Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

Forum:Free Space
Topic:Timeless (NBC TV series) and space history
Want to register?
Who Can Post? Any registered users may post a reply.
About Registration You must be registered in order to post a topic or reply in this forum.
Your UserName:
Your Password:   Forget your password?
Your Reply:


*HTML is ON
*UBB Code is ON

Smilies Legend

Options Disable Smilies in This Post.
Show Signature: include your profile signature. Only registered users may have signatures.
*If HTML and/or UBB Code are enabled, this means you can use HTML and/or UBB Code in your message.

If you have previously registered, but forgotten your password, click here.

randyIt was a good show last night. It provided a good lead into the new movie about the programmers who worked behind the scenes and introduced Katherine Johnson, one of the programmers. I thought it was very well done.
Robert PearlmanI was impressed by the production values when it came to the set of Mission Control. Other television shows with longer needs (multiple episodes) have used far less impressive recreations.

It wasn't exact (there is no second level viewing platform at the far end of the room and the 16mm footage wasn't live on the front screens, for example) but it was excellent for the constraints of the medium.

I was also happy to see they consulted the mission transcript, citing the 1202 alarm and low fuel warnings; that they knew Charlie Duke was capcom and made reference to Gene Kranz's good luck vests (though the latter is more widely known thanks to "Apollo 13").

I don't think the desktop computer-style workstations were even in existence in 1969, but I can understand why they would use them. I am not quite sure why a comm drop out would spell certain doom for the crew, assuming they could still communicate with Mike Collins in orbit (who went completely unmentioned in the episode), but it gave them a plot device.

It was a surprise to see Katherine Johnson. She wasn't at the Manned Spacecraft Center for Apollo 11, but she did support the mission from Langley, so her inclusion wasn't completely out of place. By then, she was more than familiar with the operation of the computers, so her role in the show was not outside her character (and the alternate history outcome they gave her was quite a nice tribute).

Lockman Aerospace was also a nice touch, sort of a cross between Lockheed and Grumman, and a good way to show that it was more than NASA that had a hand in the missions.

Overall, a good episode! Now, with von Braun and Apollo behind us, will spaceflight history show up again on Timeless?

mikepfThe big storytelling advantage of having the timelines altered in the first episode is that they can take liberties with actual history from there on.
cfreeze79Part of my problem with the show is the "butterfly effect" isn't being taken as seriously as it should...

But Kudos for the space exploration mentions - I guess NASA really DID go to the moon!

LiemboSome pretty glaring anachronisms:
  • Color TV test pattern bars at mission control when they lost comms
  • Modern white ABS plastic keyboard in the data center
  • Magnetic/swipe badges
  • The computer screen captures were goofy and uses terminology and nomenclature from 80's
  • Mercury astronaut shown on screen when communicating with Apollo 11
The paper tape bits were very strange, I don't think a 12 inch strip torn from the machine is going to do much on its own. The computer screen captures were goofy and uses terminology and nomenclature from 80's.

But, the show, like Scorpion, is one where you have to just enjoy it and turnoff your fact checking part of your brain for 40 minutes. Still enjoyable and great sets and costume work.

cfreeze79Ever since the first episode, they have been working in an "alternate" timeline from our own, ergo the anachronisms may be from the resulting changes ("butterfly effect").

Just a thought, but they could explain it. Like in the scene from "Thank You for Smoking":

Jeff Megall: Sony has a futuristic sci-fi movie they're looking to make.

Nick Naylor: Cigarettes in space?

Jeff: It's the final frontier, Nick.

Nick: But wouldn't they blow up in an all oxygen environment?

Jeff: Probably. But it's an easy fix. One line of dialogue. 'Thank God we invented the... you know, whatever device.'

Robert Pearlman
quote:
Originally posted by Liembo:
Color TV test pattern bars at mission control when they lost comms
I had questioned this one as well, but the SMPTE color bars were originally conceived in 1951 and the test pattern was patented in 1956. And so while it may have not have been used in Mission Control, it did exist at the time to be used.

Likewise, magnetic stripe cards were developed by IBM in 1960 under a contract for a government security system.

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 1999-2024 collectSPACE. All rights reserved.





advertisement