Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Mercury - Gemini - Apollo
  Apollo files in Department of War UAP release

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Apollo files in Department of War UAP release
Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 56501
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 05-08-2026 12:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
On Friday (May 8), U.S. Department of War (DOW) released documents regarding Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP).
The materials archived here are unresolved cases, meaning the government is unable to make a definitive determination on the nature of the observed phenomena. This can occur for a variety of reasons, including a lack of sufficient data, and the Department of War welcomes the application of private-sector analysis, information and expertise. DOW will continue to conduct separate reporting on resolved UAP cases, as mandated by statute.
Among the documents are a number of Apollo photos and technical briefing reports, all of which were earlier released by NASA (without the UAP commentary). This is not the forum to discuss UAPs in general, but here are the Apollo-related files on the DOW website:

MOL
Member

Posts: 226
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Oct 2004

posted 05-08-2026 12:40 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for MOL   Click Here to Email MOL     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Regarding NASA-UAP-VM6, Apollo 17, 1972 —

If this had been a screenshot from downlinked video then it would have been very easily explained. The LRV color TV camera used a color wheel which spun internally consisting of red, blue and green filters. In certain cases this could be seen through lens as an artifact. It was most pronounced during fast motion.

Rather, it is Hasselblad photo. The image was taken from inside the lunar module looking through the window before EVA 1. It could definitely be a reflection of a light source from inside the cabin.

Dietrich
Member

Posts: 93
From:
Registered: Jul 2009

posted 05-09-2026 06:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dietrich   Click Here to Email Dietrich     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The Apollo 12 photos are:
  • NASA-UAP-VM1, Apollo 12, 1969 AS12-46-6842
  • NASA-UAP-VM2, Apollo 12, 1969 AS12-46-6846
  • NASA-UAP-VM3, Apollo 12, 1969 AS12-46-6847
  • NASA-UAP-VM4, Apollo 12, 1969 AS12-46-6848
  • NASA-UAP-VM5, Apollo 12, 1969 AS12-46-6849

MOL
Member

Posts: 226
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Oct 2004

posted 05-09-2026 12:46 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for MOL   Click Here to Email MOL     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
For what its worth, the Apollo 12 landing site had the lowest elevation Sun angle of any of the six landing sites. Even the fine optics of a Hasselblad camera could not completely block the intensity of that light as it reflected off the surrounding terrain and into the lens.

I propose that this is by far the most likely explanation, given these aberrations appear mostly in the Apollo 12 photos.

oly
Member

Posts: 1542
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: Apr 2015

posted 05-10-2026 03:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for oly   Click Here to Email oly     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I am sure there is a basic, logical explanation for this. Anyone who has ever tried to photograph a glass object, such as a wine bottle, while trying to control the light and shadow, avoid getting the reflection of the camera and artificial lights, etc, knows just how hard it can be to control stray light.

The lunar module windows were not a single pane of glass; they were made of Chemcor 0312 chemically tempered glass for the structural inner pane and Vycor 7913 for the outer pane to protect against debris. Each window featured an anti-reflective coating to prevent glare from the intense, unfiltered sunlight.

Theoretically, just these three layers could create a three colour refracted artifact that appeared to be three individual elements.

As light passes through each layer, it is refracted. Bounced light and lights coming from the inside can reflect off one or more of the individual coatings, some at different wavelengths, creating different colours.

Light reflecting off the camera lens back onto the LM window could theoretically cause such an artifact as well, as could many other things.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright collectSPACE. All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement