude flights; and astronomical observations. 'Pre-astronaut' does not connote being a prospective astronaut candidate/trainee; it just means one preceded the era of crewed vehicle/spacecraft that crossed either the 50-mile mark (for example: the X-15 pilots); or the Karman Line (62 miles).

Keep in mind; the last flight of the US Navy's Strato Lab program, on 4 May 1961, took Cdr Malcolm Ross and LtCdr Vic Prather, M.D. to a record 113,740 ft. above the (then) Gulf of Mexico. One of the tasks was a final test of the BF Goodrich Mk IV pressure suit, to be used by Mercury astronauts. The next day, fellow Navy officer Cdr Alan Shepard broke their record aboard MR-3/Freedom 7. So, in a sense, Ross and Prather (he tragically drowned during recovery operations) were indeed 'pre-astronauts.'

Axman
Member

Posts: 800
From: Derbyshire UK
Registered: Mar 2023

posted 08-21-2025 12:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Axman   Click Here to Email Axman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
With all due respect you have missed my point. I understand where the Karman line lies, I grasp the concept of outer space.

Using words such as "cosmic-rays" and "astronomical" does not automatically attach astronautical connotations to the subject. Neither Victor Hess, nor Tycho Brahe can seriously be thought of in astronautical terms.

It's as non-sensical as describing Hannibal as pre-Spanish, or Henry Tudor as pre-Elizabethan. In reality it is gibberish.

onesmallstep
Member

Posts: 1531
From: Staten Island, New York USA
Registered: Nov 2007

posted 08-21-2025 01:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for onesmallstep   Click Here to Email onesmallstep     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
There is a book called the "The Pre-Astronauts" as I mentioned above, by a respected author on upper stratospheric balloon flights. You can designate a person(s) however you wish, as exemplified by the recent rash of neophyte 'astronauts,' 'space tourists,' 'star voyagers' etc. that have flown on Virgin Galactic and Blue Origin vehicles (there is of course a heated debate on awarding a title of 'astronaut' to those non-professionals that launch into space, but that's another topic for another forum on cS).

You can call Kittinger an experienced engineer; test pilot; combat pilot; and yes 'aeronaut'- and also a pre-astronaut, if you wish to separate him from the era of crewed space flight aboard a spacecraft. A lot of others have used 'pre-' in their book titles/magazine articles/posts etc. For example: the Pre-Columbian era in the Western Hemisphere before the arrival of Christopher Columbus in 1492. It's just a handy designator, just like 'pre-Sputnik' before the start of the space race.

yeknom-ecaps
Member

Posts: 950
From: Northville MI USA
Registered: Aug 2005

posted 08-21-2025 10:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for yeknom-ecaps   Click Here to Email yeknom-ecaps     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
From Art Thompson, Chairman Flight Test Historical Foundation:
During his years in the Air Force, he [Joe Kittinger] worked closely with Dr. John Paul Stapp on safety systems for aircraft and space systems. As part of Dr. Stapp's team he worked with companies including the David Clark Company to help develop early space suits, life support, egress and safety systems.

Tasked with the question, "Can man survive in space?", Joe was instrumental in the Man-High and Excelsior programs where he and Dr Stapp's team studied effects of flat spin and partial pressure suits in near space. On his 34th parachute jump, Joe Kittinger set a record for an assisted free-fall from near space wearing the recently developed pressure suit, stepping from a Stratospheric balloon platform and free falling with a drogue parachute from 102,800 feet (31.3 kilometers). Joe reached a speed of 614 mph being the first person to see the extreme curvature of Earth from such an altitude. His record held for 52 years.

Dr. Stapp and Col. Joseph Kittinger's work on Stargazer and Excelsior laid the groundwork for the Gemini and Apollo space programs, high altitude flight, egress and space safety.

Eddie Bizub
Member

Posts: 175
From: Kissimmee, FL USA
Registered: Aug 2010

posted 08-21-2025 10:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Eddie Bizub   Click Here to Email Eddie Bizub     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by yeknom-ecaps:
Eddie, if you still have all the Harry Gordon covers your Dad had gotten, do all the flown covers have "carried" or "flown" in the cachet?
Tom, I looked at the Harry Gordon covers that dad was able to acquire. Maybe half say either "Flown" or "Carried" as part of the cachet. The rest have no notation specifically indicating that they were flown. A random F-86 cover simply has a rubber stamp cachet of an F-86 and the box where the flight information would be filled in by the pilot. This would include aircraft, flight #, date, flight location and pilot signature. It is always assumed that covers from Harry Gordon and a few other collectors of the time were indeed flown. In the end, it always comes down to good faith that these covers were in fact flown. When dad sent out for flown covers throughout the Apollo program he typed a cachet on the cover for the pilot to fill in the information. Always at the top was "Flown On Board". Again, I have to believe on good faith that they were in fact flown.

Ken, yes its always good to see you and talk with you about space covers! The only rocket plane covers I found in dad's collections...at least so far...are an X-2 flown by Everest and a D-558-II Skyrocket flown by Bridgeman. I know there were more and I still may come across them. I still have thousands of covers to go through,. He also may have sold them himself before he passed away.

On a side note, the X-2 cover does say flown as part of the cachet. The Skyrocket cover does not indicate that it was flown. Bridgeman however did fill in the flight information and signed the cover.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 1999-2025 collectSPACE. All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement