*HTML is ON *UBB Code is ON Smilies Legend
Smilies Legend
If you have previously registered, but forgotten your password, click here.
T O P I C R E V I E WLM-12Gemini 7 onboard footage from the National Archives. Lots of 16mm film footage of the tumbling second stage booster.BlackarrowNice find! This made me wonder whether any Gemini crew ever took a still photo of their Gemini booster-rocket in orbit. No such photo appears in "Spaceshots and Snapshots of Mercury and Gemini" by Bisney & Pickering, so I assume not.LM-12From the Gemini 7 Mission Report:After completing the turnaround maneuver, the spacecraft was north of the second stage and about 100 feet from it. The second stage was tumbling and venting profusely from what appeared to be a vent valve at the base of the fuel tank ...No difficulty was encountered in maintaining position with the second stage of the vehicle. The distance from the spacecraft to the vehicle varied from approximately 60 to 150 feet. The venting fuel from the second stage caused it to translate as well as tumble, and more spacecraft fuel was expended than originally planned to maintain position. An added problem to station keeping was the setting sun which near the end of the daylight phase made viewing the second stage very difficult.BlackarrowI assume the implication is that it would have been difficult (certainly on Gemini 7) to catch a decent view of the booster for still photography. Certainly, movie footage shows clearly what might be quite indistinct in a single image.That reminds me that I have seen at least one image of an Atlas booster after its Mercury capsule had separated, but I think it was taken by an automatic camera on one of the early unmanned tests.SkyMan1958It was taken on Mercury-Atlas 5.LM-12MA-5 frame 020 in the March To The Moon gallery is one view of the booster.Frame 027 managed to catch the booster and the moon in the same shot.
After completing the turnaround maneuver, the spacecraft was north of the second stage and about 100 feet from it. The second stage was tumbling and venting profusely from what appeared to be a vent valve at the base of the fuel tank ...No difficulty was encountered in maintaining position with the second stage of the vehicle. The distance from the spacecraft to the vehicle varied from approximately 60 to 150 feet. The venting fuel from the second stage caused it to translate as well as tumble, and more spacecraft fuel was expended than originally planned to maintain position. An added problem to station keeping was the setting sun which near the end of the daylight phase made viewing the second stage very difficult.
No difficulty was encountered in maintaining position with the second stage of the vehicle. The distance from the spacecraft to the vehicle varied from approximately 60 to 150 feet. The venting fuel from the second stage caused it to translate as well as tumble, and more spacecraft fuel was expended than originally planned to maintain position. An added problem to station keeping was the setting sun which near the end of the daylight phase made viewing the second stage very difficult.
That reminds me that I have seen at least one image of an Atlas booster after its Mercury capsule had separated, but I think it was taken by an automatic camera on one of the early unmanned tests.
Frame 027 managed to catch the booster and the moon in the same shot.
Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts
Copyright 1999-2024 collectSPACE. All rights reserved.